본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Estimating socio-economic impact from ship emissions at the Port of Incheon

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Ports create harmful effects on their adjacent population because ships discharge noxious gases like SOX, NOX, and particulate matter (PM). To tackle this problem, some ports started to control emission through regulations such as Emission Control Areas (ECA) and Reduced Speed Zone (RSZ). This paper estimates the social cost of ship emission and eco-efficiency at the Port of Incheon (POI). We further examine how the ECA and RSZ designation can reduce the social cost. The estimation is based on the activity-based approach, where ship type, engine, and movement are used to measure fuel consumption and then emission. Results suggest that the social cost of ship emission at the POI amounts to $90,805,478. The eco-efficiency of the POI, compared to the one at the Port of Las Palmas in another study, is substantially better. Under RSZ, the corresponding emission abatement values are $4,485,308, $2,642,009 and $21,932,435 from SO2, NOX and PM reduction, respectively. If 1.0% and 0.1% sulfur fuel are used complying with rules of the ECA, the social cost savings amount to $8,174,947 and $12,868,842 from SO2 reduction.

Abstract

Ports create harmful effects on their adjacent population because ships discharge noxious gases like SOX, NOX, and particulate matter (PM). To tackle this problem, some ports started to control emission through regulations such as Emission Control Areas (ECA) and Reduced Speed Zone (RSZ). This paper estimates the social cost of ship emission and eco-efficiency at the Port of Incheon (POI). We further examine how the ECA and RSZ designation can reduce the social cost. The estimation is based on the activity-based approach, where ship type, engine, and movement are used to measure fuel consumption and then emission. Results suggest that the social cost of ship emission at the POI amounts to $90,805,478. The eco-efficiency of the POI, compared to the one at the Port of Las Palmas in another study, is substantially better. Under RSZ, the corresponding emission abatement values are $4,485,308, $2,642,009 and $21,932,435 from SO2, NOX and PM reduction, respectively. If 1.0% and 0.1% sulfur fuel are used complying with rules of the ECA, the social cost savings amount to $8,174,947 and $12,868,842 from SO2 reduction.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. Baseline scenarios for the clean air for Europe (CAFE) programme, "Amann, M.", ~, pp.Final report 79 (2005)
  2. Bae, M. J., "Container transshipment and port competition", Maritime Policy & Management, 40, pp.479~494 (2013)
  3. Berechman, J., "Estimating the environmental costs of port related emissions : the case of Kaohsiung", Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 17, pp.35~38 (2012)
  4. Blonigen, B. A., "The growth and patterns of international trade", Maritime Policy & Management, 40, pp.618~635 (2013)
  5. Chang, Y. T., "Assessing noxious gases of vessel operations in a potential Emission Control Area", Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 28, pp.91~97 (2014)
  6. Chang, Y. T., "Economic impact of port sectors on South African economy : An input–output analysis", Transport Policy, 35, pp.333~340 (2014)
  7. Chang, Y. T., "Assessing greenhouse gas emissions from port vessel operations at the Port of Incheon", Transportation Research Part D : Transport and Environment, 25, pp.1~4 (2013)
  8. Chang, C. C., "Evaluating the effects of green port policy : Case study of Kaohsiung harbor in Taiwan", Transportation Research Part D : Transport and Environment, 17, pp.185~189 (2012)
  9. Dragović, B, "Ship emissions and their externalities in cruise ports", Research Part D: Transport and Environment (2015)[DOI]
  10. Geerlings, H., "A new method for assessing CO2-emissions from container terminals : a promising approach applied in Rotterdam", Journal of Cleaner Production, 19, pp.657~666 (2011)
  11. Effectiveness of international emission control measures for North Sea shipping on Dutch air quality, "Hammingh, P.", ~, pp.MNP Report, 500092004 (2007)
  12. "Methodology for the cost-benefit analysis for CAFE: volume 1: overview of methodology" (2005)[URL]
  13. Hummels, D., "Transportation costs and international trade in the second era of globalization", The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21, pp.131~154 (2007)
  14. 민정웅, "An estimation of gas emissions in Korea’s air transport industry", Journal of International Logistics and Trade, 8(2), pp.117~140 (2010), 정석물류통상연구원
  15. Lee, P. T. W., "External costs of domestic container transportation: Short‐sea shipping versus trucking in Taiwan", Transport Reviews, 30, pp.315~335 (2010)
  16. Liao, C. H., "The impact of an emerging port on the carbon dioxide emissions of inland container transport: An empirical study of Taipei port", Energy Policy, 38, pp.5251~5257 (2010)
  17. McArthur, D. P., "Ships in a city harbour : An economic valuation of atmospheric emissions", Transportation Research Part D : Transport and Environment, 21, pp.47~52 (2013)
  18. Maragkogianni, A., "Evaluating the social cost of cruise ships air emissions in major ports of Greece", Transportation Research Part D : Transport and Environment, 36, pp.10~17 (2015)
  19. 박민영, "Emissions impacts of a modal shift: a case study of the Southern California ports region", Journal of International Logistics and Trade, 5(2), pp.67~81 (2007), 정석물류통상연구원
  20. "Description of updated and extended draft tools for the detailed site-dependent assessment of external costs, EcoSense Web V1. 3" (2008)[URL]
  21. Song, S., "Ship emissions inventory, social cost and eco-efficiency in Shanghai Yangshan port", Atmospheric Environment, 82, pp.288~297 (2014)
  22. Tian, L., "Shipping emissions associated with increased cardiovascular hospitalizations", Atmospheric Environment, 74, pp.320~325 (2013)
  23. Tichavska, M., "Environmental cost and eco-efficiency from vessel emissions in Las Palmas Port", Transportation Research Part E : Logistics and Transportation Review, 83, pp.126~140 (2015)
  24. Tzannatos, E., "Ship emissions and their externalities for Greece", Atmospheric Environment, 44, pp.2194~2202 (2010)
  25. Tzannatos, E., "Ship emissions and their externalities for the port of Piraeus–Greece", Atmospheric Environment, 44, pp.400~407 (2010)
  26. Wang, C., "The costs and benefits of reducing SO2 emissions from ships in the US West Coastal waters", Transportation Research Part D : Transport and Environment, 12, pp.577~588 (2007)
  27. Watanabe, Y., "Evaluation of carbon dioxide emissions from container ports", Journal of International Logistics and Trade, 2, pp.85~93 (2004)
  28. Yap, W. Y., "Competition dynamics between container ports in East Asia", Transportation Research Part A : Policy and Practice, 40, pp.35~51 (2006)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)