Sagittal split ramus osteotomy, intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy, and lateral corticectomy for asymmetric mandibular prognathism
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the postoperative anteroposterior stability and improvements in facial asymmetry after performing LeFort I osteotomy in the maxilla, sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) in the mandible, and lateral corticectomy on the IVRO side. Materials and Methods: From July 2009 to October 2018, a retrospective analysis was performed on 11 subjects. Lateral cephalometric radiograph was performed preoperatively (T0), postoperatively (T1), and at 12 months of follow-up (T2), and the B point distance was measured. Posteroanterior cephalometric radiograph was performed preoperatively (S0) and at 12 months of follow-up (S1) and was used to measure five indicators (Ag angle, M-Ag, Co-Ag, Co-Me, and Ag-Me) of facial asymmetry. Results: The B point distances for T0 and T1 were significantly different (P=0.007), whereas those for T1 and T2 were not significantly different (P=0.1). In addition, there was a significant difference between the B point distances of T2 and T0 (P=0.026). Comparison of the facial asymmetry indicators before and after surgery showed a significant difference for all indicators between S0 and S1: the P-values of Ag angle, M-Ag, Co-Ag, Co-Me, and Ag-Me were 0.003, 0.003, 0.008, 0.006, and 0.004, respectively. The Z value was based on negative ranks. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in the B point distances from postoperation to the 12-month follow-up. However, there were significant differences in all five indicators related to facial asymmetry before and after surgery. The values for the five indicators of facial asymmetry all increased postoperatively.
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the postoperative anteroposterior stability and improvements in facial asymmetry after performing LeFort I osteotomy in the maxilla, sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) in the mandible, and lateral corticectomy on the IVRO side. Materials and Methods: From July 2009 to October 2018, a retrospective analysis was performed on 11 subjects. Lateral cephalometric radiograph was performed preoperatively (T0), postoperatively (T1), and at 12 months of follow-up (T2), and the B point distance was measured. Posteroanterior cephalometric radiograph was performed preoperatively (S0) and at 12 months of follow-up (S1) and was used to measure five indicators (Ag angle, M-Ag, Co-Ag, Co-Me, and Ag-Me) of facial asymmetry. Results: The B point distances for T0 and T1 were significantly different (P=0.007), whereas those for T1 and T2 were not significantly different (P=0.1). In addition, there was a significant difference between the B point distances of T2 and T0 (P=0.026). Comparison of the facial asymmetry indicators before and after surgery showed a significant difference for all indicators between S0 and S1: the P-values of Ag angle, M-Ag, Co-Ag, Co-Me, and Ag-Me were 0.003, 0.003, 0.008, 0.006, and 0.004, respectively. The Z value was based on negative ranks. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in the B point distances from postoperation to the 12-month follow-up. However, there were significant differences in all five indicators related to facial asymmetry before and after surgery. The values for the five indicators of facial asymmetry all increased postoperatively.
참고문헌 (22)
- 윤현정, "청소년의 외모 관련 사회적 압박감, 신체상 불만족이 정신건강에 미치는 영향", 가정간호학회지, 27(1), pp.92~101 (2020), 한국가정간호학회[DOI]
- Gillian Rhodes, "Facial symmetry and the perception of beauty", Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5(4), pp.659~669 (1998), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Jeffrey W. Beyer, "Evaluation of dental midline position", Seminars in Orthodontics, 4(3), pp.146~152 (1998), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Gye Hyeong Lee, "Studies of Relationship between P-A Cephalometric Measurements and Vidual Facial Asymmetry", Korean Journal of Physical Anthropology, 11(1), pp.41~ (1998), Korean Association of Physical Anthropologists[DOI]
- 2.0.CO;2,
- TarulathaR Shyagali, "Evaluation of facial asymmetry in esthetically pleasing faces", Journal of Orthodontic Research, 2(2), pp.79~ (2014), CLOCKSS Archive[DOI]
- Vig PS, "Asymmetry of the human facial skeleton", Angle Orthod, 45, pp.125~129 (1975)[DOI]
- Talat Al-Gunaid, "Postoperative stability of bimaxillary surgery in Class III patients with mandibular protrusion and mandibular deviation: a frontal cephalometric study", International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 37(11), pp.992~998 (2008), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Lai W, "Postoperative mandibular stability after orthognathic surgery in patients with mandibular protrusion and mandibular deviation", Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, 17, pp.13~22 (2002)
- Jee-Ho Lee, "Unilateral intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy and sagittal split ramus osteotomy for the treatment of asymmetric mandibles", 대한구강악안면외과학회지, 41(2), pp.102~108 (2015), 대한구강악안면외과학회
- 이상훈, "Combination Surgery (USSRO + UIVRO)를 이용한 비대칭을 동반한 골격성 III급 부정교합의 악교정수술 치험례", 대한치과교정학회 임상저널, 9(3), pp.178~188 (2019), 대한치과교정학회[DOI]
- Proffit WR, "Stability after surgical-orthodontic correction of skeletal class III malocclusion. 2. Maxillary advancement", Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, 6, pp.71~80 (1991)
- Gundega Jakobsone, "Three-year follow-up of bimaxillary surgery to correct skeletal Class III malocclusion: Stability and risk factors for relapse", American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 139(1), pp.80~89 (2011), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Talat Al-Gunaid, "Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Japanese class III asymmetric patients", Journal of Orthodontic Science, 1(3), pp.69~ (2012), Medknow[DOI]
- Robert M. Ricketts, "An overview of computerized cephalometrics", American Journal of Orthodontics, 61(1), pp.1~28 (1972), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Grummons DC, "A frontal asymmetry analysis", J Clin Orthod, 21, pp.448~465 (1987)
- 황현식, "안면비대칭자의 하악골 악교정수술 후 정면 연조직 변화 예측을 위한 연구", 대한치과교정학회지, 38(4), pp.252~264 (2008), 대한치과교정학회
- Major PW, "Landmark identification error in posterior anterior cephalometrics", Angle Orthod, 64, pp.447~454 (1994)[DOI]
- Baek SM, "The prominent mandibular angle : preoperative management, operative technique, and results in 42 patients", Plast Reconstr Surg, 83, pp.272~280 (1989)
- Masami Deguchi, "Angle-Splitting Ostectomy for Reducing the Width of the Lower Face", Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 99(7), pp.1831~1839 (1997), Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)[DOI]
- Hoon Jin, "Mandibular Angle Reduction versus Mandible Reduction", Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, pp.1263~1269 (2004), Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)[DOI]
- Kihwan Han, "Reduction Mandibuloplasty: Ostectomy of the Lateral Cortex Around the Mandibular Angle", Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 12(4), pp.314~325 (2001), Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)[DOI]