Case series of maxillary anterior bone augmentation with a novel biphasic calcium phosphate: a clinical and radiographic pilot study
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this pilot case series was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of employing newly developed alloplastic biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) in guided bone regeneration (GBR) for maxillary anterior peri-implant defects. Six peri-implant dehiscence defects were grafted with BCP. For all included treatment sites, clinical (defect width [DW] and defect height [DH]), radiographic (horizontal hard tissue thickness [HT]), patient discomfort, and early wound healing outcomes were evaluated. At reentry surgery, all surgical sites indicated a change in DW, DH, HT0, HT1, HT2, and HT3 from 4.08±1.39 mm to 1.13±1.76 mm, 3.57±1.42 mm to 0.58±1.09 mm, 2.18±0.66 mm to 1.50±0.53 mm, 2.11±0.57 mm to 1.73±0.28 mm, 2.22±0.54 mm to 1.75±0.26 mm, and 2.63±0.87 mm to 1.83±0.46 mm, respectively. Significant differences were discovered between paired DW and DH (p<0.05), whereas radiographic parameters had no significant differences. The severity of pain and swelling was 4.8±1.9 and 6.5±1.9, respectively, and the duration of pain and swelling was 4.5±3.8 and 5.8±2.9 days, respectively, according to early postoperative discomfort assessment. No adverse reactions occurred at any treatment site. In terms of clinical and radiographic outcomes, the newly developed BCP is acceptable biocompatible and suitable for the GBR of maxillary anterior peri-implant dehiscence defects within the limitations of this study.
Abstract
The purpose of this pilot case series was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of employing newly developed alloplastic biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) in guided bone regeneration (GBR) for maxillary anterior peri-implant defects. Six peri-implant dehiscence defects were grafted with BCP. For all included treatment sites, clinical (defect width [DW] and defect height [DH]), radiographic (horizontal hard tissue thickness [HT]), patient discomfort, and early wound healing outcomes were evaluated. At reentry surgery, all surgical sites indicated a change in DW, DH, HT0, HT1, HT2, and HT3 from 4.08±1.39 mm to 1.13±1.76 mm, 3.57±1.42 mm to 0.58±1.09 mm, 2.18±0.66 mm to 1.50±0.53 mm, 2.11±0.57 mm to 1.73±0.28 mm, 2.22±0.54 mm to 1.75±0.26 mm, and 2.63±0.87 mm to 1.83±0.46 mm, respectively. Significant differences were discovered between paired DW and DH (p<0.05), whereas radiographic parameters had no significant differences. The severity of pain and swelling was 4.8±1.9 and 6.5±1.9, respectively, and the duration of pain and swelling was 4.5±3.8 and 5.8±2.9 days, respectively, according to early postoperative discomfort assessment. No adverse reactions occurred at any treatment site. In terms of clinical and radiographic outcomes, the newly developed BCP is acceptable biocompatible and suitable for the GBR of maxillary anterior peri-implant dehiscence defects within the limitations of this study.
