일본에서는 임진왜란을 어떻게 인식하여 왔는가
What have Japanese thought of ImjinWaeran?
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
ImjinWaeran-Japanese invasion by Toyotomi Hideyoshi during Chosun dynasty- has been called in the different names in the three Asian countries like Korea, China and Japan. Especially in Japan it has various names with the times. For example, it had been called <Karairi>, <Chosenseibatsu>, <Choseneki>, <kouraijin>, <Chosenjin>, <Sankanseibatsu>, <Seikan> since pre-modern period. But now they are calling it <Chosenshuppei> or <Bunrok- Keichonoeki> which was named after the era of the then emperor. From the various names for ImjinWaeran we can see that Japanese understanding and evaluation about ImjinWaeran has not been done well yet. This paper is to grasp the Japanese view of the war through examining the change of understanding of ImjinWaeran which was the first overseas war for Japan to conquer the other country. <The conquest of Three kingdoms by empress Jingu> was considered the cause of ImjinWaeran in the literary works like Chosenkungimono. It can not be thought without being premised on an assumption that Chosun had paid tribute to Japan long time ago. Like this the Japanese view of Chosun has been handed down to this day, which originated from the above assumption. In the era of the Meiji Retoration ImjinWaeran was evaluated as one of historical events, which was performed to make Hideyoshi's dream-the great conquest of the continent-come true. Since the normalization of diplomatic relations between Korea and Japan in 1965, new forms of literary works related to ImjinWaeran have appeared to be seen. In the past works we could just see ImjinWaeran as one of the historical events and heroic generals during the war like Kato Kiyomasa. But in modern works we can get to see main characters who were common people or significant and symbolic people under the name of cultural exchanges between Korea and Japan. For example, there are Sayaka (Chosun name was Kim Chungsun), Shim Soogwan, Oda Julia, lots of nameless Japanese people and women of Yangban. Through the lives of these kinds of people it seems that they tried hard to reinterpret the meaning of the war. They show an antiwar idea with their works depicting characters who were leading a tragic life affected by the war. Like this, today, it can be said that Japanese people are seeing ImjinWaeran in a new light again.
Abstract
ImjinWaeran-Japanese invasion by Toyotomi Hideyoshi during Chosun dynasty- has been called in the different names in the three Asian countries like Korea, China and Japan. Especially in Japan it has various names with the times. For example, it had been called <Karairi>, <Chosenseibatsu>, <Choseneki>, <kouraijin>, <Chosenjin>, <Sankanseibatsu>, <Seikan> since pre-modern period. But now they are calling it <Chosenshuppei> or <Bunrok- Keichonoeki> which was named after the era of the then emperor. From the various names for ImjinWaeran we can see that Japanese understanding and evaluation about ImjinWaeran has not been done well yet. This paper is to grasp the Japanese view of the war through examining the change of understanding of ImjinWaeran which was the first overseas war for Japan to conquer the other country. <The conquest of Three kingdoms by empress Jingu> was considered the cause of ImjinWaeran in the literary works like Chosenkungimono. It can not be thought without being premised on an assumption that Chosun had paid tribute to Japan long time ago. Like this the Japanese view of Chosun has been handed down to this day, which originated from the above assumption. In the era of the Meiji Retoration ImjinWaeran was evaluated as one of historical events, which was performed to make Hideyoshi's dream-the great conquest of the continent-come true. Since the normalization of diplomatic relations between Korea and Japan in 1965, new forms of literary works related to ImjinWaeran have appeared to be seen. In the past works we could just see ImjinWaeran as one of the historical events and heroic generals during the war like Kato Kiyomasa. But in modern works we can get to see main characters who were common people or significant and symbolic people under the name of cultural exchanges between Korea and Japan. For example, there are Sayaka (Chosun name was Kim Chungsun), Shim Soogwan, Oda Julia, lots of nameless Japanese people and women of Yangban. Through the lives of these kinds of people it seems that they tried hard to reinterpret the meaning of the war. They show an antiwar idea with their works depicting characters who were leading a tragic life affected by the war. Like this, today, it can be said that Japanese people are seeing ImjinWaeran in a new light again.
