Paranasal augmentation using Medpor® implant and changes in lateral profile
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to simultaneously evaluate soft tissue changes induced by bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible as well as paranasal augmentation using a Medpor® implant based on cephalometric radiography before and 6 months after surgery. Materials and Methods: We analyzed the increase in soft tissue volume in 20 patients diagnosed with mandibular advancement and midfacial depression between Feburary 2005 and Feburary 2009. Paranasal augmentation was performed using a 4.5mm-thick Medpor® implant, and lateral head radiographs were analyzed before and 6 months after surgery. Results: The increase in soft tissue volume was 3.27±1.16 mm, which was 72.67% of the actual thickness. After surgery, no particular complication was detected, and the results were acceptable to the patients and surgeons. Based on these results, the Medpor®implant is a satisfactory artificial graft material for use in facial augmentation. Conclusion: Paranasal augmentation using the Medpor® implant can be considered a good surgical option that can maximize the aesthetics of a patient’s face.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to simultaneously evaluate soft tissue changes induced by bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible as well as paranasal augmentation using a Medpor® implant based on cephalometric radiography before and 6 months after surgery. Materials and Methods: We analyzed the increase in soft tissue volume in 20 patients diagnosed with mandibular advancement and midfacial depression between Feburary 2005 and Feburary 2009. Paranasal augmentation was performed using a 4.5mm-thick Medpor® implant, and lateral head radiographs were analyzed before and 6 months after surgery. Results: The increase in soft tissue volume was 3.27±1.16 mm, which was 72.67% of the actual thickness. After surgery, no particular complication was detected, and the results were acceptable to the patients and surgeons. Based on these results, the Medpor®implant is a satisfactory artificial graft material for use in facial augmentation. Conclusion: Paranasal augmentation using the Medpor® implant can be considered a good surgical option that can maximize the aesthetics of a patient’s face.
참고문헌 (27)
- Nocini PF, "Gridplan midfacial analysis for alloplastic implants at the time of jaw surgery", Plast Reconstr Surg, 123, pp.670~679 (2009)
- Rosen HM, "Facial skeletal expansion: treatment strategies and rationale", Plast Reconstr Surg, 89, pp.798~808 (1992)
- Rosen HM, "Maxillary advancement for mandibular progna-thism: indications and rationale", Plast Reconstr Surg, 87, pp.823~832 (1991)
- Converse JM, "Technique of bone grafting for contour restora-tion of the face", Plast Reconstr Surg (1946), 14, pp.332~346 (1954)
- Jackson IT, "Total surgical management of Binder's syndrome", Ann Plast Surg, 7, pp.25~34 (1981)
- Wang S, "Orbital floor reconstruction: a retrospective study of 21 cases", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 106, pp.324~330 (2008)
- Kim SJ, "Midifacial changes following the paranasal augmentation with alloplastic medpor", J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg, 18, pp.177~183 (1996)
- Yaremchuk MJ, "Making concave faces convex", Aesthetic Plast Surg, 29, pp.141~147 (2005)
- Chen CT, "Reconstruction of traumatic nasal deformity in Orientals", J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 63, pp.257~264 (2010)
- Niechajev I, "Porous polyethylene implants for nasal reconstruction: clinical and histologic studies", Aesthetic Plast Surg, 23, pp.395~402 (1999)
- Sheen JH, "Problems in secondary rhinoplasty, In Aesthetic rhinoplasty", pp.1314~ (1987), Mosby
- Owsley TG, "The use of Gore-Tex for nasal augmentation: a retrospective analysis of 106 patients", Plast Reconstr Surg, 94, pp.241~248 (1994)
- Berghaus A, "Porous polyethylene and proplast: their behavior in a bony implant bed", Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 240, pp.115~123 (1984)
- Rubin JP, "Complications and toxicities of implantable biomaterials used in facial reconstructive and aesthetic surgery: a comprehensive review of the literature", Plast Reconstr Surg, 100, pp.1336~1353 (1997)
- Yaremchuk MJ, "Paranasal implants for correction of midface concavity", Plast Reconstr Surg, 102, pp.1676~1684 (1998)
- Yaremchuk MJ, "Infraorbital rim augmentation", Plast Reconstr Surg, 107, pp.1585~1592 (2001)
- Yaremchuk MJ, "Mandibular augmentation", Plast Reconstr Surg, 106, pp.697~706 (2000)
- Klawitter JJ, "An evaluation of bone growth into porous high density polyethylene", J Biomed Mater Res, 10, pp.311~323 (1976)
- Wellisz T, "Clinical experience with the Medpor porous polyethylene implant", Aesthetic Plast Surg, 17, pp.339~344 (1993)
- Yaremchuk MJ, "Facial skeletal reconstruction using porous polyethylene implants", Plast Reconstr Surg, 111, pp.1818~1827 (2003)
- Maas CS, "Comparison of biomaterials for facial bone augmentation", Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 116, pp.551~556 (1990)
- Breitbart AS, "Implant materials, In Grabb and Smith’s plastic surgery", pp.39~ (1997), Lippicott-Raven
- Semergidis TG, "Alloplastic augmentation of the mandibular angle", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 54, pp.1417~1423 (1996)
- Rubin PA, "Orbital reconstruction using porous polyethylene sheets", Ophthalmology, 101, pp.1697~1708 (1994)
- Neovius E, "Craniofacial reconstruction with bone and biomaterials: review over the last 11 years", J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 63, pp.1615~1623 (2010)
- Menderes A, "Craniofacial reconstruction with high-density porous polyethylene implants", J Craniofac Surg, 15, pp.719~724 (2004)
- Gosau M, "Facial augmentation with porous polyethylene (Medpor)--histological evidence of intense foreign body reaction", J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 87, pp.83~87 (2008)