치아우식증 및 영양에 대한 유튜브 동영상의 질 평가
Quality assessment of YouTube videos on dental caries and nutrition
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the content, quality, and reliability of YouTube videos related to dental caries and nutrition. Methods: On October 1, 2024, six keywords associated with dental caries and nutrition were used to search YouTube, yielding 472 videos. After screening, 28 videos were included for analysis. The quality and reliability of these videos were assessed. Results: The analysis of information sources revealed that most videos were created by doctors or hospitals (61.0%), followed by for-profit websites or individual users (21.0%), with the least amount of content coming from medical websites or broadcast channels (18.0%). Reliability scores based on the information source showed that videos from medical websites or broadcast channels had the highest reliability (average score of 4.60), followed by videos from doctors or hospitals (average score of 3.88). Conclusions: Videos produced by medical websites, broadcast channels, doctors, and hospitals tend to provide reliable, high-quality information. Continuous monitoring, collaboration, and input from dental professionals are recommended for future content.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the content, quality, and reliability of YouTube videos related to dental caries and nutrition. Methods: On October 1, 2024, six keywords associated with dental caries and nutrition were used to search YouTube, yielding 472 videos. After screening, 28 videos were included for analysis. The quality and reliability of these videos were assessed. Results: The analysis of information sources revealed that most videos were created by doctors or hospitals (61.0%), followed by for-profit websites or individual users (21.0%), with the least amount of content coming from medical websites or broadcast channels (18.0%). Reliability scores based on the information source showed that videos from medical websites or broadcast channels had the highest reliability (average score of 4.60), followed by videos from doctors or hospitals (average score of 3.88). Conclusions: Videos produced by medical websites, broadcast channels, doctors, and hospitals tend to provide reliable, high-quality information. Continuous monitoring, collaboration, and input from dental professionals are recommended for future content.
참고문헌 (23)
- Touger-Decker R, "Position of the academy of nutrition and dietetics : oral health and nutrition", J Acad Nutr Diet, 113(5), pp.693~701 (2013)[DOI]
- Selwitz RH, "Dental caries", Lancet, 369(9555), pp.51~59 (2007)[DOI]
- "Joint position statement on interdisciplinary collaboration between accredited practising dietitians, nutrition and oral health professionals for oral health and nutrition"[URL]
- Tan SS, "Internet health information seeking and the patient-physician relationship : a systematic review", J Med Internet Res, 19(1), pp.e9~ (2017)[DOI]
- "Top YouTube statistics that matter in 2020"[URL]
- Tolu S, "English-language videos on YouTube as a source of information on self administer subcutaneous anti-tumour necrosis factor agent injections", Rheumatol Int, 38(7), pp.1285~1292 (2018)[DOI]
- Kocyigit BF, "YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19 and rheumatic disease link", Clin Rheumatol, 39(7), pp.2049~2054 (2020)[DOI]
- Haslam K, "YouTube videos as health decision aids for the public : an integrative review", Can J Dent Hyg, 53(1), pp.53~66 (2019)
- Tonsaker T, "Health information on the internet : gold mine or minefield?", Can Fam Physician, 60(5), pp.407~408 (2014)
- "Policy on dietary recommendations for infants, children, and adolescents"[URL]
- Hassona Y, "YouTube as a source of information on mouth(oral)cancer", Oral Dis, 22(3), pp.202~208 (2016)[DOI]
- Madathil KC, "Healthcare information on YouTube : a systematic review", Health Informatics J, 21(3), pp.173~194 (2015)[DOI]
- Azer SA, "Are DISCERN and JAMA suitable instruments for assessing YouTube videos on thyroid cancer? methodological concerns", J Cancer Educ, 35(6), pp.1267~1277 (2020)[DOI]
- Page MJ, "The PRISMA 2020 statement : an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews", BMJ, 372, pp.n71~ (2021)[DOI]
- "KDA news"[URL]
- Jo CK, "Utility evaluation of information from YouTube on breastfeeding for preterm babies", Neonatal Med, 26(4), pp.185~190 (2019)[DOI]
- Koo BS, "Reliability and quality of Korean YouTube videos for education regarding gout", J Korean Med Sci, 36(45), pp.e303~ (2021)[DOI]
- Singh AG, "YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis-a wakeup call?", J Rheumatol, 39(5), pp.899~903 (2012)[DOI]
- Bernard A, "A systematic review of patient inflammatory bowel disease information resources on the world wide web", Am J Gastroenterol, 102(9), pp.2070~2077 (2007)[DOI]
- Suneja ES, "An overview of caries risk assessment : Rationale. risk indicators : risk assessment methods and risk-based caries management protocols", Indian J Dent Sci, 9(3), pp.210~214 (2017)[DOI]
- Long M, "YouTube Videos on nutrition and dental caries : content analysis", JMIR Infodemiology, 3, pp.e40003~ (2023)[DOI]
- Bora K, "Are internet videos useful sources of information during global public health emergencies? a case study of YouTube videos during the 2015-16 zika virus pandemic", Pathog Glob Health, 112(6), pp.320~328 (2018)[DOI]
- Rachmawati YL, "Analysis of quality, usefulness, reliability, visibility, and popularity of videos about dental caries on YouTube : a cross-sectional analysis", J Int Soc Prev Community Dent, 12(2), pp.245~251 (2022)[DOI]