본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

치과위생사의 방사선 촬영업무의 확대에 대한 문헌적 고찰

A literature review on expansion of dental hygienists radiography operations

0

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

This study analyzes through the review of literature and laws the exposure time, clinical frequency, and radiation exposure of intraoral and extraoral radiography as well as of panoramic radiography performed by dental hygienists in dental clinics, compares the dental radiology curriculums of radiological science and dental hygiene departments, and proposes the expansion of dental hygienists' radiography operations. The radiology curriculums were compared between the radiological science and dental hygiene departments of colleges. For new analysis by radiography for dental diagnosis, the exposure time, radiation absorbed dose, effective dose, and number of days of natural radiation were compared by the type of oral radiation films and radiographical techniques proposed by domestic and international studies. The exposure time of panoramic radiography is 15 seconds and it takes about two minutes for completion, whereas the exposure time of the standard radiography is 0.2 ~ 0.8 seconds and it takes 10 times longer for completion of the radiography of full mouth than the panoramic radiography. The standard radiography can cause distortions of radiation at severely curved parts of dental arch and palatopharyngeal reflex. However, panoramic radiography can be performed even for lock jaw patients, causes less inconvenience to patients and is much simpler than the standard radiography. The percentage of dental clinics where radiography is performed by dental hygienists was 92.0%, and the percentage of standard film radiography by dental hygienists was 98% whereas the percentage of panoramic radiography by dental hygienists was 92%. For the absorbed dose which is an indicator of radiation exposure, the When the effective dose which is an indicator of the danger of radiation exposure was converted to the number of days of natural radiation, it was 3.3 days for panoramic radiography, but 13.9 days for the full mouth standard radiography by bisecting angle technique which was 4.2 times longer than the panoramic radiography. There were two colleges that had a dental radiology course with two credits in the departments of radiological science. The credits for dental radiology courses in the department of dental hygiene ranged varied by college, ranging from 3 to 8; on average, the theory course was 2.2 credits and the practice course was 2.02 credits. To summarize the above results, the percentage of dental clinics where panoramic radiography is performed by dental hygienists under the guidance of dentists is high. Panoramic radiography has become an essential facility for dental clinics. It is faster than standard film radiography and less dangerous due to low radiation exposure. Panoramic radiography is a simple mechanical job that does not require training of oral radiography by radiotechnologist. Because panoramic radiography is one of major operations which must be performed at all times in dental clinics, it must be designated as intraoral technique rather than extraoral technique, or legalized for inclusion in the scope of operations of dental hygienists.

