치위생과 학생의 치근단 촬영법 인식에 관한 조사 연구
A survey study on recognition of periapical radiography in dental hygiene students
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives : This study was carried out in order to obtain basic data for students' efficient acquirement and instruction of radiography technology in the future by surveying dental hygiene students' recognition of periapical radiography. Methods : This study carried out a questionnaire survey targeting dental hygiene students from December 2009 to December 2010, and obtained the following results. Results : 1. As a result of examining recognition on periapical radiography, the bisecting angle technique was indicated to be averagely 3.84±0.566 points. The paralleling technique was indicated to be 2.66±0.701 points. 2. As a result of examining about problems given the bisecting angle technique, what had been most difficult given the bisecting angle technique was indicated to be the highest in cone positioning with 34.2%. The most difficulty given deciding on the X-ray vertical-angel irradiation direction was indicated to be the highest with 66.9% in adjusting the cone direction on the virtual bisector. 3. As a result of examining about problems given the paralleling technique, what had been most difficult in the process of the paralleling technique was indicated to be the highest with 56.7% in fixing the film immobilization device inside the mouth. Conclusions : Examining the above results, it is considered that there is a need of understanding morphological and anatomical structure inside the mouth in order to reduce the mistake rate given the periapical radiography, and that it is important to increase skill level by repetitively shooting several times with having enough time.
Abstract
Objectives : This study was carried out in order to obtain basic data for students' efficient acquirement and instruction of radiography technology in the future by surveying dental hygiene students' recognition of periapical radiography. Methods : This study carried out a questionnaire survey targeting dental hygiene students from December 2009 to December 2010, and obtained the following results. Results : 1. As a result of examining recognition on periapical radiography, the bisecting angle technique was indicated to be averagely 3.84±0.566 points. The paralleling technique was indicated to be 2.66±0.701 points. 2. As a result of examining about problems given the bisecting angle technique, what had been most difficult given the bisecting angle technique was indicated to be the highest in cone positioning with 34.2%. The most difficulty given deciding on the X-ray vertical-angel irradiation direction was indicated to be the highest with 66.9% in adjusting the cone direction on the virtual bisector. 3. As a result of examining about problems given the paralleling technique, what had been most difficult in the process of the paralleling technique was indicated to be the highest with 56.7% in fixing the film immobilization device inside the mouth. Conclusions : Examining the above results, it is considered that there is a need of understanding morphological and anatomical structure inside the mouth in order to reduce the mistake rate given the periapical radiography, and that it is important to increase skill level by repetitively shooting several times with having enough time.
참고문헌 (16)
- 김희경, "일부 치과위생사의 방사선 질관리에 관한 지식, 태도 및 행위", 대한구강보건학회지, 34(2), pp.273~281 (2010), 대한구강보건학회
- Park CS, "Oral imaging. Version 1", pp.165~ (2009), Gomunsa
- 이경희, "등각촬영법과 평행촬영법에서의 실책 비교 연구", 치위생과학회지, 11(3), pp.155~161 (2011), 한국치위생과학회
- Lee YA, "Comparison of the rate of error with the bisecting angle technique and the paralleling technique", J Dent Hyg Sci, 4(3), pp.97~102 (2004)
- Shin DM, "Statute book of health and medical treatment", pp.53~ (2003), Hakmunsa
- Park YD, "Medical laws relation. Version 8", pp.253~254 (2009), DaehanNarae publishing
- Kang EJ, "A study on the environmental condition and safety in dental radiographic room", J Dent Hyg Sci, 5(2), pp.83~88 (2005)
- Crandell CE, "Cause and frequency of intraoral X-ray errors by dental hygiene student", J Dent Educ, 22(1), pp.189~196 (1971)
- Jang GW, "Analysis on practice of dental radiology in dental hygiene students", Research bulletin of Chinju junior college of nursing & health, 25(2), pp.1~9 (2004)
- Choi KS, "Technical errors in complete mouth radiographic surveys according to radiographic techniques and film holding methods", Imaging Science in Dentistry, 16(1), pp.103~112 (1986)
- 안금선, "구강방사선 실습내용에 관한 분석", 한국치위생학회지, 11(5), pp.783~790 (2011), 한국치위생학회
- 조병주, "창업교육: 교육과정전개와 효과적 교수방법", Korea Business Review, 2(2), pp.27~48 (1998), 한국경영학회
- Association of Korean professors of oral and maxillofacial radiology, "Clinical prectice of oral and maxillofacial radiology. 2nd ed.", pp.5~7 (2002), Narae Publishing, Inc
- 최영숙, "치과위생사의 방사선 촬영업무의 확대에 대한 문헌적 고찰", 한국치위생학회지, 9(2), pp.111~124 (2009), 한국치위생학회
- Van Aken J, "Optimum conditions for intraoral roentgenograms", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 27, pp.475~491 (1969)
- Manson-Hing LR, "What's the angle?, a study of the angle bisected in intraoral radiography", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 49(1), pp.86~89 (1980)