참고문헌 (57)
- 芥川?之介, "金?軍』, 芥川?之介全集 , 5", ちくま文庫
- 荒山徹, "魔風海?" (2004), 祥?社文庫
- 荒山徹, "魔岩??" (2006), 祥?社
- 荒山徹, "十兵衛??" (2005), 新潮文庫
- 遠藤周作, "?の首枷" (1977), 中央公論社
- 小田?, "民岩太閤記" (1992), 朝日新聞社
- 姜魏堂, "壺屋の高麗人』,『生きている虜囚" (1966), 新興書房
- 神坂次?, "海の伽琴" (1993), ?間書店
- "?尻 、 日本?筆大成 第3期" (1977), 吉川弘文館
- 司馬遼太?, "故?忘じがたく候 , 文春文庫" (1976), 文藝春秋
- "太平記 、 新潮日本古典文?集成" (1988), 新潮社
- ?口康彦, "朝鮮陣拾遺 , 記? 九州文? 創作扁" (1974), 梓書院
- 近松半二, "山城の?畜生塚 , 近松半二?瑠璃集 ; 叢書江?文庫14、?書刊行?" (1987)
- 津本陽, "夢のまた夢" (1993), 文藝春秋
- 富蘇峰, "豊巨氏時代 朝鮮役』上ㆍ中ㆍ下, 近世日本?民史" (1935), 明治書院
- 友納徹, "?密道中 鬼一法眼忍法帖 ? 朝鮮使節の?" (2001), 文芸社
- 友納徹, "高麗秘帖 ? 李舜臣?軍を暗殺せよ 祥?社文庫" (2003)
- 中島敦, "巡査の居る風景 , 中島敦全集1" (1993), 筑摩書房
- 長谷川つとむ, "?化した侵略兵" (1996), 新人物往?社
- "八幡愚童訓 , 寺社?起 、日本思想大系 第20" (1976), 岩波書店
- 松本愛重, "豊太閤征韓秘? 第一輯" (1894), 成?社
- 宮本??, "王使 , 虎砲記" (1991), 新潮社
- 宮本??, "海虹妃" (2000), 新潮社
- 森?, "佐橋甚五? , 森?外?史文?集" (2000), 岩波書店
- 森?子, "三彩の女" (1983), 主婦の友社
- 고사카 지로, "바다의 가야금" (2001), 인북스
- 미야모토 도쿠조, "왕사(王使)" (1992), 한국경제신문사
- 오다 마코토, "소설 임진왜란" (1992), 웅진출판
- 하세가와 쓰토무, "귀화한 침략병" (1996), 현대문학
- ?柳綱太?, "豊太閤朝鮮役" (1929), 京城新聞社
- 荒野泰典, "近世日本と東アジア" (1989), 東京大?出版
- 李元植他, "朝鮮通信使と日本人" (1992), ?生社
- 石原道博, "文祿ㆍ慶長の役" (1963), ?書房
- 磯貝治良, "?後日本文?のなかの朝鮮韓?" (1992), 大和書房
- 小和田哲男, "豊臣秀吉" (1985), 中公新書
- 上垣外憲一, "空?なる出兵" (1989), ?武書店
- 北島万次, "豊臣政?の?外認識と朝鮮侵略" (1990), 倉書房
- 北島万次, "豊臣秀吉の朝鮮侵略" (1996), 吉川弘文館
- 北島万次, "壬辰倭?と秀吉ㆍ島津ㆍ李舜臣" (2002), 校倉書房
- 琴秉洞, "耳塚" (1978), 二月社
- 桑田忠親, "太閤記の?究" (1965), ?間書店
- ?井義之, "朝鮮?究文?誌-明治ㆍ大正編" (1979), ??書?
- 參謀本部, "日本?史 朝鮮役" (1924), 偕行社
- 張玉祥, "織豊政?と東アジア" (1989), 六興出版
- 津田左右吉, "文?に現われたる我が?民思想の?究(四)" (1977), 岩波書店
- ?富猪一?, "朝鮮役" (1935), 明治書院
- 中村?孝, "日鮮?係史の?究 , 中ㆍ下" (1970), 吉川弘文館
- 貫井正之, "秀吉が勝てなかった朝鮮武" (1992), 同時代社
- 藤居信雄, "李舜臣?書" (1982), 古川書房
- 松田毅一, "秀吉と文祿の役" (1964), 中公新書
- 松田毅一, "南?太閤記" (1991), 朝日文庫
- 三宅英利, "近世アジアの日本と朝鮮半島" (1993), 朝日新聞社
- 山室恭子, "?金太閤" (1992), 中公新書
- "文祿ㆍ慶長の役(壬辰ㆍ丁酉倭? )" (1994), 講談社
- "일본과 임진왜란" (2003), 고려대출판부
- 최관, "아쿠타가와 류노스케(芥川?之介)와 「임진록」", 비교문학, 30(30), pp.73~88 (2003), 한국비교문학회
- 최 관, "임진왜란 관련 일본문학의 전개양상에 대한 연구― 조선군기물의 전개양상을 중심으로 ―", 일본학보, 61(61), pp.681~694 (2004), 한국일본학회