Abstract

This study analyzes through the review of literature and laws the exposure time, clinical frequency, and radiation exposure of intraoral and extraoral radiography as well as of panoramic radiography performed by dental hygienists in dental clinics, compares the dental radiology curriculums of radiological science and dental hygiene departments, and proposes the expansion of dental hygienists' radiography operations. The radiology curriculums were compared between the radiological science and dental hygiene departments of colleges. For new analysis by radiography for dental diagnosis, the exposure time, radiation absorbed dose, effective dose, and number of days of natural radiation were compared by the type of oral radiation films and radiographical techniques proposed by domestic and international studies. The exposure time of panoramic radiography is 15 seconds and it takes about two minutes for completion, whereas the exposure time of the standard radiography is 0.2 ~ 0.8 seconds and it takes 10 times longer for completion of the radiography of full mouth than the panoramic radiography. The standard radiography can cause distortions of radiation at severely curved parts of dental arch and palatopharyngeal reflex. However, panoramic radiography can be performed even for lock jaw patients, causes less inconvenience to patients and is much simpler than the standard radiography. The percentage of dental clinics where radiography is performed by dental hygienists was 92.0%, and the percentage of standard film radiography by dental hygienists was 98% whereas the percentage of panoramic radiography by dental hygienists was 92%. For the absorbed dose which is an indicator of radiation exposure, the When the effective dose which is an indicator of the danger of radiation exposure was converted to the number of days of natural radiation, it was 3.3 days for panoramic radiography, but 13.9 days for the full mouth standard radiography by bisecting angle technique which was 4.2 times longer than the panoramic radiography. There were two colleges that had a dental radiology course with two credits in the departments of radiological science. The credits for dental radiology courses in the department of dental hygiene ranged varied by college, ranging from 3 to 8; on average, the theory course was 2.2 credits and the practice course was 2.02 credits. To summarize the above results, the percentage of dental clinics where panoramic radiography is performed by dental hygienists under the guidance of dentists is high. Panoramic radiography has become an essential facility for dental clinics. It is faster than standard film radiography and less dangerous due to low radiation exposure. Panoramic radiography is a simple mechanical job that does not require training of oral radiography by radiotechnologist. Because panoramic radiography is one of major operations which must be performed at all times in dental clinics, it must be designated as intraoral technique rather than extraoral technique, or legalized for inclusion in the scope of operations of dental hygienists.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. 이선엽, "의료기관 진단용 방사선 발생장치의 안전관리 실태와 인식도에 영향을 미치는 요인", 석사, pp.1997
  2. 김창호, "방사선사의 직무만족에 관련된 요인 분석", 대한방사선기술학회지, 20(1), pp.77~83 (1997)
  3. 이경희, "치과위생사의 방사선 안전관리에 대한 조사연구", 석사, pp.2004
  4. 박창서, "구강방사선학 1판", pp.1~12 (1997), 고문사
  5. 신선정, "치과위생사인력추계와업무범위에관한고찰", 치위생과학회지, 7(1), pp.25~30 (2007), 한국치위생과학회
  6. 박용덕, "의료관계법규 7판", pp.175~176 (2008), 대한나래출판사
  7. 강재경, "구강진단용 방사선 이용실태 및 안전 관리에 관한 연구", 치과연구, 30(4) (1991)
  8. 연세대학교 치과대학 구강과학연구소, "구강방사선학 2판", pp.248~263 (2003), 고문사
  9. 대한 구강악안면 방사선교수협의회, "구강 악안면 방사선학 3판", pp.70~79 (2002), 대한나래출판사
  10. 유봉헌, "치과위생학개론 1판", pp.3~19 (2007), 연세대학교출판부
  11. 김은희, "치과위생사와 간호조무사의 업무실태 연구", 석사, pp.2004
  12. 치과위생사의 업무확장에 관한 연구, "박정란", 대한치과위생사협회, ~ (2004)
  13. Bristow RG, "Thyroid dose distribution in dental radiography", Oral Surg oral Med Oral Pathol, 68, pp.487~ (1989)
  14. White SC, "Absorbed bone marrow dose in certain dental ographic techniques", JADA, 98, pp.558~ (1979)
  15. 조명숙, "치과위생사의 구강진단용 방사선 촬영업무 실태 분석", 수원여자대학 논문집, 25, pp.127~142 (1999)
  16. 류정숙, "치과방사선 안전관리 실태에 관한 조사연구", 치과연구, 49(1), pp.39~49 (2001)
  17. 최순철, "전악치근단방사선사진촬영, 파노라마방사선사진촬영 및 협각단층촬영시의 흡수선량", 대한구강악안면방사선학회지, 29(1), pp.255~260 (1999)
  18. Tammisalo T, "A comparison of detailed zonography with periapical radiography for the detection of perapical lesions", Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 24, pp.114~120 (1995)
  19. Tammisalo T, "Radiographic detectability of periodontal diseases. A comparison of periapical radiography wit detailed zonography", Dentomaxillofac radiol, 24, pp.185~190 (1995)
  20. 김선주, "치과의료기관 종사자의 방사선 방어에 관한 지식, 태도 및 행위연구", 석사, pp.2003
  21. 조정연, "이동형 구내 방사선 촬영기로 촬영한 치근단 방사선 사진의 흡수선량 및 유효선량 평가", 석사, pp.2006
  22. Underhill TE, "Radiobiolosic risk estimation from dental radiology PartⅡ. Cancer incidence and fatality", Oral Surg oral Med Oral Pathol, 66(2), pp.261~267 (1988)
  23. 국립보건원, "방사선표준부 법규집", ~ (1995)
  24. 이재서, "치과방사선 촬영기의 표준선량 변화", 석사, pp.2005
  25. 신민정, "구강검진의 효과 증진을 위한 파노라마 방사선 사진의 필요성에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2008
  26. Phillips JE, "Panoramic radiography", Dent Clin North Am, 12, pp.561~570 (1968)
  27. Pettit GG, "Panoramic radiography", Dent Clin North Am, 15, pp.169~182 (1971)
  28. Kate DA, "The detection of abnormalities in the jaws, A Survey", Br Dent J, 134(4), pp.129~135 (1973)
  29. Packota GV, "Radiographic finding in a group of elderly patients at a canadian dental school", J Can Dent Assoc, 57, pp.407~409 (1991)
  30. Yakoumakis EN, "Image quality assessment and radiation doses in intraoral radiography", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 91(3), pp.362~368 (2001)
  31. 김창호, "방사선사의 직무만족에 관련된 요인분석", 대한방사선기술학회지, 20(1), pp.77~83 (1997)
  32. 복혜정, "치위생과 교과과정에 관한 조사연구", 석사, pp.2006
  33. 최항문, "치아우식증 진단시 임상검사와 파노라마 방사선 사진검사의 탐지능 비교", 대한구강악안면방사선학회지, 29(1), pp.275~282 (1999)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)