국내 표준 임상치위생실무지침의 개발 및 타당성 평가
Development and evaluation of standards for clinical dental hygiene practice
2
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to develop applicable standards for clinical dental hygiene practice in Korea and to evaluate their validity. Methods: Based on the standards for clinical dental hygiene practice developed in the United States and Canada, the standards were adapted to be applicable in Korea. The validity of the standards was evaluated by a self-writing questionnaire among 14 professors and 10 clinicians using a developed tool for evaluating the standards. A focus group interview was additionally conducted for clinicians to increase the validity of the standards. Descriptive statistics and Mann-Whitney test were performed using SPSS 25.0. To analyze the content of the focus group interviews, content analysis was conducted. Results: The standards for clinical dental hygiene practice consisted of five elements of professionalism for dental hygienists and a total of 28 items to perform the five stages of dental hygiene process of care (assessment, diagnosis, planning, implementation, and evaluation) and included conceptual meaning, clinical significance, and application methods with examples for each item. Conclusions: The standards for clinical dental hygiene practice developed in this study could contribute to standardizing dental clinical practices provided by dental hygienists. It is necessary to consistently improve the standards that are highly practical, to prevent oral diseases and maintain oral health of the public, based on the results of this validity evaluation.
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to develop applicable standards for clinical dental hygiene practice in Korea and to evaluate their validity. Methods: Based on the standards for clinical dental hygiene practice developed in the United States and Canada, the standards were adapted to be applicable in Korea. The validity of the standards was evaluated by a self-writing questionnaire among 14 professors and 10 clinicians using a developed tool for evaluating the standards. A focus group interview was additionally conducted for clinicians to increase the validity of the standards. Descriptive statistics and Mann-Whitney test were performed using SPSS 25.0. To analyze the content of the focus group interviews, content analysis was conducted. Results: The standards for clinical dental hygiene practice consisted of five elements of professionalism for dental hygienists and a total of 28 items to perform the five stages of dental hygiene process of care (assessment, diagnosis, planning, implementation, and evaluation) and included conceptual meaning, clinical significance, and application methods with examples for each item. Conclusions: The standards for clinical dental hygiene practice developed in this study could contribute to standardizing dental clinical practices provided by dental hygienists. It is necessary to consistently improve the standards that are highly practical, to prevent oral diseases and maintain oral health of the public, based on the results of this validity evaluation.
참고문헌 (23)
- Issues and challenges of dental auxiliary personnel policy in Korea, "Shin BM", Gunchi Dental Policy Team, 26~34 (2018)
- MacDonald L, "Theory analysis of the dental hygiene human needs conceptual model", Int J Dent Hyg, 15(4), pp.e163~e172 (2017)[DOI]
- American dental hygienists’ association, "Standards for clinical dental hygiene practice", ADHA, 3~15 (2016)
- Canadian Dental Hygienists Association, "Entry-to-practice competencies and standards for Canadian dental hygienists", Canadian Dental Hygienists Association, 3~55 (2010)
- Graham R, "Clinical practice guidelines we can trust", pp.1~28 (2011), National Academies Press
- Kim NS, "Guide to the development of care guidelines", Ministry of Health & Welfare, Korean Academy of Medical Science, 3~10 (2009)
- Coffey RJ, "An introduction to critical paths", Qual Manag Health Care, 14(1), pp.46~55 (2005)[DOI]
- Communication on Dental Accreditation, "Accreditation standards for dental hygiene education program", Commission on Dental Accreditation, 15~29 (2016)
- A study on developmental direction of the dental hygiene discipline in Korea, "Chung WG", Korean Dental Hygienist Association, 57~58 (2009)
- 김영숙, "치과위생사의 업무 실태 및 비중에 관한 연구", 한국치위생학회지, 8(3), pp.161~175 (2008), 한국치위생학회
- Dentist's view on the actual work and legal work of dental hygienists, "Han YK", Korean Dental Hygienists Association, 14~32 (2017)
- Kim SY, "NECA’s handbook for clinical practice guideline developer", National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, 112~162 (2015)
- 구미옥, "국내 근거기반 임상간호실무지침 주제의 우선순위 결정", 임상간호연구, 18(1), pp.39~51 (2012), 병원간호사회[DOI]
- Downe-Wamboldt B., "Content analysis: method, applications, and issues", Health Care Women Int, 13(3), pp.313~321 (1992)[DOI]
- Canadian Dental Hygienists Association, "Dental hygiene: definition, scope, and practice standards", Canadian Dental Hygienists Association, 3~15 (2002)
- National Health Insurance Service. A report on the Korea Health Panel Survey of 2015, "Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs", KIHASA, 193~210 (2015)
- Kitchener M, "Professional projects and institutional change in healthcare : The case of American dentistry", Soc Sci Med, 74(3), pp.372~380 (2012)[DOI]
- Johnson PM, "International profiles of dental hygiene 1987 to 2006: a 21-nation comparative study", Int Dent J, 59(2), pp.63~77 (2009)[DOI]
- 한선영, "치위생과정에 근거를 둔 임상치위생학의 교육 실태", 치위생과학회지, 9(3), pp.271~278 (2009), 한국치위생과학회
- 최용금, "국내 치위생(학)과 임상치위생학 교육과정 운영현황 분석", 치위생과학회지, 17(6), pp.523~532 (2017), 한국치위생과학회[DOI]
- 이주영, "치위생과정(ADPIE)의 임상적용 가능성과 실천방안 모색", 치위생과학회지, 14(4), pp.433~441 (2014), 한국치위생과학회
- 유상희, "강릉시 자활근로사업 참여자 대상 치위생 과정 사례보고", 치위생과학회지, 18(6), pp.327~339 (2018), 한국치위생과학회[DOI]
- 김유린, "치위생과정에 근거한 구강건강관리프로그램 대상자의 치위생계획의 영향요인 분석", 한국치위생학회지, 18(2), pp.227~237 (2018), 한국치위생학회[DOI]