본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

전치사구와 국면

Prepositional Phrase and Phase

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

The purpose of this study is to apply the Phase Impenetrability Condition to constructions with prepositional phrases and suggest a revision of the notion of phases. In the recent version of the Phase Impenetrability Condition, the phases are confined to transitive verb phrases and complementizer phrases. This definition may hold for constructions with complement prepositional phrases, but may not hold for constructions with adjunct prepositional phrases. For the solution of these problems, the notion of phases is extended to cover not only transitive verb phrases and complementizer phrases, but also adjunct prepositional phrases. The new definition will enable the Phase Impenetrability Conditions to account for a wider range of constructions.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to apply the Phase Impenetrability Condition to constructions with prepositional phrases and suggest a revision of the notion of phases. In the recent version of the Phase Impenetrability Condition, the phases are confined to transitive verb phrases and complementizer phrases. This definition may hold for constructions with complement prepositional phrases, but may not hold for constructions with adjunct prepositional phrases. For the solution of these problems, the notion of phases is extended to cover not only transitive verb phrases and complementizer phrases, but also adjunct prepositional phrases. The new definition will enable the Phase Impenetrability Conditions to account for a wider range of constructions.

참고문헌 (10)

  1. Chomsky, N, "Beyond Explanatory Adequacy", MITWPL, 20 (2001)
  2. Chomsky, N, "Beyond Explanatory Adequacy.In Belletti(ed.)", ~ (2004)
  3. Chomsky, N, "Three Factors in the Language Design", Linguistic Inquiry, 36, pp.1~22 (2005)
  4. Chomsky, N, "On phases Massachusetts Institute of Technology", 석사, pp.2005
  5. Grohmann, "Prolific Domains. On the Anti-Locality of Movement Dependencies" (2003), Benjamins
  6. Horstein, Nunes, Grohamann, "Understanding Minimalism: An Introduction to Minimalist Syntax" (2006), University Press
  7. Huang, C-T. James, "Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar", 석사, pp.1982
  8. Horstein, Nunes, Grohamann, "Understanding Minimalism: An Introduction to Minimalist Syntax" (2006), University Press
  9. Radford, A, "Minimalist Syntax" (2006), Cambridge University Press
  10. Uriagereka, J, "Multiple Spell-out. In Working minimalism", pp.251~282 (1999), MIT Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)