본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Consideration on the Plebeian Assembly System in Mid-Republican Rome

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The aim of this article is to discuss the traditional view that the political role of the plebeians, the theoretical sovereignty in the plebeian assembly, was structurally hindered in Mid-Republican Rome. For this, I have reinvestigated into the frequency of assemblies, the assembly procedure, and the group voting, which are the theoretical basis of the traditional viewpoints. In conclusion, there is no evidence to verify that these institutional mechanisms were designed to limit the popular participation. Rather they may have encouraged and allowed the plebeians to participate into the assemblies. Therefore, the traditional views overemphasizing that the popular participation was structurally restricted by institutional mechanisms should be modified. However, my ultimate aim is not to determine whether plebeians’ participation into assembly was structurally limited or not. We need to seek for a new paradigm to address the Roman politics in the Mid-Roman Republic, so that future discussions about it can be a progressive one. It is high time, in other words, that we should rather focus on the network of political conversations between the political elite and the masses rather than focus on whose political powers were greater in the plebeian assemblies. In this sense, it is worth noting Nicolet’s statement “the Roman system implied a certain degree of communication, not all of it one-way, between the masses and the political class.”

Abstract

The aim of this article is to discuss the traditional view that the political role of the plebeians, the theoretical sovereignty in the plebeian assembly, was structurally hindered in Mid-Republican Rome. For this, I have reinvestigated into the frequency of assemblies, the assembly procedure, and the group voting, which are the theoretical basis of the traditional viewpoints. In conclusion, there is no evidence to verify that these institutional mechanisms were designed to limit the popular participation. Rather they may have encouraged and allowed the plebeians to participate into the assemblies. Therefore, the traditional views overemphasizing that the popular participation was structurally restricted by institutional mechanisms should be modified. However, my ultimate aim is not to determine whether plebeians’ participation into assembly was structurally limited or not. We need to seek for a new paradigm to address the Roman politics in the Mid-Roman Republic, so that future discussions about it can be a progressive one. It is high time, in other words, that we should rather focus on the network of political conversations between the political elite and the masses rather than focus on whose political powers were greater in the plebeian assemblies. In this sense, it is worth noting Nicolet’s statement “the Roman system implied a certain degree of communication, not all of it one-way, between the masses and the political class.”

참고문헌 (48)

