본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

해양유류오염 손해보상- 허베이 스피리트호 사건과 관련하여 -

Compensation System for Sea Oil Pollution - In Relation with Hebei Spirit Vessel Case -

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

As the year, 2008, the Korean constitution law celebrates its 60th Compensation System for Sea Oil Pollution - In Relation with Hebei Spirit Vessel Case Sea oil pollution is especially problematic in a way that area infected is wide, it results in mass damage and takes a long time to recover. Moreover, due to increase in size of oiler, damage is more critical for ocean ecosystem. 'Hebei Spirit Case', collision between SamSung Heavy Industry derrick and Cantonese vessel 'Hebei Spirit', occurred in December of 2007 in Taean,Chungcheongnam-do, and is known as the biggest sea oil pollution accident in Korea. Therefore, this case can be the test case for our ability to response. Currently, we are only registered to 1992 CLC convention and 1992 FC agreement, and not to 2003 Protocol. Reason being is that it is more advantageous for Korea not to sign the protocol in comparison with contribution we have to pay and accident occurrence probability. Korea shares maritime transport route with Japan and China, and the usage of this route is becoming more frequent since East Asia area is being rapidly developed. Also it can be seen as man-made disaster. It is because SamSung derrick decided to sail despite the forecast, and the warning from maritime control center and coast guard was given to inform them that there is a high risk of collision. On top of that, shipper, Hyundai Oil, used single-hull structure when there was an international agreement to use double-hull structure. There is a high possibility that there would have been no oil pollution if it was double-hull structure vessel considering the hole size made in Hebei Spirit Vessel Case, Taking these several factors into consideration, registering to 2003 convention will bring company's consciousness to danger, and will increase the liability of the shippers (Oil companies such as Hyundai Oil Bank). Therefore, we need to register to international convention which increased the limit for compensation (Protocol of 2003 to the International Convention on the Establishment of an International Fund for Compensation for Oil Pollution Damage), as soon as possible. Furthermore, in no relations with these hypotheses, there was a news that Samsung Heavy Industry will contribute 100 000 000 000 won of company's property to Taean. This can be shown as a repression to company's activity. It is enough to make company liable by law, and making them liable for something by public opinion which legal liability does not exist, is just driving our company away to overseas. On the other hand, it is a custom of international convention not to compensate for ecosystem by oil pollution. But rather relying on that, we need to try actively to recover our environment for a country which is surrounded by still water. Thus we need to establish a domestic law for environment recovery separately from international convention.

Abstract

As the year, 2008, the Korean constitution law celebrates its 60th Compensation System for Sea Oil Pollution - In Relation with Hebei Spirit Vessel Case Sea oil pollution is especially problematic in a way that area infected is wide, it results in mass damage and takes a long time to recover. Moreover, due to increase in size of oiler, damage is more critical for ocean ecosystem. 'Hebei Spirit Case', collision between SamSung Heavy Industry derrick and Cantonese vessel 'Hebei Spirit', occurred in December of 2007 in Taean,Chungcheongnam-do, and is known as the biggest sea oil pollution accident in Korea. Therefore, this case can be the test case for our ability to response. Currently, we are only registered to 1992 CLC convention and 1992 FC agreement, and not to 2003 Protocol. Reason being is that it is more advantageous for Korea not to sign the protocol in comparison with contribution we have to pay and accident occurrence probability. Korea shares maritime transport route with Japan and China, and the usage of this route is becoming more frequent since East Asia area is being rapidly developed. Also it can be seen as man-made disaster. It is because SamSung derrick decided to sail despite the forecast, and the warning from maritime control center and coast guard was given to inform them that there is a high risk of collision. On top of that, shipper, Hyundai Oil, used single-hull structure when there was an international agreement to use double-hull structure. There is a high possibility that there would have been no oil pollution if it was double-hull structure vessel considering the hole size made in Hebei Spirit Vessel Case, Taking these several factors into consideration, registering to 2003 convention will bring company's consciousness to danger, and will increase the liability of the shippers (Oil companies such as Hyundai Oil Bank). Therefore, we need to register to international convention which increased the limit for compensation (Protocol of 2003 to the International Convention on the Establishment of an International Fund for Compensation for Oil Pollution Damage), as soon as possible. Furthermore, in no relations with these hypotheses, there was a news that Samsung Heavy Industry will contribute 100 000 000 000 won of company's property to Taean. This can be shown as a repression to company's activity. It is enough to make company liable by law, and making them liable for something by public opinion which legal liability does not exist, is just driving our company away to overseas. On the other hand, it is a custom of international convention not to compensate for ecosystem by oil pollution. But rather relying on that, we need to try actively to recover our environment for a country which is surrounded by still water. Thus we need to establish a domestic law for environment recovery separately from international convention.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. 김봉철, "외국법제동향-영국 기름유출 등 선박오염에 관한 법규제정 동향", 최신외국법제정보 (2008), 한국법제연구원
  2. 김인현, "국제유류오염손해보상기금(IOPC FUND) 뭉스 야콥슨 사무총장의 강연", 월간 해양한국, (1) (2007), 한국해사문제연구소
  3. 김종윤, "해상유류오염 손해배상의 범위", 한국해법학회지 (1998), 한국해법학회
  4. 本田健吉, "동북아 해양오염 해결을 위한 국제협력", 환경과 생명, 통권 : 5 (1985)
  5. 목진용, "2003 보충기금협약 가입 및 유류오염손해 보상체제 개편논의에 대한 대응방안" (2005)
  6. 목진용, "국제유류오염손해 보상체제의 개편 동향 in 해양수산" (2004)
  7. 배병태, "1969년 유류오염에 대한 민사책임에 관한 국제조약의 연구2 in 해양한국" (1974)
  8. 서동희, "유류오염손해배상보장제도와 그 최근 동향", 한국해법학회 2008 봄철정기학술발표회 (2008), 한국해법학회
  9. 서헌제, "유류오염손해배상보장법안의 해설", 한국해법학회지, 14(1) (1992), 한국해법학회
  10. 최재선, "해양수산 현안분석 -유류오염 보상제도 개선방안-" (2004)
  11. 최종현, "미국 1990년 기름오염법과 우리 법의 개정 방향", 한국해법학회지 (1991), 한국해법학회
  12. 최종현, "선박에 의한 오염손해의 전보에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2001
  13. 한국해양연구원 해양시스템안전연구소(강창구), "씨프린스호 유류오염사고 사후관리방안 연구" (2002)
  14. 환경운동연합, "허베이 스피리트호 기름유출사고-서해로 가는 아름다운 행렬, 2008.3", ~ (2008)
  15. IOPC Fund, "1992 Fund Assembly (10th Session), 2005.10", ~ (2005)
  16. Mans Jacobsson, "The International Liability and Compensation Regime for Oil Pollution from Ships-International Solutions for a Global Problem", Tulane Maritime Law Journal, (Winter) (2007)
  17. UNEP, "The State of the Marine Environment", GESAMP report and studies, (39) (1990)
  18. Z. Oya Ozcayir, "Liability for Oil Pollution and Collisions" (1998)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)