A Clitic Verb Analysis of the Korean Copula -i-
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Among the previous approaches to the analysis of the Korean copula -i-, some assume that it is the stem of a regular verb and some others assume that it is a “syntactic suffix.” The aim of this paper is to show that the copula is neither a syntactic suffix nor a regular verb but a clitic verb. The suffix hypothesis cannot account for its syntactic independence, while the regular verb hypothesis cannot explain its phonological dependence on its host. We will see that the clitic analysis best captures both the syntactic and phonological characteristics of -i-. We will focus more on pointing out problems of the two types of approaches rather than on proposing a new clitic approach.
Abstract
Among the previous approaches to the analysis of the Korean copula -i-, some assume that it is the stem of a regular verb and some others assume that it is a “syntactic suffix.” The aim of this paper is to show that the copula is neither a syntactic suffix nor a regular verb but a clitic verb. The suffix hypothesis cannot account for its syntactic independence, while the regular verb hypothesis cannot explain its phonological dependence on its host. We will see that the clitic analysis best captures both the syntactic and phonological characteristics of -i-. We will focus more on pointing out problems of the two types of approaches rather than on proposing a new clitic approach.
참고문헌 (43)
- Ahn, Hee-Don, "Functional Categories in Korean", Harvard Workshop on Korean Linguistics III (1989)
- An, Myong Chol, "Reconsideration of the Grammatical Character of i", Kwukehak, 25 (1995)
- Bae, Ju-Chae, "Morphonological Description of the Conjugations of ida and anida", Kwukehak, 37 (2001)
- 채희락, "한국어의 소단위어: 동사류 소단위어를 중심으로", 어학연구, 41(3), pp.569~604 (2005), 언어교육원
- 채희락, "접어와 한국어 품사 분류: 품사 재정립 및 띄어쓰기 재고", 언어, 32(4), pp.803~826 (2007), 한국언어학회
- Chae, Hee-Rahk, "Clitics and Related Phenomena in Korean and English", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 13 (2010)
- Chae, Hee-Rahk, "A Survey of Morphological Issues in Korean: Focusing on Syntactically Relevant Phenomena", Korean Linguistics, 9 (1998), International Circle of Korean Linguistics
- Choi, Hyon Pai, "Coseneuy Phwumsa Pwunlyulon", ~ (1930)
- Choi, Ki Yong, "‘ita’uy ‘i’nun Cwukyek Cosaita", Hyengthaylon, 3(1) (2001)
- 최기용, "시정곤(2002) 및 김의수(2002)에서 지적된 몇 가지 의문에 답하여", 형태론, 5(1), pp.111~121 (2003), 형태론
- Choi, Ki Yong, "Hankwukeuy Hayk Itong: Congkyelhyengul Cwungsimulo", Sayngsengmwunpepyenkwu, 3(1) (2003)
- 한정한, "이다의 형태 통사 의미 범주", 국어국문학, 151(151), pp.117~150 (2009), 국어국문학회
- 황화상, "통사적 접사 설정의 제 문제", 한국어학, 28, pp.269~294 (2005), 한국어학회
- Im, Hong Pin, "Thongsacek Phasayngey Tayhaye", Ehakyenku, 25(1) (1989)
- Im, Hong Pin, "Cengchey Palkhimuy Hyengyongsa ‘ita’ Mwunceywa Yene" (2006), Emwunhak Yenkwuuy Nelpiwa Kiphi
- Kim, Ryang Jin, "Clitics and Functional Word: Morphological Unit and Syntactic Unit", Hankwukehak, 38 (2008)
- Kim, Wan Jin, "Hyengthayloncek Hyenanuy Umwunloncek Kukpokul Wihaye", Tongamwunhwa, 11 (1998), Sewultay Tongamwunhwa Yenkwuso
- Ko, Chang Soo, "Ekan Hyengseng Cepmisaey Tayhayye", Hankwuk Ehak Yenkwu, 7 (1985)
- Ko, Chang Soo, "The Syntactic Word Formation in Korean", Kwukehak, 22 (1992)
- Ko, Chang Soo, "ita Kwumwunuy Cacil Yensan", Hanseng Emwunhak, 25 (2005)
- 이건수, "‘이다’가 통사적 접사인가?", 비교문화연구, 12(2), pp.107~140 (2008), 비교문화연구소
- Lee, Seung-Jae, "i-uy Sakceywa Saynglyak", Cwusikyenghakpo, 13 (1994)
- Mok, Jung-soo, "Hankwuke Mwunpeplon" (2003), Tosechwulphan Welin
- Mok, Jung-soo, "Defense of the Support Verb ida in Korean", Emwunyenkwu, 34 (2006)
- Nam, Kil-im, "Hyentay Kwuke ita Kwumwun Yenkwu" (2004), Hankwuk Mwunhwasa
- Navis, J, "Finnish Particle Clitics and General Clitic Theory", 박사, pp.1985
- Nevis, J, "Clitics: A Comprehensive Bibliography" (1994), John Benjamins
- Oh, Mira, "The Korean Copula and Palatalization", Language Research, 27(4) (1991)
- Park, Dong Geun, "Problems of Syntactic Affixation in Korean Language", Korean Language Research, 7 (2000)
- Seo, Jeong Mok, "Keysa Kumwunkwa ku Pwucengmwunuy Thongsa Kwucoey Tayhaye" (1993), Kwukeysa Calyowa Kwukeyhak Yenkwu
- Shi, Chung-Kon, "-i(ta)-uy -i-ka Cepsain Myech Kaci Iyu", Cwusikyeng Hakpo, 11 (1993)
- Shi, Chung-Kon, "Kwukeuy Tanehyengseng Wenli" (1994), Hankwuk Mwunhwasa
- 시정곤, "이다' 구문과 통사적 접사설을 다시 논의함", 한국어학, 28, pp.55~80 (2005), 한국어학회
- Um, Jung Ho, "On the Category Stipulation of ida", Kwukekwukmunhak, 110 (1993)
- Woo, Soon Jo, "Itawa Anitauy Sangkwanseng", Hyengthaylon, 2(1) (2000)
- Woo, Soon Jo, "ita’uy ‘i’ka Cosain Saylowun Cungketul", Hyengthaylon, 3(1) (2001)
- Woo, Soon Jo, "Misconception of Conjugation and the So-called ‘ida’ Construction in Korean: From the Perspective of the Marker Theory", Enehak, 33 (2006)
- Yang, Jeong Seok, "The Meaning and Syntax of ‘I-TA’", Yensey Emwunhak, 19 (1986)
- Yang, Jeong Seok, "Korean Copula ida: Its Category and Meaning", Kwukehak, 37 (2001)
- 양정석, "‘이-’ 주격조사설에 대한 반론", 형태론, 5(1), pp.99~110 (2003), 형태론
- Zwicky, A, "Cliticization vs. Inflection: English n't", Language, 59 (1983)
- Zwicky, A, "On clitics" (1977), Indiana University Linguistics Club
- Zwicky, A, "Ciltics and Particlas", Language, 61 (1985)