遺留分 侵害額의 算定方法에 관한 小考 - 相續에 의해 取得한 積極財産額의 算定方法을 중심으로 -
Calculation of the Amount of Legally Secured Portions Infringed by an Ancestor's Bequest or Donation
0
조회
0
다운로드
21
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Property possessed by means of succession by the right holder of legally secured portions should be calculated based not on statutory shares in succession but on the right holder’s specific shares in succession. Considering that the purpose of recognizing legally secured portions is to secure the legal minimum of assumed shares, the critical question with regard to the claim of return of legally secured portions can be said to be the actual property gained by the right holder. Therefore, in calculating the property earned by the right holder through succession, it would be appropriate to calculate the property based on specific shares in succession that can actually be earned by the right holder by division of inherited property. Moreover based on the fact that article 1118 of the civil code applies article 1008 mutatis mutandis, since there is hardly any argument against the view that the special gift received by a coheir should be included in the basic property for legally secured portions without any time limits as provided for in article 1114, it would be in the spirit of article 1118 to base the calculation of the right holder’s property gained through succession on his specific shares in succession, considering the special gift according to article 1008. Where there is a coheir who received a special gift, calculating the amount of legally secured portions infringed by an ancestor’s bequest or donation has been based, as is the view of this paper, on specific shares in succession in lower court cases. However there doesn’t seem to be any such Supreme court decisions. This author hopes and expects the Supreme court to base its decision in the future on the right holder’s specific shares in succession, in line with the purpose of legally secured portions.
Abstract
Property possessed by means of succession by the right holder of legally secured portions should be calculated based not on statutory shares in succession but on the right holder’s specific shares in succession. Considering that the purpose of recognizing legally secured portions is to secure the legal minimum of assumed shares, the critical question with regard to the claim of return of legally secured portions can be said to be the actual property gained by the right holder. Therefore, in calculating the property earned by the right holder through succession, it would be appropriate to calculate the property based on specific shares in succession that can actually be earned by the right holder by division of inherited property. Moreover based on the fact that article 1118 of the civil code applies article 1008 mutatis mutandis, since there is hardly any argument against the view that the special gift received by a coheir should be included in the basic property for legally secured portions without any time limits as provided for in article 1114, it would be in the spirit of article 1118 to base the calculation of the right holder’s property gained through succession on his specific