참고문헌 (25)
- Clementini M, "Success rate of dental implants inserted in horizontal and vertical guided bone regenerated areas : a systematic review", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 41, pp.847~852 (2012)[DOI]
- Elgali I, "Guided bone regeneration : materials and biological mechanisms revisited", Eur J Oral Sci, 125, pp.315~337 (2017)[DOI]
- Couso-Queiruga E, "Post-extraction dimensional changes : a systematic review and meta-analysis", J Clin Periodontol, 48, pp.126~144 (2021)[DOI]
- Lee JH, "Comparative assessment of anterior maxillary alveolar ridge preservation with and without adjunctive use of enamel matrix derivative : a randomized clinical trial", Clin Oral Implants Res, 31, pp.1~9 (2020)[DOI]
- Jung EH, "Augmentation stability and early wound healing outcomes of guided bone regeneration in peri-implant dehiscence defects with L-and I-shaped soft block bone substitutes : a clinical and radiographic study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 32, pp.1308~1317 (2021)[DOI]
- Chen ST, "Clinical and esthetic outcomes of implants placed in postextraction sites", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 24(Suppl), pp.186~217 (2009)
- Gakonyo J, "Cone beam computed tomography assessment of the buccal bone thickness in anterior maxillary teeth : relevance to immediate implant placement", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 33, pp.880~887 (2018)[DOI]
- Fukuba S, "Alloplastic bone substitutes for periodontal and bone regeneration in dentistry: current status and prospects", Materials (Basel), 14, pp.1096~ (2021)[DOI]
- Shamsoddin E, "Biomaterial selection for bone augmentation in implant dentistry : a systematic review", J Adv Pharm Technol Res, 10, pp.46~50 (2019)[DOI]
- Bouler JM, "Biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics for bone reconstruction : a review of biological response", Acta Biomater, 53, pp.1~12 (2017)[DOI]
- Friedmann A, "Tissue reactions after simultaneous alveolar ridge augmentation with biphasic calcium phosphate and implant insertion--histological and immunohistochemical evaluation in humans", Clin Oral Investig, 19, pp.1595~1603 (2015)[DOI]
- Kitayama S, "Regeneration of rabbit calvarial defects using biphasic calcium phosphate and a strontium hydroxyapatite-containing collagen membrane", Clin Oral Implants Res, 27, pp.e206~e214 (2016)[DOI]
- Yang C, "Osteoconductivity and biodegradation of synthetic bone substitutes with different tricalcium phosphate contents in rabbits", J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 102, pp.80~88 (2014)[DOI]
- Kraus RD, "Sinus floor elevation with biphasic calcium phosphate or deproteinized bovine bone mineral : clinical and histomorphometric outcomes of a randomized controlled clinical trial", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 35, pp.1005~1012 (2020)[DOI]
- Čandrlić M, "Comparison of injectable biphasic calcium phosphate and a bovine xenograft in socket preservation : qualitative and quantitative histologic study in humans", Int J Mol Sci, 23, pp.2539~ (2022)[DOI]
- Dahlin C, "Bone tissue modelling and remodelling following guided bone regeneration in combination with biphasic calcium phosphate materials presenting different microporosity", Clin Oral Implants Res, 26, pp.814~822 (2015)[DOI]
- Struillou X, "The association of hydrogel and biphasic calcium phosphate in the treatment of dehiscence-type peri-implant defects : an experimental study in dogs", J Mater Sci Mater Med, 24, pp.2749~2760 (2013)[DOI]
- Arunjaroensuk S, "The stability of augmented bone between two different membranes used for guided bone regeneration simultaneous with dental implant placement in the esthetic zone", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 33, pp.206~216 (2018)[DOI]
- Cortes AR, "Correction of buccal dehiscence at the time of implant placement without barrier membranes : a retrospective cone beam computed tomographic study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 28, pp.1564~1569 (2013)[DOI]
- Tumedei M, "Synthetic blocks for bone regeneration : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Int J Mol Sci, 20, pp.4221~ (2019)[DOI]
- Papageorgiou SN, "Comparative effectiveness of natural and synthetic bone grafts in oral and maxillofacial surgery prior to insertion of dental implants : systematic review and network metaanalysis of parallel and cluster randomized controlled trials", J Dent, 48, pp.1~8 (2016)[DOI]
- LeGeros RZ, "Biphasic calcium phosphate bioceramics : preparation, properties and applications", J Mater Sci Mater Med, 14, pp.201~209 (2003)[DOI]
- Ebrahimi M, "Biphasic calcium phosphates bioceramics(HA", TCP) : concept, physicochemical properties and the impact of standardization of study protocols in biomaterials research, 2017, pp.71, 1293~1312
- Chen H, "Evaluation of hard tissue 3-dimensional stability around single implants placed with guided bone regeneration in the anterior maxilla : a 3-year retrospective study", J Prosthet Dent (2021)[DOI]
- Liu R, "Immediate implant placement for a single anterior maxillary tooth with a facial bone wall defect : a prospective clinical study with a one-year follow-up period", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 21, pp.1164~1174 (2019)[DOI]