체계적, 종합적 음철법에 기반해 개발된 유아 파닉스 프로그램의 효과성 연구
A Study on the Effectiveness of the Systematic Synthetic Phonics Program for Children
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 논문은 체계적, 종합적 음철법에 기반해 한 민간 어린이집에서 개발한 파닉스 프로그램을 5세 유아들에게 적용한 후 프로그램의 효과성을 알아본 연구이다. 효과성을 검증하기 위하여 유아들의 음운 및 음소 인식, 철자 인식, 어휘 인식, 조음 능력 및 정의적 영역의 사전, 사후 변화를 분석하였다. 구체적으로 각운 대응 과업 검사, 두음 대응 과업 검사, 두음 발화 검사, 철자 인식 검사, 철자 이름 말하기 검사, 철자 음가 말하기 검사, 어휘 인식 검사, 어휘 발화 검사, 조음 능력 검사, 정의적 영역 검사를 실시하여 사전과 사후 평균 점수를 비교하였고, 수업 관찰도 병행하였다. 분석 결과, 종합적 음철법에 기반해 개발한 체계적 파닉스 프로그램이 유아들의 음운 및 음소 인식, 철자 인식, 어휘 인식에 전체적으로 긍정적인 효과를 미치는 것으로 분석되었다. 하지만, 유아들이 음소를 조합하여 단어를 발화하는 응용 능력을 키울 수 있는 프로그램의 보완이 필요한 것으로 나타났다. 정의적 영역에서는 사전, 사후에 큰 차이가 없었지만, 전반적으로 유아들의 흥미도가 높은 것으로 나타났다.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of the systematic synthetic phonics program developed at a private nursery. We analyzed the impact of the phonics program on 5-year-olds’ phonological and phonemic awareness, phoneme pronunciation, awareness, naming, and reading of the English alphabet, word awareness and reading, articulation, and affective characteristics. The results confirmed the positive effectiveness of the phonics program that had been developed over the past four years. First, it was found that the phonics program had a positive impact on the awareness and pronunciation of phonemes of children. It was also confirmed that it had a positive impact on word awareness and reading, as well as alphabet awareness and reading. There was a significant improvement in the children’s articulation ability. Regarding the affective domain, it was discovered that numerous children already exhibited a high level of interest and satisfaction in the phonics program. Observing the children’s active participation in the phonics program confirmed that the songs, chants, and media presented in the program provided children with positive motivation. To maximize the efficacy of this phonics program, the following recommendations are provided. The first step is to introduce a task that encourages children to produce words by blending phonemes or letters. Second, children must be exposed to authentic English pronunciation through media in order to reduce the influence of their native language. Thirdly, the phonics program should be modified to encourage more active participation from children.
참고문헌 (31)
- 남예리, "영어 학습자의 초기읽기능력 진단을 위한한국형 DIBELS-Next 벤치마크 개발", 석사, pp.2016
- 류현정, "초기 영어읽기능력 평가 도구 K-DIBELS 문항 개발", 석사, 초등영어교육전공, pp.2012
- 마송희, "유아의 음운인식능력과 읽기능력에 관한 연구: 모국어와 영어를 중심으로", 한국교육문제연구, 31(4), pp.183~206 (2013), 한국교육문제연구소
- 마송희, "음운인식과 연계한 유아영어 파닉스 프로그램의 개발 및 효과", 한국교육문제연구, 37(4), pp.191~218 (2019), 한국교육문제연구소[DOI]
- 문미정, "2015 개정 교육과정에 따른 초등 3~4학년 영어 교과서 파닉스 분석", 교사교육연구, 58(4), pp.471~482 (2019), 과학교육연구소[DOI]
- 박수정, "Phonics 지도법 활용이 영어 학습부진 학생의 어휘학습과 읽기능력 및 정의적 요인에 미치는 영향", 석사, pp.2017
- 박수정, "파닉스 지도가 초등학교 영어 학습부진 학생의 초기 리터러시 발달에 미치는 영향", 초등영어교육, 23(4), pp.171~191 (2017), 한국초등영어교육학회[DOI]
- 이은식, "Phonics지도가 초등학생들의 영어 읽기 능력향상에 미치는 영향: 사례연구", 초등영어교육, 18(2), pp.323~350 (2012), 한국초등영어교육학회[DOI]
- 장지은, "통합적 파닉스 프로그램이 초등학생의 초기읽기 해독능력에 미치는 효과", 영어영문학, 25(1), pp.313~337 (2020), 미래영어영문학회[DOI]
- 정현성, "어린이집 유아의 영어 음운 인식 발달 종단 연구", 말소리와 음성과학, 10(4), pp.53~66 (2018), 한국음성학회[DOI]
- 2022 개정 영어과교육과정시안 검토 공청회, "한국교육과정평가원", ~, pp.연구자료 ORM 2022-108 (2022)
- Bowers, J. S., "Reconsidering the evidence that systematic phonics is more effective than alternative methods of reading instruction", Educational Psychology Review, 32, pp.681~705 (2020)[DOI]
- Bowers, J. S., "Yes children need to learn their GPCs but there really is little or no evidence that systematic or explicit phonics is effective : a response to Fletcher, Savage, and Sharon(2020)", Educational Psychology Review, 33, pp.1965~1979 (2021)[DOI]
- L. BRADLEY, "Difficulties in auditory organisation as a possible cause of reading backwardness", Nature, 271(5647), pp.746~747 (1978), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Bryant, P. E., "Rhyme and alliteration, phoneme detection, and learning to read", Developmental Psychology, 26, pp.429~438 (1990)[DOI]
- Jennifer Buckingham, "Systematic phonics instruction belongs in evidence-based reading programs: A response to Bowers", The Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 37(2), pp.105~113 (2020), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- Stacey Campbell, "Teaching phonics without teaching phonics: Early childhood teachers’ reported beliefs and practices", Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 20(4), pp.783~814 (2018), SAGE Publications[DOI]
- Catherine A. Darnell, "Decoding the phonics screening check", British Educational Research Journal, 43(3), pp.505~527 (2017), Wiley[DOI]
- Stanley L. Deno, "Formative Evaluation of Individual Student Programs: A New Role for School Psychologists", School Psychology Review, 15(3), pp.358~374 (1986), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- Fiona J. Duff, "Validity and sensitivity of the phonics screening check: implications for practice", Journal of Research in Reading, 38(2), pp.109~123 (2014), Wiley[DOI]
- Jack M. Fletcher, "A Commentary on Bowers (2020) and the Role of Phonics Instruction in Reading", Educational Psychology Review, 33(3), pp.1249~1274 (2020), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Goswani, U., "Phonological skills and learning to read" (2016), Routledge
- Philip B. Gough, "Decoding, Reading, and Reading Disability", Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), pp.6~10 (1986), SAGE Publications[DOI]
- Hans U. Grundin, "Policy and evidence: a critical analysis of the Year 1 Phonics Screening Check in England", Literacy, 52(1), pp.39~46 (2017), Wiley[DOI]
- Teaching children to read:An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction, "National Reading Panel.", National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, ~ (2000)
- O’Grady, W., "How children learn language" (2005), Cambridge University Press
- "R: A language and environment for statistical computing version 4.2.1" (2022)[URL]
- Rose, J., "Independent review of the teaching of early reading" (2006), DfES Publications
- Teaching reading: Report and recommendations, National inquiry into the teaching of literacy, "Rowe, K.", Department of Education, Science and Training, Australian Council for Educational Research, ~ (2005)
- "8th edition of Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS®): Administration and scoring guide, 2021 edition" (2021)[URL]
- "DIBELS®: Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills" (2021)[URL]