shares in succession, considering the special gift according to article 1008. Where there is a coheir who received a special gift, calculating the amount of legally secured portions infringed by an ancestor’s bequest or donation has been based, as is the view of this paper, on specific shares in succession in lower court cases. However there doesn’t seem to be any such Supreme court decisions. This author hopes and expects the Supreme court to base its decision in the future on the right holder’s specific shares in succession, in line with the purpose of legally secured portions.
참고문헌 (52)
- 곽윤직, "상속법" (1997), 박영사
- 김용한, "친족상속법" (2003), 박영사
- 김주수ㆍ김상용, "친족ㆍ상속법 -가족법" (2008), 법문사
- 김형배, "민법학 -단답식 문제해설" (2007), 신조사
- 박병호, "가족법" (1991), 한국방송통신대학교 출판부
- 이경희, "유류분제도" (1995), 삼지원
- 이경희, "가족법" (2008), 법원사
- 지원림, "민법연습" (2007), 홍문사
- 곽동헌, "민법학의 회고와 전망" (1993), 한국사법행정학회
- 김능환, ": 상속법의 제문제" (1998), 법원도서관
- 김소영, "상속재산분할, 민사판례연구 제25권" (2003), 민사판례연구회
- 김운호, ": 상속법의 제문제" (1998), 법원도서관
- 박병호, "상속분에 관한 제문제 in 가족법논집" (1996), 진원
- 박태준, "심판에 의한 상속재산 분할", 법조, 49(2) (2000), 법조협회
- 변동열, "상속재산분할과 유류분반환청구", 법조, 47(3) (1998), 법조협회
- 변동열, "유류분 제도, 민사판례연구 제25권" (2003), 민사판례연구회
- 오병철, "유류분 부족액의 구체적 산정방법에 관한 연구", 가족법연구, 20(2) (2006), 한국가족법학회
- 윤진수, "상속재산 분할에 있어서 초과특별수익의 취급", 판례월보, (333) (1998), 판례월보사
- 윤진수, "초과특별수익이 있는 경우 구체적 상속분의 산정방법", 38(2) (1997), 서울대학교 법학
- 윤진수, "유류분 침해액의 산정방법", 48(3) (2007), 서울대학교 법학연구소
- 이규진, "특별수익자의 상속분의 산정과 유류분의 산정", 판례연구, 1 (1997), 제주판례연구회
- 이진만, "유류분의 산정", 민사판례연구, 19 (1997), 민사판례연구회
- 이희영, "유류분 산정방법, 민사재판의 제문제", 9 (1997), 민사실무연구회
- 임완규ㆍ김소영, ": 가정법원사건의 제문제" (1993), 법원도서관
- 정구태, "유류분반환청구권이 채권자대위권의 목적이 되는지 여부 -일본에서의 논의를 바탕으로 한 종래 국내의 통설에 대한 비판적 검토", 가족법연구, 22(1) (2008), 한국가족법학회
- 정구태, "유류분반환청구권의 법적 성질에 대한 시론적 고찰 -방법론적 관점에서 본 물권적 형성권설과 채권적 형성권설의 통합적 이해", 동아법학, (42) (2008), 동아대학교 법학연구소
- 정구태, "유류분반환청구권의 행사기간에 관한 제문제 -물권적 형성권설과 채권적 형성권설의 통합적 이해를 바탕으로 하여", 안암법학, (27) (2008), 안암법학회
- 황정규, ": 가정법원사건의 제문제 상" (2003), 법원도서관
- 島津一郞, "基本法コンメンタ一ル 相續" (2007), 日本評論社
- 鈴木祿彌, "相續法講義" (1996), 創文社
- 遠藤, ": 相續" (2005), 有斐閣
- 伊藤昌司, "相續法" (2002), 有斐閣
- 潮見佳男, "相續法" (2005), 弘文堂
- 橋詰, "共同相續人の死亡と相續分の承繼, 判例タイムズ" (2005), タイムズ
- 瀨川信久, "相續債務がある場合の遺留分侵害額の算定方法, 家族法判例百選" (2002), 有斐閣
- 梅本吉彦, "具體的相續分の價額又は割合の確認の利益, 家族法判例百選" (2002), 有斐閣
- 梶村太市, "相續が開始して遺産分割未了の間に第2次の相續が開始した場合において 第2次被相續人から特別受益を受けた者があるときの持戾しの要否?, 判例タイムズ" (2007), 判例タイムズ社
- 山崎賢一, ": 總論?家事審判戶籍" (1980), 有斐閣
- 森野俊彦, ": 遺産分割" (1998), 新日本法規出版
- 神谷, "遺留分および遺留分侵害額の算定方法, 遺言と遺留分 第2卷: 遺留分" (2003), 日本評論社
- 奧山恭子, "相續が開始して遺産分割未了の間に第二次の相續が開始した場合におい て第二次被相續人から特別受益を受けたものがあるときの持戾の要否, 判例時報" (2006), 判例時報社
- 伊藤昌司, "相續分ㆍ遺留分の算定と持?しㆍ持?し免除", 法政究, 58(4) (1992), 九州大學法政學會
- 伊藤昌司, "被相續人が相續開始時に債務を有していた場合における遺留分の侵害額の算定", 判例時報, (1606) (1997), 判例時報社
- 伊藤昌司, "(親族法ㆍ相續法)" (1998), 有斐閣
- 伊藤昌司, "共同相續と遺留分減殺, 現代民法學の理論と實務の交錯(高木多喜男先生 古稀記念論文集" (2001), 成文堂
- 伊藤昌司, "遺留分權利者と受遺者(=相續人)間の‘共有’關係の解消", 法政究, 68(1) (2001), 九州大學法政學會
- 長 秀之, (2008), 新日本法規出版
- 田中恒朗, "遺産分割の前提問題 -訴訟と審判との交錯", 判例タイムズ, 26(9) (1975), 判例タイムズ社
- 潮見佳男, ": 遺留分-遺産分割との?わ りにおいて(日本家族《社會と法》學會" (2003), 日本加除出版
- 川 淳一, "遺産分割前に死亡した相續人が有していた第1次被相續人の遺産について の權利", ジュリスト, (1313) (2006), 有斐閣
- 靑野洋士, "相續が開始して遺産分割未了の間に第2次の相續が開始した場合において第2次被相續人から特別受益を受けた者があるときの持戾しの與否", ジュリスト, (1343) (2007), 有斐閣
- 浦野由紀子, "特別受益者への贈與と遺留分減殺の對象, 家族法判例百選" (2002), 有斐閣