동영상 공유 플랫폼에서 치주질환 구강건강정보의 신뢰도 평가
Reliability evaluation of periodontal disease oral health information on YouTube
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: The study aimed to assess the form, reliability, and quality of information related to periodontal diseases shared on YouTube. Methods: On october 23, 2023, we conducted searches on YouTube using four keywords related to periodontal diseases. The searches retrieved a total of 394 videos from the first five pages for each keyword. Of these, 151 were included in the analysis. Videos were categorized based on the source and usefulness of the information, and their reliability and quality were assessed. Results: Analysis of the information sources revealed that medical websites or TV channels (45.7%) were the most prevalent, whereas commercial websites (2.0%) were the least prevalent. Videos uploaded by physician or hospitals (3.08±0.48) and medical websites or TV channels (3.01±0.94) demonstrated higher reliability. Videos categorized as having good and excellent quality were predominantly from physician or hospital sources (88.2%). Useful information related to periodontal diseases was available in 85.4% of videos, with physician or hospital sources contributing the highest proportion of useful information (52.7%). Conclusions: Videos from physician or hospital sources provide high-quality useful and reliable information. To ensure the provision of more useful and accurate information, the involvement and interest of experts are deemed essential.
Abstract
Objectives: The study aimed to assess the form, reliability, and quality of information related to periodontal diseases shared on YouTube. Methods: On october 23, 2023, we conducted searches on YouTube using four keywords related to periodontal diseases. The searches retrieved a total of 394 videos from the first five pages for each keyword. Of these, 151 were included in the analysis. Videos were categorized based on the source and usefulness of the information, and their reliability and quality were assessed. Results: Analysis of the information sources revealed that medical websites or TV channels (45.7%) were the most prevalent, whereas commercial websites (2.0%) were the least prevalent. Videos uploaded by physician or hospitals (3.08±0.48) and medical websites or TV channels (3.01±0.94) demonstrated higher reliability. Videos categorized as having good and excellent quality were predominantly from physician or hospital sources (88.2%). Useful information related to periodontal diseases was available in 85.4% of videos, with physician or hospital sources contributing the highest proportion of useful information (52.7%). Conclusions: Videos from physician or hospital sources provide high-quality useful and reliable information. To ensure the provision of more useful and accurate information, the involvement and interest of experts are deemed essential.
참고문헌 (19)
- 최은미, "40세 이상의 상대적 악력과 치주질환 관련성 연구 : 고감도 C-반응 단백의 매개효과를 중심으로", 대한보건연구, 49(1), pp.1~10 (2023), 사단법인 대한보건협회[DOI]
- 이주현, "우리나라 성인에서 복합만성질환이 치주질환에 미치는 영향", 농촌의학.지역보건, 43(4), pp.224~233 (2018), 한국농촌의학.지역보건학회
- An Li, "Dietary inflammatory potential is associated with poor periodontal health: A population‐based study", Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 48(7), pp.907~918 (2021), Wiley[DOI]
- 조현재, "중장년기 주요 구강건강 지표", 대한치과의사협회지, 58(1), pp.38~44 (2019), 대한치과의사협회[DOI]
- Elia Gabarron, "Identifying Measures Used for Assessing Quality of YouTube Videos with Patient Health Information: A Review of Current Literature", Interactive Journal of Medical Research, 2(1), pp.e6~ (2013), JMIR Publications Inc.[DOI]
- Kapil Chalil Madathil, "Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic review", Health Informatics Journal, 21(3), pp.173~194 (2014), SAGE Publications[DOI]
- "Falling in love with YouTube in Korea"[URL]
- Brandy Drozd, "Medical YouTube Videos and Methods of Evaluation: Literature Review", JMIR Medical Education, 4(1), pp.e3~ (2018), JMIR Publications Inc.[DOI]
- 김은선, "의료 관련 유튜브 동영상의 효용을 높이기 위한 의학적 평가", 대한소화기학회지, 72(6), pp.275~276 (2018), 대한소화기학회[DOI]
- Chae-Ku Jo, "Utility Evaluation of Information from YouTube on Breastfeeding for Preterm Babies", Neonatal medicine, 26(4), pp.185~190 (2019), 대한신생아학회[DOI]
- Koo Bon San, "Reliability and Quality of Korean YouTube Videos for Education Regarding Gout", Journal of Korean Medical Science, 36(45), pp.1~9 (2021), 대한의학회[DOI]
- Mustafa Erkut Onder, "YouTube as a source of information on gout: a quality analysis", Rheumatology International (2021), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- D. Charnock, "DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices", Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 53(2), pp.105~111 (1999), BMJ[DOI]
- ABHA G. SINGH, "YouTube for Information on Rheumatoid Arthritis — A Wakeup Call?", The Journal of Rheumatology, 39(5), pp.899~903 (2012), The Journal of Rheumatology[DOI]
- K Delli, "Is YouTube useful as a source of information for Sjögren's syndrome?", Oral Diseases, 22(3), pp.196~201 (2016), Wiley[DOI]
- Samy A Azer, "Inflammatory bowel disease: An evaluation of health information on the internet", World Journal of Gastroenterology, 23(9), pp.1676~ (2017), Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.[DOI]
- Mehmet Nuri Erdem, "Evaluating the Accuracy and Quality of the Information in Kyphosis Videos Shared on YouTube", Spine, 43(22), pp.E1334~E1339 (2018), Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)[DOI]
- 허근영, "악성 흑색종에 대한 한국어 유튜브 동영상의 질 평가", 대한피부과학회지, 60(3), pp.143~150 (2022), 대한피부과학회
- 이준영, "발목 염좌 후 보존적 치료에 관한 유튜브 영상 평가 및 시청자 선호도와의 상관 관계 분석", 대한정형외과학회지, 57(4), pp.326~332 (2022), 대한정형외과학회[DOI]