본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Out of Sample Validity of Random Response Share Approach: Food Choice Experiment

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

There is a growing interest in exploring attribute non-attendance (ANA) in choice experiments. This study applied Random Response Share (RRS) approach for investigating inattention choice in choice experiments and assessed its out-of-sample predictive performance using 60 months of choice experiment data from 61,592 U.S households. Our results suggest that the RRS is not likely to be a dominant strategy to the conventional multinomial logit model in terms of the out-of-sample forecasting accuracy. However, the RRS could be a way to deal with attribute nonattendance when also considering the socio-economic characteristics of respondents.

Abstract

There is a growing interest in exploring attribute non-attendance (ANA) in choice experiments. This study applied Random Response Share (RRS) approach for investigating inattention choice in choice experiments and assessed its out-of-sample predictive performance using 60 months of choice experiment data from 61,592 U.S households. Our results suggest that the RRS is not likely to be a dominant strategy to the conventional multinomial logit model in terms of the out-of-sample forecasting accuracy. However, the RRS could be a way to deal with attribute nonattendance when also considering the socio-economic characteristics of respondents.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. Alemu MH, "Attending to the reasons for attribute non-attendance in choice experiments", Environmental and Resource Economics, 54(3), pp.333~359 (2013)
  2. Greene WH, "A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: Contrasts with mixed logit", Transportation Research Part B, 37(8), pp.681~698 (2003)
  3. Hensher DA, "Non-attendance and dual processing of common-metric attributes in choice analysis:A latent class specification", Empirical Economics, 39(2), pp.413~426 (2010)
  4. Hensher DA, "The implications on willingness to pay of respondents ignoring specific attributes", Transportation, 32(3), pp.203~222 (2005)
  5. Hensher DA, "Applied choice analysis" (2015), Cambridge University Press
  6. Hole AR, "Inferred vs. stated attribute non-attendance in choice experiments:A study of doctors’ prescription behaviour", J. of Economic Behavior and Organization, 96, pp.21~31 (2013)
  7. Hole AR, "A discrete choice model with endogenous attribute attendance", Economics Letters, 110(3), pp.203~205 (2011)
  8. Izrael D, "To rake or not to rake is not the question anymore with the enhanced raking macro", The 29th Annual SAS Users Group International Conference Paper, pp.1~11 (2004)
  9. Kragt ME, "Stated and inferred attribute attendance models:A comparison with environmental choice experiments", J. of Agricultural Economics, 64(3), pp.719~736 (2013)
  10. Lusk JL, "Food demand survey (FooDS) technical information on survey questions and methods", pp.2013
  11. Lusk JL, "Consumer research with big data: Applications from the food demand survey (FooDS)", American J. of Agricultural Economics, 99(2), pp.303~320 (2017)
  12. Malone T, "A simple diagnostic measure of inattention bias in discrete choice models", European Review of Agricultural Economics, 45(3), pp.455~462 (2018)
  13. McFadden D, "Frontiers in econometrics", pp.105~142 (1974), University of California at Berkeley
  14. McKendree MGS, "Animal welfare perceptions of the U.S. public and cow-calf producers", J. of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 50(4), pp.544~578 (2018)
  15. Scarpa R, "Modelling attribute non-attendance in choice experiments for rural landscape valuation", European Review of Agricultural Economics, 36(2), pp.151~174 (2009)
  16. Scarpa R, "Inferred and stated attribute non-attendance in food choice experiments", American J. of Agricultural Economics, 95(1), pp.165~180 (2013)
  17. Tonsor GT, "Producer decision making under uncertainty:Role of past experiences and question framing", American J. of Agricultural Economics, 100(4), pp.1120~1135 (2018)
  18. Train KE, "Discrete choice methods with simulation" (2009), Cambridge University Press
  19. Van Loo EJ, "Sustainability labels on coffee:Consumer preferences, willingness-to-pay and visual attention to attributes", Ecological Economics, 118, pp.215~225 (2015)
  20. Van Loo EJ, "Using eye tracking to account for attribute non-attendance in choice experiments", European Review of Agricultural Economics, 45(3), pp.333~365 (2018)
  21. Weller P, "Stated and inferred attribute non-attendance in a design of designs approach", J. of Choice Modelling, 11(1), pp.43~56 (2014)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)