  1. Astin, A. E., "Leges Aelia et Fufia", Latomus, 23(3) (1964)
  2. Bell, Andrew J. E., "Review of Millar 1998 and Laser 1997", The Journal of Roman Studies, 90 (2000)
  3. Bleicken, Jochen, "Das Volkstribunat der klassischen Republik: Studien zu seiner Entwicklung zwischen 287 und 133 v. Chr." (1968), Zetamata
  4. Bleicken, Jochen, "Lex Publica : Gesetz und Recht in der roemischen Republik" (1975), De Gruyter
  5. Broughton, Thomas Robert Shannon, "The Magistrates of the Roman Republic, vol.I" (1951), American Philological Academy
  6. Brunt, Peter Astbury, "Italian Manpower 225 BC-AD 14" (1971), Clarendon Press
  7. Cornell, Tim J, "The Beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (c.1000-264BC)" (1995), Routledge
  8. Develin, R., "Comitia tributa plebis", Athenaeum, 53 (1975)
  9. Develin, R., "Comitia Tributa Again", Athenaeum, 55 (1977)
  10. Drummond, A., "Cambridge Ancient History VII.2" (1989), Cambridge University Press
  11. Farrall, J., "The Distinction between Comitia and Concilium", Athenaeum, 64 (1986)
  12. Feig Vishnia, "Society and Popular Leaders in Mid-Republican Rome 241-167 BC" (1996), Routledge
  13. Grieve, Lucy J., "The Reform of the Comitia Centuriata", Historia, 34(3) (1985)
  14. Hall, Ursula, "Voting Procedure in Roman Assemblies", Historia, 13(3) (1964)
  15. Hall, Ursula, "Owls to Athens: Essays on Classical Subjects Presented to Sir Kenneth Dover ed" (1990), Oxford University Press
  16. Hopkins, Keith, "Conquerors and Slaves" (1978), Cambridge University Press
  17. Kim, Kyunghyun, "The Reform of the Comitia Centuriata in the Third Century BC", The Journal of Classical Studies, 8 (2000)
  18. 김경현, "An Inquiry on the Two Laws of the Plebeian Institutions in the early Roman Republic", 서양고전학연구, (36), pp.23~42 (2009), 한국서양고전학회
  19. 김경현, "Popular Participation in Comitia and Contiones in the Middle Roman Republic", 서양고대사연구, (33), pp.165~190 (2012), 한국서양고대역사문화학회
  20. Lintott, Andrew, "Democracy in the Middle Republic", Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung fuer Rechtsgeschichte, 104(1) (1987)
  21. Lintott, Andrew, "The Constitution of the Roman Republic" (1999), Clarendon Press
  22. Michels, Agnes Kirsopp, "The Calendar of the Roman Republic" (1967), Princeton University Press
  23. Millar, Fergus, "The Political Character of the Classical Roman Republic, 200-151 B.C.", The Journal of Roman Studies, 74 (1984)
  24. Millar Fergus, "Politics, Persuasion and the People before the Social War(150-90 B. C.)", The Journal of Roman Studies, 76 (1986)
  25. Millar Fergus, "Political Power in Mid-Republican Rome : Curia or Comitium?", The Journal of Roman Studies, 79 (1989)
  26. Millar, Fergus, "The Crowd in Rome in the Late Republic" (1998), The University of Michigan Press
  27. Mouritsen, Henrik, "Plebs and Politics in the Late Roman Republic" (2001), Cambridge University Press
  28. Nicolet, Claude, "The World of the Citizen in Republican Rome" (1980), Routledge
  29. North, John A., "Democratic Politics in Republican Rome", Past & Present, (126) (1990)
  30. Ogilvie, Robert Maxwell, "A Commentary on Livy, Books 1-5" (1965), Clarendon Press
  31. Pina Polo, Francisco, "Procedures and Functions of Civil and Military Contiones in Rome", Klio, 77 (1995)
  32. Rotondi, Giovanni, "Leges Publicae Populi Romani" (1966), Georg Olms Verlagsbuch
  33. Scullard, Howard Hayes, "A History of the Roman World, 753-146 BC" (1980), Routledge
  34. Scullard, Howard Hayes, "Festivals and Ceremonies of the Roman Republic" (1981), Routledge
  35. Sherwin-White, Adrian Nicholas, "The Roman Citizenship" (1973), Oxford University Press
  36. Staveley, E. S., "The Role of the First Voter in Roman Legislative Assemblies", Historia, 18(5) (1969)
  37. Sumner, G. V., "Lex Aelia, lex Fufia", The American Journal of Philology, 84(4) (1963)
  38. Tatum, W. Jeffrey, "The Patrician Tribune Publius Clodius Pulcher" (1999), The University of North Carolina
  39. Taylor, Lily Ross, "The Centuriate Assembly before and after the Reform", The American Journal of Philology, 78(4) (1957)
  40. Taylor, Lily Ross, "The Voting Districts of the Roman Republic" (1960), The American Academy
  41. Taylor, Lily Ross, "Forerunners of the Gracchi", The Journal of Roman Studies, 52 (1962)
  42. Taylor, Lily Ross, "Roman Voting Assemblies from the Hannibalic War to the Dictatorship of Caesar" (1966), The University of Michigan Press
  43. Toynbee, A. J., "Hannibal’s Legacy: The Hannibalic War’s Effects on Roman Life, 2 vols." (1965), Oxford University Press
  44. Treggiari, Susan, "Roman Freedmen during the Late Republic" (1969), Clarendon Press
  45. Weinrib, E. J., "Obnuntiatio : two problems", Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung fuer Rechtsgeschichte, 87(1) (1970)
  46. Wiseman, T. Peter, "Democracy alla romana", The Journal of Roman Archaeology, 12 (1999)
  47. Yakobson, Alexander, "Secret Ballot and its Effects in the Late Roman Republic", Hermes, 123(4) (1995)
  48. Yakobson, Alexander, "Elections and Electioneering in Rome" (1999), Franz Steiner Verlag Stuttgart

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)