Anchoring Effect of the Prosecutor’s Demand on Sentence: Evidence from Korean Sexual Crime Cases
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The anchoring effect can be found when a decision shows cognitive prejudice towards the initial information given. Several studies have argued that such an effect is present even for judges in the courtroom. This paper seeks to find a relationship between judges’ decisions on penalty sentences and the sentences recommended by prosecutors. In this study, 2,773 actual court cases are considered in the analysis, and quantile regression is used to show that the sentencing decisions judges make are anchored by the recommendations of prosecutors. However, this reliance on recommendations differs according to the seriousness of the crime committed. Specifically, at the lowest penalty levels, a one-month increase in the prosecutors’ sentencing recommendation results in a 0.25-month increase in the judges’ sentence, while at the highest sentence level, the judges’ sentences increase by 0.78 months under an identical condition. The results of this research indicate the need to create more objective and clear sentencing guidelines in the future in an effort to mitigate the psychological pressure experienced by judges with regard to serious offences or heinous crimes.
Abstract
The anchoring effect can be found when a decision shows cognitive prejudice towards the initial information given. Several studies have argued that such an effect is present even for judges in the courtroom. This paper seeks to find a relationship between judges’ decisions on penalty sentences and the sentences recommended by prosecutors. In this study, 2,773 actual court cases are considered in the analysis, and quantile regression is used to show that the sentencing decisions judges make are anchored by the recommendations of prosecutors. However, this reliance on recommendations differs according to the seriousness of the crime committed. Specifically, at the lowest penalty levels, a one-month increase in the prosecutors’ sentencing recommendation results in a 0.25-month increase in the judges’ sentence, while at the highest sentence level, the judges’ sentences increase by 0.78 months under an identical condition. The results of this research indicate the need to create more objective and clear sentencing guidelines in the future in an effort to mitigate the psychological pressure experienced by judges with regard to serious offences or heinous crimes.
참고문헌 (15)
- Hastie, R., "Juror Judgments in Civil Cases: Effects of Plaintiff’s Requests and Plaintiff's Identity on Punitive Damage Awards", Law and Human Behavior, 23(4) (1999)
- Hinsz, V. B., "Assimilation to Anchors for Damage Awards in a Mock Civil Trial", Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(11) (1995)
- 김청택, "법정의사결정에서의 판사들의 인지편향", 서울대학교 법학, 51(4), pp.317~345 (2010), 법학연구소
- Sentence Variation and Influence of Prosecutor’s Demand, "Kim, Jungwook", Supreme Prosecutors’ Office, ~ (2011)
- Koenker, R., "Regression Quantiles", Econometrica, 46(1) (1978)
- 이민식, "살인범들의 양형에 영향을 미치는 요인", 형사정책연구, 17(4), pp.183~218 (2006), 한국형사정책연구원
- 이민식, "연령과 살인범의 양형편차: 비선형 효과의 검토", 형사정책, 21(1), pp.215~240 (2009), 한국형사정책학회
- Study on Improvement of the Current Sentencing Standards and Analysis of Its Current Status: Based on the Statistical Analysis, "Lee, Min-sik", Supreme Prosecutor’s Office, ~ (2010)
- Lee, Young-rahn, "Empirical Study of the Factors Influencing on the Sentence Disposition", The Korean Association of Criminology, 3 (1988)
- Malouff, J, "Shaping Juror Attitudes: Effects of Requesting Different Damage Amounts in Personal Injury Trials", The Journal of Social Psychology, 129(4) (1989)
- Martin, Eugenio Garrido, "Advances in Psychology and Law: International Contributions" (1997), Walter de Gruyter
- 박광배, "가상적인 재판 쟁점에서의 현역판사의 판단과 모의배심의 집단판단에 대한 인지적 방략의 효과", 한국심리학회지: 문화 및 사회문제, 11(1), pp.59~84 (2005), 한국문화및사회문제심리학회
- Robbennolt, J., "Anchoring in the Courtroom: The Effects of Caps on Punitive Damages", Law and Human Behavior, 23(3) (1999)
- Sentence Variation and Influence of Prosecutor’s Demand, "Supreme Prosecutors’ Office", ~ (2011)
- Viscusi, W. K., "The Challenge of Punitive Damages Mathematics", The Journal of Legal Studies, 30 (2001)