법조윤리협의회의 운영절차에 관한 연구
A Study on the Legal Ethics and Professional Conduct Council Operating Procedures
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Legal Ethics and Professional Conduct Council was established on July 27th, 2007 to foster legal ethics and a sound legal climate. The goals of this national organization are to establish regular monitoring and analysis of legal ethics as well as establishing measures designed to curtail the practice of granting special legal privileges to former government legal officials. Though four years have passed since the establishment of the Legal Ethics and Professional Conduct Council, the organization has neither prepared itself to handle the data related to thousands of cases submitted by each district attorney association, nor has it established procedures to analyze and determine whether the attorneys are guilty of corruption or ineffectiveness. It is therefore of dire importance that measures are established and procedures put into place. Today legal proceedings emphasize not only investigations and disciplinary actions, but can also involve the infringement of rights in such a way that it can be disadvantageous to the party or parties directly involved. Therefore,the systemization of procedures is important not only to create an efficient means by which to process work, but also to increase reliability and improve public views. The Legal Ethics Professional Conduct Council is classified as an official organization tasked with managing resources and providing manpower in association with three different government and private organizations including the Supreme Court, the Ministry of Justice, and the Korean Bar Association. In light of this the minimum requirement that must be met is the systemization and standardization of procedures and methodology for cases in order to provide reliability and ensure the Legal Ethics Professional Conduct Association’s system is consistant. The Legal Ethics Professional Conduct Council will only be able to continue to function as long as the cases it reviews are processed smoothly following the procedures and regulations established by the organization without disregard. This paper aims to research the analytical procedures and methodology pertaining to cases tried by attorneys who retired from public prosecutors and judges, and to systemize and increase efficiency of Legal Ethics Professional Conduct Council works. This paper will cover Legal Ethics and Professional Conduct Council procedures and issues such as receipt and enrollment of cases, primary screening, in depth investigations, analysis, and judgment as well as record keeping throughout the entire procedures. I look forward to having the opportunity to increase the nation’s level of trust and being able to secure a just legal system through effective work and public trust in spite of the limited support, lack of funding, and being understaffed.
Abstract
Legal Ethics and Professional Conduct Council was established on July 27th, 2007 to foster legal ethics and a sound legal climate. The goals of this national organization are to establish regular monitoring and analysis of legal ethics as well as establishing measures designed to curtail the practice of granting special legal privileges to former government legal officials. Though four years have passed since the establishment of the Legal Ethics and Professional Conduct Council, the organization has neither prepared itself to handle the data related to thousands of cases submitted by each district attorney association, nor has it established procedures to analyze and determine whether the attorneys are guilty of corruption or ineffectiveness. It is therefore of dire importance that measures are established and procedures put into place. Today legal proceedings emphasize not only investigations and disciplinary actions, but can also involve the infringement of rights in such a way that it can be disadvantageous to the party or parties directly involved. Therefore,the systemization of procedures is important not only to create an efficient means by which to process work, but also to increase reliability and improve public views. The Legal Ethics Professional Conduct Council is classified as an official organization tasked with managing resources and providing manpower in association with three different government and private organizations including the Supreme Court, the Ministry of Justice, and the Korean Bar Association. In light of this the minimum requirement that must be met is the systemization and standardization of procedures and methodology for cases in order to provide reliability and ensure the Legal Ethics Professional Conduct Association’s system is consistant. The Legal Ethics Professional Conduct Council will only be able to continue to function as long as the cases it reviews are processed smoothly following the procedures and regulations established by the organization without disregard. This paper aims to research the analytical procedures and methodology pertaining to cases tried by attorneys who retired from public prosecutors and judges, and to systemize and increase efficiency of Legal Ethics Professional Conduct Council works. This paper will cover Legal Ethics and Professional Conduct Council procedures and issues such as receipt and enrollment of cases, primary screening, in depth investigations, analysis, and judgment as well as record keeping throughout the entire procedures. I look forward to having the opportunity to increase the nation’s level of trust and being able to secure a just legal system through effective work and public trust in spite of the limited support, lack of funding, and being understaffed.
참고문헌 (23)
- 대한변호사협회, "법규집" (2009)
- 대한변호사협회, "변호사법축조해설" (2009)
- 박휴상, "법조윤리" (2010), fides 도서출판
- 법무연수원, "검찰실무Ⅰ" (2010)
- 사법연수원, "사법제도론" (2006)
- 사법연수원, "한국법조론" (2006)
- 사법연수원, "수사절차론" (2010)
- 사법연수원, "검찰실무Ⅰ·Ⅱ" (2010)
- 사법연수원, "검찰서류 작성례", ~ (2010)
- 서울대학교 법과대학, "법률가의 윤리와 책임" (2007), 박영사
- 이상수, "법조윤리의 이론과 실제" (2009), 서강대학교 출판부
- 이창희, "절차적 정의와 법의 지배" (2003), 박영사
- 정형근, "법조윤리강의" (2010), 박영사
- 최진안, "법조윤리" (2010), 세창출판사
- 한인섭, "법조윤리" (2010), 박영사
- 김영철, "법조윤리협의회의 운용현황과 발전방안", 토지공법연구, 54, pp.267~290 (2011), 한국토지공법학회
- 국가인권위원회, "조사구제메뉴얼", ~ (2006)
- 집중검토보고서(2007년 하반기), "법조윤리협의회", ~ (2008)
- 집중검토보고서(2008년 상반기2-1), "법조윤리협의회", ~ (2009)
- 집중검토보고서(2008년 상반기2-2), "법조윤리협의회", ~ (2009)
- 2008년 하반기 정밀심사검토보고서, "법조윤리협의회", ~ (2009)
- 법조윤리협의회, "현황 및 전문위원 업무처리참고자료", ~ (2009)
- 부패방지위원회, "신고심사업무편람", ~ (2004)
