본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

How to make container control measures using radio frequency identification consistent with WTO jurisprudence

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

초록

Radio frequency identification (RFID) provides a useful tool for the prescreening or detection of goods and containers moving across the border and for controlling the trade of illicit materials and preventing or mitigating the effects of terrorism. Although anti- terrorism measures are important in today’s dangerous world, RFID tools, if misused, may violate the WTO trade rules. Whenever goods or container control measures using RFID are proposed, their contents, objectives, and rationale must be published, and WTO members must be notified through the WTO Secretariat and allowed to make comments. WTO members should not take such measures that are designed or applied in a discriminatory manner and those measures must be adopted only under necessary situations and to the extent necessary. These measures must reduce the incidence and complexity of import and export formalities, and there should not be substantial penalties for minor breaches of the requirements under the measures. If the measures require country-of-origin information in RFID tags, they must apply in the same way to like products, and they must not cause unnecessary inconveniences or unreasonable cost. If the measures deal with containers in international transit, they must be reasonable, consider the conditions of the traffic, and guarantee transit through the most convenient routes for international transit. A container control measure designed to restrict the flow of fissionable materials or their derivative materials, traffic in arms, ammunition, and implements of war, or traffic in military supply goods and materials may be justified, even if it violates some of the GATT rules. In addition, a measure established in time of war or other emergency in international relations or based on the United Nations Charter and designed to maintain international peace and security can also be justified. As a last resort, WTO members may request a waiver from GATT and TBT Agreement obligations for container control measures that include RFID. Superpowers must be careful not to use RFID to practice power politics and create regulations to deal with national security and anti-terrorism issues that do not conform to international law. The key question is how to maintain a balance between the two inalienable values of free trade and national security in this era of globalization, harmonization, and terrorism.

Abstract

Radio frequency identification (RFID) provides a useful tool for the prescreening or detection of goods and containers moving across the border and for controlling the trade of illicit materials and preventing or mitigating the effects of terrorism. Although anti- terrorism measures are important in today’s dangerous world, RFID tools, if misused, may violate the WTO trade rules. Whenever goods or container control measures using RFID are proposed, their contents, objectives, and rationale must be published, and WTO members must be notified through the WTO Secretariat and allowed to make comments. WTO members should not take such measures that are designed or applied in a discriminatory manner and those measures must be adopted only under necessary situations and to the extent necessary. These measures must reduce the incidence and complexity of import and export formalities, and there should not be substantial penalties for minor breaches of the requirements under the measures. If the measures require country-of-origin information in RFID tags, they must apply in the same way to like products, and they must not cause unnecessary inconveniences or unreasonable cost. If the measures deal with containers in international transit, they must be reasonable, consider the conditions of the traffic, and guarantee transit through the most convenient routes for international transit. A container control measure designed to restrict the flow of fissionable materials or their derivative materials, traffic in arms, ammunition, and implements of war, or traffic in military supply goods and materials may be justified, even if it violates some of the GATT rules. In addition, a measure established in time of war or other emergency in international relations or based on the United Nations Charter and designed to maintain international peace and security can also be justified. As a last resort, WTO members may request a waiver from GATT and TBT Agreement obligations for container control measures that include RFID. Superpowers must be careful not to use RFID to practice power politics and create regulations to deal with national security and anti-terrorism issues that do not conform to international law. The key question is how to maintain a balance between the two inalienable values of free trade and national security in this era of globalization, harmonization, and terrorism.

참고문헌 (13)

  1. OECD, "Container Transport Security Across Modes" (2005), OECD Publications Service
  2. IBM, "Beyond the Bar Code. in: Transforming Business with Radio Frequency Identification" (2004), IBM Global Services
  3. Cybersecurity of Freight Information Systems, "National Research Council of the National Academies Transportation", ~, pp.Research Board Special Report 274 (2003)
  4. David C. Wyld, "RFID. in: The Right Frequency for Government" (2005), IBM Center for the Business of Government
  5. "Resolution 1535. 2004. adopted by the Security Council at its 4936th meeting on 26 March 2004", ~ (2004)
  6. "Resolution 1540. 2004. adopted by the Security Council at its 4956th meeting on 28 April 2004", ~ (2004)
  7. "Resolution 1566. 2004. adopted by the Security Council at its 5053th meeting on 8 October 2004", ~ (2004)
  8. "Agreement Establishing the WTO, signed in Marrakech, Morocco, on April 15, 1994, 33 ILM 1144. 19", ~ (1994)
  9. "The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade as amended and in force on January 1, 1994, 55 U.N.T.S. 187; B.I.S.D. Vol. IV", ~ (1994)
  10. Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade, "Annex 1A, Agreement of Establishing the World Trade Organization"
  11. "Understanding in Respect of Waivers of Obligations under the GATT 1994", ~ (1994)
  12. 61 and C, "Reduction of Customs Duties on Certain Citrus Fruit originating from Israel and Spain (17S", pp.EEC, M
  13. 179 and C, "Preferential Tariff Quotas to the USSR (18S", pp.Greece, M

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)