Number in (in)definite contexts: The case study of Korean
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper investigates number in the nominal domain with a particular focus on Korean. English is well-known to show singular-plural number contrast unlike Korean that shows number neutral-plural contrast. Recent studies, however, have suggested that Korean has singular-plural number contrast in a certain context, namely definite context. This paper proposes that in Korean singular and plural nominals in definite contexts do not have the same structures as indefinite contexts. In a definite context, a plural nominal has a full DP structure with NumP similar to a singular nominal. In an indefinite context, on the other hand, a plural nominal has a modifying plural unlike a singular nominal with a bare nP. The proposed structures form a basis for the semantic account, i.e., the syntactic-complexity-based competition for number in Katzir (2007) adopted for Western Armenian. Assuming this syntax-based semantic account for Korean, it is shown that the different number contrasts in the two different contexts are natural consequences of the singular-plural competition. The proposed syntactic and semantic accounts for Korean suggest that a language like Korean may have two two-way number contrasts, not one two-way contrast (e.g., as in English) suggested in previous literature. This paper shows that the two two-way number contrasts are not a cross-linguistically rare phenomenon as originally suggested in the literature but possible in various languages such as Blackfoot (Algonquian), Western Armenian, and Mandarin, and so on.
Abstract
This paper investigates number in the nominal domain with a particular focus on Korean. English is well-known to show singular-plural number contrast unlike Korean that shows number neutral-plural contrast. Recent studies, however, have suggested that Korean has singular-plural number contrast in a certain context, namely definite context. This paper proposes that in Korean singular and plural nominals in definite contexts do not have the same structures as indefinite contexts. In a definite context, a plural nominal has a full DP structure with NumP similar to a singular nominal. In an indefinite context, on the other hand, a plural nominal has a modifying plural unlike a singular nominal with a bare nP. The proposed structures form a basis for the semantic account, i.e., the syntactic-complexity-based competition for number in Katzir (2007) adopted for Western Armenian. Assuming this syntax-based semantic account for Korean, it is shown that the different number contrasts in the two different contexts are natural consequences of the singular-plural competition. The proposed syntactic and semantic accounts for Korean suggest that a language like Korean may have two two-way number contrasts, not one two-way contrast (e.g., as in English) suggested in previous literature. This paper shows that the two two-way number contrasts are not a cross-linguistically rare phenomenon as originally suggested in the literature but possible in various languages such as Blackfoot (Algonquian), Western Armenian, and Mandarin, and so on.
참고문헌 (38)
- Bale, Alan, "Syntactic complexity and competition : The singular-plural distinction in Western Armenian", Linguistic Inquiry, 45(1), pp.1~26 (2014)
- Barrie, Michael, "Numeral classifiers in Korean-ki nominalizations", Linguistic Research, 39(3), pp.499~518 (2022)
- Bliss, Heather, "The semantics of the bare noun in Turkish", Calgary Working Paper in Linguistic, 25, pp.1~65 (2004)
- Borer, Hagit, "Structuring sense, volume I : In name only" (2005), Oxford University Press
- Bott, Lewis, "Salient alternatives facilitate implicatures", PLoS ONE, 17(3), pp.e0265781~ (2022)
- Chierchia, Gennaro, "Reference to kinds across languages", Natural Language Semantics, 6, pp.339~405 (1998)
- Chomsky, Noam, "Minimalist inquiries : The framework" (1998), MITWPL
- Corbett, Greville G., "Number" (2000), Cambridge University Press
- Dionne, Danielle, "Complexity vs. salience of alternatives in implicature:A cross-linguistic investigation", Glossa Psycholinguistics, 1(1), pp.1~27 (2022)
- Frantz, Donald G., "Blackfoot grammar" (2009), University of Toronto Press
- Ghomeshi, Jila, "Plural marking, indefiniteness, and the noun phrase", Studia Linguistica, 57(2), pp.47~74 (2003)
- Grice, H. Paul, "Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts", pp.41~58 (1975), Academic Press
- Heim, Irene, "Semantics: An international handbook of contemporary research", pp.487~535 (1991), Mouton de Gruyter
- Horn, Laurence, "On the semantic properties of logical operators in English", PhD, pp.1972
- Jenks, Peter, "Articulated definiteness without articles", Linguistic Inquiry, 49(3), pp.501~536 (2018)
- Kang, Arum, "Marking definiteness in an articleless language : The role of the domain restrictor KU in Korean", Language and Linguistics, 22, pp.301~336 (2021)
- Kang, Beom-Mo, "Plurality and other semantic aspects of common nouns in Korean", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 3(1), pp.1~24 (1994)
- Katzir, Roni, "Structurally-defined alternatives", Linguistics and Philosophy, 30, pp.669~690 (2007)
- Kim, Chonghyuck, "The Korean plural marker-tul and its implications", PhD, pp.2005
- Kim, Kyumin, "On the complementary distribution of plurals and classifiers in East Asian classifier languages", Language and Linguistic Compass, 12(4), pp.e12271~ (2018)
- Kim, Kyumin, "Modifying plurals, classifiers, and co-occurrence : The case of Korean", Glossa : a journal of general linguistics, 3(1), pp.25~ (2018)
- Kim, Kyumin, "2+2 = 3 : Number contrasts in Blackfoot", Glossa : a journal of general linguistics, 2(1), pp.96~ (2017)
- Kim, Min-Joo, "Anaphoric definiteness marking in Korean : Focusing on subject definites", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 32, pp.373~409 (2023)
- Krifka, Manfred, "Semantics and contextual expressions", pp.75~116 (1989), Foris
- Krifka, Manfred, "Bare NPs: Kind-referring, indefinites, both or neither?", Proceedings of the 13th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference (SALT 13), pp.180~203 (2003), CLC Publications
- Kwon, SongNim, "Empirical issues in formal syntax and semantics 5", pp.133~158 (2004), Peter Lang Publishing
- Lee, Chungmin, "Numeral classifiers, (in-)definiteness and incremental theme in Korean", Korean Syntax and Semantics: LSA Institute Workshop, pp.1~23 (2000), Thaehaksa
- Link, Godehard, "Meaning, use, and interpretation of language", pp.302~323 (1983), Mouton De Gruyter
- Ojeda, Armerindo, "The semantics of collectives and distributives in Papago", Natural Language Semantics, 6(3), pp.245~270 (1998)
- Park, So-Young, "The role of human and definite features in Korean pluralization", Studies in Generative Grammar, 32(2), pp.175~196 (2020)
- Park, So-Young, "Two types of plurals and numeral classifiers in classifier languages : The case of Korean", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 31, pp.139~177 (2022)
- Roberts, Craige, "Uniqueness in definite noun phrases", Linguistics and Philosophy, 26, pp.287~350 (2003)
- Sauerland, Uli, "A new semantics for number", Proceedings of the 13th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference (SALT 13), pp.258~275 (2003), CLC Publications
- Schwarz, Florian, "Two types of definites in natural language", PhD, pp.2009
- Schwarzschild, Roger, "Pluralities" (1996), Kluwer
- Singh, Raj, "Maximize presupposition! and local context", Natural Language Semantics, 19, pp.149~168 (2011)
- Spector, Benjamin, "Presuppositions and implicatures in copositional semantics", pp.243~281 (2007), Palgrave Macmillan
- Teghipour, Sara, "Definiteness in Laki : Its interaction with demonstratives and number", Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 66(4), pp.548~575 (2021)