Global Business and Financial Cycles: A Tale of Two Capital Account Regimes
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Using a new equity price-based measure of the global financial cycle, this paper evaluates the relative importance of global financial shocks for quarterly equity returns and output growths in a large sample of advanced and emerging economies, as well as in South Korea and China–two countries on different sides of the trilemma triangle of international finance. We document that global financial shocks in both China and South Korea explain a substantial share of equity return variability (20 and 50 percent of total variance, respectively), but a much smaller portion of real output fluctuations (less than 10 percent in Korea and negligible in the case of China). We also find that the combination of a closer capital account and a more rigid exchange rate regime, as in China, is associated with some costs in terms of diversification opportunities quantified by very large exposures to domestic financial and real shocks, dwarfing the contribution of any other shock in the model. More surprisingly, the combination of a relatively open capital account and a flexible exchange rate, as in South Korea, not only is associated with a higher exposure to the global financial cycle than in China but also with a significant incidence of domestic financial shocks on output fluctuations.
Abstract
Using a new equity price-based measure of the global financial cycle, this paper evaluates the relative importance of global financial shocks for quarterly equity returns and output growths in a large sample of advanced and emerging economies, as well as in South Korea and China–two countries on different sides of the trilemma triangle of international finance. We document that global financial shocks in both China and South Korea explain a substantial share of equity return variability (20 and 50 percent of total variance, respectively), but a much smaller portion of real output fluctuations (less than 10 percent in Korea and negligible in the case of China). We also find that the combination of a closer capital account and a more rigid exchange rate regime, as in China, is associated with some costs in terms of diversification opportunities quantified by very large exposures to domestic financial and real shocks, dwarfing the contribution of any other shock in the model. More surprisingly, the combination of a relatively open capital account and a flexible exchange rate, as in South Korea, not only is associated with a higher exposure to the global financial cycle than in China but also with a significant incidence of domestic financial shocks on output fluctuations.
참고문헌 (29)
- Bai, J., "Determining the Number of Factors in Approximate Factor Models", Econometrica, 70, pp.191~221 (2002)
- Bai, Y, "World financial cycles", 2019 Meeting Papers 1545, Society for Economic Dynamics (2019)
- Bailey, N, "A multiple testing approach to the regularisation of large sample correlation matrices", Journal of Econometrics, 208, pp.507~534 (2019)
- How Important is the Global Financial Cycle? Evidence from Capital Flows, "Cerutti, E", National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, ~, pp.NBER Working Papers 23699 (2017)
- Cesa-Bianchi, A., "Global liquidity, house prices, and the macroeconomy: Evidence from advanced and emerging economies", Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 47, pp.301~335 (2015)
- Cesa-Bianchi, A., "International credit supply shocks", Journal of International Economics, 112, pp.219~237 (2018)
- Cesa-Bianchi, A., "Uncertainty and Economic Ac- tivity: A Multicountry Perspective", The Review of Financial Studies, 33, pp.3393~3445 (2019)
- Arbitrage, Factor Structure, and Mean-Variance Analysis on Large Asset Markets, "Chamberlain, G.", Harvard University Department of Economics, ~, pp.Scholarly Articles 3230355 (1982)
- Chudik, A., "Weak and strong crosssection dependence and estimation of large panels", Econometrics Journal, 14, pp.C45~C90 (2011)
- Colacito, R., "Risks for the Long Run and the Real Exchange Rate", Journal of Political Economy, 119, pp.153~181 (2011)
- Engel, C, "Macroprudential Policy under High Capital Mobility: Policy Implications from an Academic Perspective", Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 42, pp.162~172 (2016)
- Erten, B, "Capital Controls: Theory and Evidence", Journal of Economic Literature
- Gourinchas, P.-O., "Monetary Policy and Global Spillovers:Mechanisms, Effects and Policy Measures, vol. 25", pp.279~324 (2018), Central Bank of Chile
- Global Macro-Financial Cycles and Spillovers, "Ha, J", National Bureau of Economic Research, ~, pp.Working Paper 26798 (2020)
- Han, X., "International Transmissions of Monetary Shocks: Between a Trilemma and a Dilemma", Journal of International Economics, 110, pp.205~219 (2018)
- Huo, Z, "Technology and Non-Technology Shocks: Measurement and Implications for International Comovement", ~ (2015)
- Kapetanios, G, "Detection of units with pervasive effects in large panel data models", Journal of Econometrics
- Lewis, K. K., "Evaluating international consumption risk sharing gains: An asset return view", Journal of Monetary Economics, 71, pp.84~98 (2015)
- Lucas, Robert E, J., "Asset Prices in an Exchange Economy", onometrica, 46, pp.1429~1445 (1978)
- Ma, C, "The Effect of the China Connect", ~ (2019)
- Miranda-Agrippino, S, "U.S. Monetary Policy and the Global Financial Cycle", The Review of Economic Studies (2020)
- Pesaran, H. H., "Generalized impulse response analysis in linear multivariate models", Economics Letters, 58, pp.17~29 (1998)
- Pesaran, M. H, "Time Series and Panel Data Econometrics" (2015), Oxford University Press
- Rebucci, A, "Capital Controls: A Survey of the New Literature", ~ (2020)
- Rey, H, "Dilemma not trilemma: the global cycle and monetary policy independence", Proceedings - Economic Policy Symposium (2013)
- Ross, S. A, "The arbitrage theory of capital asset pricing", Journal of Economic Theory, 13, pp.341~360 (1976)
- Sentana, E, "Did the EMS Reduce the Cost of Capital?", Economic Journal, 112, pp.786~809 (2002)
- Tesar, L. L, "Evaluating the gains from international risk sharing", Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 42, pp.95~143 (1995)
- Zeev, N. B, "Capital Controls as Shock Absorbers", Journal of International Economics, 109, pp.43~67 (2017)