본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

사법적 관점에서 본 불공정 거래 행위

Unfair Trade Practices From a Private Law Perspective

0

조회

0

다운로드

27

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This article examines how to understand the substantive provision of unfair trade practices under the Korean competition law and how to establish criteria for its interpretation and assessment. The discussion here starts with a understanding that a legal relationship with which competition law works basically premises a legal relationship between private persons and that competition law has developed by establishing substantive requirements to be applied to private law relationships based on the objectives extending from the perspective of co-ordination of interests to that of trade and market order. This understanding leads to the affirmative valuation for the role of judges as experts in enforcing private laws and producing case laws in the competition law field to the effect of revitalizing discussions on competition law from a private law perspective. This article is divided into 4 sections. Following this introduction, Part II explains that the objective clause of the Korean competition law functions as a principle to interpret and apply the substantive provision of unfair trade practices from the perspective of relevance to private law and that the legal aspects of unfair trade practices can be sought as an developed form of its own with a private law origin. Part III offers the examination of diverse substantive dimensions of unfair trade practices from the perspectives of those norms and assessment elements. In this part, it is suggested as an interpretative principle that recognition of supremacy of private autonomy-based legal formation is the premise for validating the intervention of competition law by way of unfair trade practices. Furthermore, the requirements establishing unfair trade practices are analyzed element by element by categorizing as violator, conduct and illegality. Finally, Part IV contains short conclusion.

Abstract

This article examines how to understand the substantive provision of unfair trade practices under the Korean competition law and how to establish criteria for its interpretation and assessment. The discussion here starts with a understanding that a legal relationship with which competition law works basically premises a legal relationship between private persons and that competition law has developed by establishing substantive requirements to be applied to private law relationships based on the objectives extending from the perspective of co-ordination of interests to that of trade and market order. This understanding leads to the affirmative valuation for the role of judges as experts in enforcing private laws and producing case laws in the competition law field to the effect of revitalizing discussions on competition law from a private law perspective. This article is divided into 4 sections. Following this introduction, Part II explains that the objective clause of the Korean competition law functions as a principle to interpret and apply the substantive provision of unfair trade practices from the perspective of relevance to private law and that the legal aspects of unfair trade practices can be sought as an developed form of its own with a private law origin. Part III offers the examination of diverse substantive dimensions of unfair trade practices from the perspectives of those norms and assessment elements. In this part, it is suggested as an interpretative principle that recognition of supremacy of private autonomy-based legal formation is the premise for validating the intervention of competition law by way of unfair trade practices. Furthermore, the requirements establishing unfair trade practices are analyzed element by element by categorizing as violator, conduct and illegality. Finally, Part IV contains short conclusion.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. 곽윤직 편, ": 총칙(1)" (1992), 박영사
  2. 권오승, "(제5판)소비자보호법" (2005), 법문사
  3. 권오승, "경제법(제6판)" (2008), 법문사
  4. 권재열, "경제법" (2005), 법원사
  5. 박상용, "(개정판)경제법원론" (2006), 박영사
  6. 박세일, "(개정판)법경제학" (2004), 박영사
  7. 송정원, "해설 카르텔 및 불공정거래행위 규제" (2005), 박영사
  8. 신현윤, "(제2판)경제법" (2007), 법문사
  9. 양명조, "경제법강의(제5판)" (2007), 신조사
  10. 이기수, "경제법(제6판)" (2004), 세창출판사
  11. 이호영, "독점규제법의 이론과 실무" (2006), 홍문사
  12. 임영철, "공정거래법:해설과 논점" (2007), 법문사
  13. 정호열, "(제2판)경제법" (2008), 박영사
  14. Gerber,David J, "Law and Competition in Twentieth Century Europe:Protecting Prometheus" (2001), Oxford University Press
  15. Hovenkamp, Herbert, "Federal Antitrust Policy:The Law of Competition and its Practice(2nd Ed.)", West Group, ~ (1999)
  16. Jones, Alison, "EC Competition Law(3rd Ed.)" (2008), Oxford University Press
  17. Rittner,F., "Wirtschaftsrech", Heidelberg: C. F. M?ler, ~ (1987)
  18. Rittner, F., "Wettbewerbs-und Kartellrecht", Heidelberg: C. F. M?ler, ~ (1999)
  19. 김영갑, "경제법학의 현황과 발전 방향", 재판자료, 87 (2000), 경제법의 제문제, 법원도서관
  20. 김화진, "기업집단 지배구조에 대한 법적 평가와 바람직한 기업지배구조", 대한변호사협회 제57회 변호사연수회 강연자료, ~ (2006)
  21. 이문지, "공정거래법의 목적", 경영법률, 8 (1998), 한국경영법률학회
  22. 이봉의,"불공정거래행위의 위법성",권오승 편, "공정거래와 법치", 공정거래와 법치 (2004), 법문사
  23. 이봉의, "공정거래법의 목적과 경쟁제한행위의 위법성", 경제법판례연구, 2 (2005), 법문사
  24. 이봉의, "보험산업에서의 불공정거래행위에 관한 경쟁법적 고찰", BFL, (29) (2008), 서울대학교 금융법센터
  25. 임원택, "불공정거래행위에 관한 연구" (2003), 한국개발연구원
  26. 주순식, "경쟁정책의 목적과 소비자", 공정거래법강의 IV: 공정거래와 법치 (2004), 법문사
  27. 차성민, "독점규제법상 사업자 개념에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2002
  28. 홍대식, "독점규제법상 불공정거래행위의 사법적 효력", 사법논집, 30 (1999), 법원도서관
  29. 홍대식, "우월적지위의 남용행위의 위법성 판단기준", 경쟁법연구, 7 (2001), 한국경쟁법학회
  30. 홍대식, "카르텔 규제의 집행: 행정적 집행수단과 법원의 역할을 중심으로", 경쟁법연구, 12 (2005), 법문사
  31. 홍대식, "불공정거래행위와 공서양속", 비교사법, 14(1)통권 : 36호 (2007), 한국비교사법학회
  32. 홍명수, "수직적 거래제한에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.1997
  33. Hobbs, Caswell O, "Antitrust and Consumer Protection-Exploring the Common Ground", Prepared Remarks at the Federal Trade Commission 90th Anniversary Symposium, ~ (2004)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)