An alternative technique for administration of local anesthesia to reduce pain during needle insertion
3
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: Pain control, which is necessary during most dental procedures, is administered by injection of local anesthesia. Because the injection itself is painful, the procedure designed to reduce pain needs to be studied. Little data regarding the reactions of children to dental needle insertion without useof topical anesthetics have been reported. This study was conducted in order to evaluate the effi cacy of a non-topical procedure as compared to the conventional insertion technique for alleviating pain in children receiving local anesthesia injections. Materials and Methods: As an alternative procedure for injection, the clean and dried loose tissue at the injection site was quickly and gently pulled or pushed over the tip of the needle by the dentist to a depth of 1 to 1.5 mm. When the needle entered the tissue by the end of the bevel of the needle tip, a few drops of solution were released, advancing the needle to the proper depth to continue release of drug. Results: For pain response, a signifi cant difference in Sound, Eye and Motor scale ratings (p<0.000) was observed between the alternative insertion technique (less painful) and the conventional one. And, for both boys and girls, no signifi cant difference in response was observed between maxilla and mandiblein both the alternative technique and the conventional technique groups. Conclusion: Use of this alternative technique can result in reduced discomfort in pediatric dental patients and allows for administration of a superfi cial injection of local anesthesia prior to advancement of the needle into deeper tissue. In addition,it is simple and quick to use, costs nothing, and can be quite effective when compared with the conventional method of needle insertion.
Abstract
Purpose: Pain control, which is necessary during most dental procedures, is administered by injection of local anesthesia. Because the injection itself is painful, the procedure designed to reduce pain needs to be studied. Little data regarding the reactions of children to dental needle insertion without useof topical anesthetics have been reported. This study was conducted in order to evaluate the effi cacy of a non-topical procedure as compared to the conventional insertion technique for alleviating pain in children receiving local anesthesia injections. Materials and Methods: As an alternative procedure for injection, the clean and dried loose tissue at the injection site was quickly and gently pulled or pushed over the tip of the needle by the dentist to a depth of 1 to 1.5 mm. When the needle entered the tissue by the end of the bevel of the needle tip, a few drops of solution were released, advancing the needle to the proper depth to continue release of drug. Results: For pain response, a signifi cant difference in Sound, Eye and Motor scale ratings (p<0.000) was observed between the alternative insertion technique (less painful) and the conventional one. And, for both boys and girls, no signifi cant difference in response was observed between maxilla and mandiblein both the alternative technique and the conventional technique groups. Conclusion: Use of this alternative technique can result in reduced discomfort in pediatric dental patients and allows for administration of a superfi cial injection of local anesthesia prior to advancement of the needle into deeper tissue. In addition,it is simple and quick to use, costs nothing, and can be quite effective when compared with the conventional method of needle insertion.
참고문헌 (9)
- Fukayama H, "Comparison of topical anesthesia of 20% benzocaine and 60% lidocaine gel", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 94, pp.157~161 (2002)
- Kohli K, "A survey of local and topical anesthesia use by pediatric dentists in the United States", Pediatr Dent, 23, pp.265~269 (2001)
- Kramp LF, "Evaluation of prilocaine for the reduction of pain associated with transmucosal anesthetic administration", Anesth Prog, 46, pp.52~55 (1999)
- Kreider KA, "Reducing children's injection pain: lidocaine patches versus topical benzocaine gel", Pediatr Dent, 23, pp.19~23 (2001)
- McDonald RE, "Local anesthesia for the child and adolescents, In Dentistry for the Child and Adolescent, 7th ed", pp.270~284 (2000), CV Mosby Co.
- Meechan JG, "Effective topical anesthetic agents and techniques", Dent Clin North Am, 46, pp.759~766 (2002)
- Nakanishi O, "Efficacy of mandibular topical anesthesia varies with the site of administration", Anesth Prog, 43, pp.14~19 (1996)
- Peretz B, "Dental anxiety among young adolescent patients in Israel", Int J Paediatr Dent, 10, pp.126~132 (2000)
- Wright GZ, "The effectiveness of infiltration anesthesia in the mandibular primary molar region", Pediatr Dent, 13, pp.278~283 (1991)
