본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

자본시장통합법과 미국법상 적합성 원칙

Suitability Rules for Capital Market and Financial Investment Services Act and Investor Protection Measures

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Abstract

Capital Market and Financial Investment Business Act differentiates between normal investors and professional investors. In another words, financial investors have to define the purpose, current financial standing, previous investment experiences and such, before suggesting the investment. Also they have to maintain and control the information by receiving a confirmation through signature, recording or any other methods whichever Presidential decree regulates as a method, and provide the details to the investors immediately. (Article 46, Clause 2). The reason for differentiating the regulations between normal investors from financial investors is to protect the investors. Therefore the act induces the financialinvestors to recommend to normal investors which are suitable for their case, based on the purpose, current financial standing and previous investment experiences(Article 46, Clause 3). Such principle was established in relations with stock exchange in U.S., and it states that one should not recommendan investment which is not suitable for the investors based on several factors. It does not exist as a written form in United States, but it is elected as one of the principles of NASD(National Association of Securities Dealers), FINRA(Financial Industry Regulatory Authority), and SRO (Self-Regulatory Organizations) of stock market. Suitability rule previously existed as one of the content of article on supervision of stock business, but now is stipulated into one of the clause of Capital Market and Financial Investment Business.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. 김건식, "증권거래법(제4판)" (2006), 두성사
  2. 김건식, "미국증권법" (1996), 홍문사
  3. 김건식, "미국의 증권규제" (2001), 홍문사
  4. 김병연, "미국 연방증권법상 부실공시에 대한 민사책임과 예측정보에 대한 면책조항", 연세법학연구, 8(2) (2002)
  5. 김병연, "미국 판례법상 시장사기이론과 증권거래법상 손해배상책임에 있어서 인과관계의 문제", 비교사법, 11(1)통권 : 24
  6. 신용진, "證券投資者保護論의 再構成", 기업법연구, 21(3), pp.383~420 (2007), 한국기업법학회
  7. 양석완, "판례로 본 증권투자권유에 따른 적합성원칙", 기업법연구, 12, pp.299~330 (2003), 한국기업법학회
  8. 오성근, "증권투자권유에 관한 법적 규제와 책임" (2004), 법원사
  9. 윤승한, "증권거래법 강의" (2005), 삼일인포마인
  10. 임재연, "증권규제법 in 미국 증권규제제도 연구 및 한국증권거래법 비교해설" (1995), 박영사
  11. 전욱, "자본시장과 금융투자업에 관한 법률상의 금융투자자보호제도에 관한 고찰", 저스티스, (107), pp.193~222 (2008), 한국법학원
  12. 정순섭, "자본시장통합법의 구조와 내용 in 새로운 금융법 체제의 모색(BFL 총서2)" (2006)
  13. 하삼주, "내부자거래규제의 범위에 관한 미국판례법 연구", 성균관법학, 19(2), pp.487~500 (2007), 법학연구소
  14. 황현영, "자본시장과 금융투자에 관한 법률상의 투자자보호에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2007
  15. Bradley J. Bondi, "Securities Arbitrations Involving Mortgage-Backed Securities and Collateralized Mortgage Obligations in SUITABLE FOR UNSUITABILITY", FDMJCFL, 251(14) (2009)
  16. Ian Ayres, "Internalizing Outsider Trading", Mich. L. Rev., 313(101) (2002)
  17. Jerry W. Markham, "Protecting the Institutional Investor-Jungle Predator or Shorn Lamb?", Yale J. On Reg., (42) (1995)
  18. Thomas Lee Hazen, "The Law of Securities Regulation, 5th Edition" (2005), Thomson West

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)