『水滸傳』과 『洪吉童傳』의 비교연구
A Comparison between 'Heroes of the Marshes' and 'The Story of Hong Kildong'
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Exploring the views from character, structure and ideology, the paper gives a comparison between <Heroes of Marshes> and <The Story of Hong Kildong>. From the person’s character, the borning of heroes from Liangshan Lake has been described little negatively, while which of Hong Kildong has been described very positively. The two novels also show difference from the structure. Heroes in the “Marshes” finally goes back to reality after escape out of reality, showing a changing process of from resistance to defection, as well as from the world of personal loyalty to the world of loyalty to emperor. On the other hand, Hong Kildong expands his scope of activities from family to whole country, and finally broadening to overseas, accompanied with continuous rise of his social position. From the view of ideology, “personal loyalty” or “loyalty to emperor” which appeared in <Heroes of Marshes> can not be found in <The Story of Hong Kildong>, what we can see is the spirit of resistance to Chaosun Dynasty. In <Heroes of Marshes>, women is deemed to be a obstacle of being as a hero, reflecting solitude of abandoning family, mentality of revenging on his enemies by all means, which those ideology does not showed in <The Story of Hong Kildong>. According to the analysis mentioned above, we can come to the conclusion that <The Story of Hong Kildong> is not a imitated from <Heroes of Marshes>, and is an original literary work.
Abstract
Exploring the views from character, structure and ideology, the paper gives a comparison between <Heroes of Marshes> and <The Story of Hong Kildong>. From the person’s character, the borning of heroes from Liangshan Lake has been described little negatively, while which of Hong Kildong has been described very positively. The two novels also show difference from the structure. Heroes in the “Marshes” finally goes back to reality after escape out of reality, showing a changing process of from resistance to defection, as well as from the world of personal loyalty to the world of loyalty to emperor. On the other hand, Hong Kildong expands his scope of activities from family to whole country, and finally broadening to overseas, accompanied with continuous rise of his social position. From the view of ideology, “personal loyalty” or “loyalty to emperor” which appeared in <Heroes of Marshes> can not be found in <The Story of Hong Kildong>, what we can see is the spirit of resistance to Chaosun Dynasty. In <Heroes of Marshes>, women is deemed to be a obstacle of being as a hero, reflecting solitude of abandoning family, mentality of revenging on his enemies by all means, which those ideology does not showed in <The Story of Hong Kildong>. According to the analysis mentioned above, we can come to the conclusion that <The Story of Hong Kildong> is not a imitated from <Heroes of Marshes>, and is an original literary work.
참고문헌 (25)
- 김효민, "구조의 특징에 관한 고찰", 中國語文論叢 (1998), 중국어문연구회
- 薩孟武, "水滸傳與中國社會" (1982), 三民書局
- 민관동, "수호전 의 국내수용에 관한 연구" (1998), 한국중국소설확회
- 서대석, "군담소설의 구조와 배경" (1984), 이화여자대학교 출판부
- 서정희, "수호전 의 구조연구", 중국학연구 (1994), 중국학연구회
- 孫術宇, "水滸傳的來歷,心態與藝術" (1983), 時報文化出版事業有限公司
- 申基亨, "韓國小說 發達史" (1960), 彰文社
- 楊? 柳, "論宋江的典型人物像" (1959), 人民文學出版社
- 嚴敦易, "水滸傳的演變"" (1957), 作家出版社
- 李鳳麟, "水滸傳이 洪吉童傳에 미친 영향", 석사, pp.1966
- 李秉岐, "國文學全史" (1972), 新丘文化社
- 李相翊, "洪吉童傳과 水滸傳의 比較硏究", 국어교육, 4 (1962), 한국국어교육연구회
- 이윤석, "홍길동전 연구" (1997), 계명대학교출판사
- 李在秀, "韓國小說硏究" (1969), 宣明文化社
- 李慧淳, "水滸傳 硏究" (1985), 정음사
- 장주옥, "水滸傳과 洪吉童傳의 比較硏究", 香蘭文學, 5 (1975), 성신여대 사범대
- 全圭泰, "洪吉童傳에 미친 水滸傳의 影響 in: 比較文學과 比較文化" (1984), 二友出版社
- 鄭沃根, "水滸傳 在古代朝鮮的傳播和影響", 中國學論叢 (1997), 한국중국문화학회
- 鄭?東, "洪吉童傳硏究" (1961), 文豪社
- 趙寬熙, "水滸傳 에 나타난 “義”와 “忠”의 갈등구조에 대한 연구", 석사, pp.1986
- 조동일, "英雄의 一生,그 文學史的 展開", 東亞文化, 10 (1971), 서울대학교 문리과대학동아문화연구소
- 조동일, "한국문학통사 1(제3판)" (1994), 지식산업사
- 車相轅, "中國文學史" (1958), 東國文化社
- 崔省南, "水滸傳寓意與結構之分析" (1982), 국립대만대학
- 許庚寅, "水滸傳 人物與主題的關係", 논문집 (1996), 단국대학교
