미국법상 내부자거래에 관한 규제 법리와 자본시장법
Insider Trading Regulations Under the U.S. Laws and the Financial Investment Services & Capital Market Act
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
The Information on the stocks in the capital market is very important to the investors who are going to invest their money to those stocks since they make their investment decisions under the information that they could get from the capital market. However, if the information is unequally given to the investors, what is going to happen to the capital market? Suppose that some investors have very important information on some stocks and some investors do not have it. Then the investors who do not have the information may not believe the market's credibility and stability anymore. Once the market lose its confidence the market will be easily collapsed. So, every country has their own regulations on such impartial possessions of information on such stocks in the capital market. The insider trading regulation is the main legal aspect. The legal theory of insider trading regulations has been improved through the cases in the United States for long time and the Securities Exchange Commission enacted Rule 10b5-1 and Rule 10b5-2 in order to complete the legal theory of the insider trading regulation in 2000 with the perspective of the Misappropriation Theory. Actually the Korean Securities Exchange Act did not prescribed such insider trading regulation when it was enacted in 1962. However, when it was revised in 1976, the insider trading regulation was provided and the last amendment was made in 1997. But the Korean Securities and Exchange Act was abolished since the Financial Investment Services and Capital Market Act(FSCMA) is in effect in 2009. The FSCMA regulates the insider trading. This Article analyzes the U.S. cases that built and complete the legal theories of insider trading regulation and examines the provisions of insider trading under the Korean Securities Exchange Act. The Article also reviews the insider trading regulations under the FSCMA and suggests some improvement of the insider trading regulations in Korean capital market.
참고문헌 (33)
- 김건식, "증권거래법" (2000), 두성사
- 김병태, "關係會社와 關聯된 內部者去來規定 適用上의 問題點", 증권법연구, 3(2), pp.215~276 (2002), 한국증권법학회
- 손성, "내부자거래 규제에 관한 연구 ― 자본시장통합법을 중심으로 ―", 상사법연구, 27(2), pp.231~292 (2008), 한국상사법학회
- 이기수, "증권거래법" (2000), 세창출판사
- 조인호, "내부자거래 규제여부에 관한 입법정책상의 고찰", 상장협, (40) (1999), 한국상장회사협의회
- 최선근, "내부자거래의 실효성 제고방안", 상장협, (25) (1992), 한국상장회사협의회
- 하삼주, "내부자거래규제에 관한 비교법적 고찰", 성균관법학, 16(3), pp.369~392 (2004), 법학연구소
- Alan R. Palmiter, "Securities regulation" (1998), Aspen Law & Business
- Cox, Hillman, "Securities Regulation" (1997), Aspen Law & Business
- "H.R. Rep", No. 73-1383, ~ (1934)
- "Insider Trading and Securities Fraud Enforcement Act of 1988", Pub. L. No. 100- 704, 102 Stat. 4677, ~ (1988)
- "NASD Rules 4310(c)(16), 4320(e)(14), and IM- 4120-1", Disclosure of Material Information, ~
- "NYSE Listed Company Manual, para. 202.05", Timely Disclosure of Material News Developments, ~
- O"kelley, Thompson, "Corporations and Other Business Associations" (1999), Aspen Law & Business
- "Regulation FD", 17 C.F.R. §243.100 and §243.101, ~
- "S. Rep", No. 73-792, ~ (1934)
- Scheple, "It's not Just Right : The Ethics of Insider Trading", Law & Contemp, 56 (1993)
- "SEC Release Nos. 33-7787, 34-42259, IC-24209 Proposed Rule: Selective Disclosure and Insider Trading", 1189 PLI, 2000[DOI]
- SEC, "Release No. 33-7881, 34-43154, IC-24599", ~ (2000), Aug. 15
- "Trading Sanctions Act of 1984", Pub. L. No. 98-376, 98 Stat. 1264, ~
- "Cady, Roberts & Co", 40 S.E.C. 907, ~ (1961)
- "Chiarella v. United States", 445 U.S. 222, ~ (1980)
- "Dirks v. SEC", 463 U.S. 646, ~ (1983)
- "Elkind v. Liggett & Myers, Inc", 635 F. 2d 156, ~ (1980), 2d Cir
- "SEC v. Adler", 137 F. 3d 1325, ~ (1998), 11th Cir
- "SEC v. Bausch & Lomb, Inc", 565 F. 2d 8, ~ (1977), 2d Cir
- "SEC v. Materia", cert. denied, 745 F. 2d 197, 471 U.S. 1053, ~ (1984), 2d Cir
- "SEC v. Texas Gulf Sulphur", 401 F. 2d 833 , cert. denied, 394 U.S. 976, ~ (1968), 2d Cir
- "United States v. Carpenter", 791 F. 2d 1024, aff'd 484 U.S. 19, ~ (1986), 2d Cir
- "United States v. Newman", 664 F. 2d 12 , aff'd after remand, 722 F. 2d 729, cert. denied, 464 U.S. 863, ~ (1981), 2d. Cir
- "United States v. O'Hagan", 117 S. Ct. 2199, 521 U.S. 642, ~ (1997)
- "United States v. Smith", 155 F. 3d 1051, cert. denied, 119 S. Ct. 804, ~ (1998), 9th Cir
- "United States v. Teicher", 987 F. 2d 112, cert. denied, 519 U.S. 976, ~ (1993), 2d Cir
