유통분야 불공정거래행위에 대한 제재의 재구성
Rethinking Sanction of Unfair Trade Practices in Distribution Sector
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Distribution Law concerning unfair trade practices(hereafter “the relevant Distribution Law) aims to promoting fair trade order and for this purpose it includes administrative, criminal and civil sanctions. Meanwhile, the Korea Fair Trade Commission(hereafter “the KFTC”) has tried to enhance deterrence effect by means of imposing enormous fines and facilitating private enforcement e.g. damage actions. However, this approach seems to be inefficient, especially because the administrative sanction has been focused on undertakings, not persons who are directly engaged in the actual infringements and have an incentive to commit unfair practices. In principal, fines cannot be imposed on individuals; they are hard to take criminal responsibility due to the KFTC’s reluctance to file criminal request to the Prosecutor General. Calculating corporate fines are mainly based on the “relevant turnover” of the challenged undertakings, which has not any rationale in terms of relevance, appropriateness and proportionality criteria and lacks any coherence under the relevant Distribution Law system. Excessive fine is not a panacea. What matters, is who is to undertake responsibility for that infringement. In this context, it is suggested de lege ferenda that the KFTC shall impose fines, in addition to an undertaking(more exactly the company ad a legal person), on representatives, directors or persons those act to the benefit of that undertaking. As a rule, wider application of criminal sanction through abolition of eliminating the KFTC’s exclusive complaint, is acceptable so far as considered gradually.
Abstract
The Distribution Law concerning unfair trade practices(hereafter “the relevant Distribution Law) aims to promoting fair trade order and for this purpose it includes administrative, criminal and civil sanctions. Meanwhile, the Korea Fair Trade Commission(hereafter “the KFTC”) has tried to enhance deterrence effect by means of imposing enormous fines and facilitating private enforcement e.g. damage actions. However, this approach seems to be inefficient, especially because the administrative sanction has been focused on undertakings, not persons who are directly engaged in the actual infringements and have an incentive to commit unfair practices. In principal, fines cannot be imposed on individuals; they are hard to take criminal responsibility due to the KFTC’s reluctance to file criminal request to the Prosecutor General. Calculating corporate fines are mainly based on the “relevant turnover” of the challenged undertakings, which has not any rationale in terms of relevance, appropriateness and proportionality criteria and lacks any coherence under the relevant Distribution Law system. Excessive fine is not a panacea. What matters, is who is to undertake responsibility for that infringement. In this context, it is suggested de lege ferenda that the KFTC shall impose fines, in addition to an undertaking(more exactly the company ad a legal person), on representatives, directors or persons those act to the benefit of that undertaking. As a rule, wider application of criminal sanction through abolition of eliminating the KFTC’s exclusive complaint, is acceptable so far as considered gradually.
참고문헌 (17)
- 김두진, "공정거래법 집행의 이원화를 통한 효율성 강화 방안", 법조, 57(11), pp.122~153 (2008), 법조협회
- 손수진, "공정거래법상 전속고발제도에 관한 연구", 법과정책연구, 11(1), pp.115~132 (2011), 한국법정책학회
- 이봉의, "공정거래법상 과징금 산정과 법치국가원리", 경쟁법연구, 24, pp.3~29 (2011), 한국경쟁법학회
- 이봉의, "대규모유통업법상 과징금 산정의 근본 문제", 유통법연구, 3(1) (2016), 한국유통법학회
- 이봉의, "한국형 시장경제의 심화와 경제법의 역할", 서울대학교 법학, 58(1), pp.107~134 (2017), 법학연구소
- 이선희, "한국 경쟁법의 사적 집행제도의 개요와 향후 발전방향", 경쟁법연구, 29, pp.279~307 (2014), 한국경쟁법학회
- 최영홍, "대규모유통업법의 제정과 운용상 쟁점", 경쟁법연구, 25, pp.3~36 (2012), 한국경쟁법학회
- 과징금 산정에 있어 관련 매출액에 관한 연구, "홍대식", 공정거래위원회, ~ (2009)
- Aaron Khan, "Rethinking Sanctions for Breaching EU Competition Law : Is Director Disqualification the Answer?", World Competition, 35(1) (2012)
- Giuliano Amato, "Antitrust and the Bounds of Power" (1997), Hart
- G. S. Becker, "Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach", Journal of Political Economy, 76, pp.169~ (1968)
- Joseph Harrington, "Comment on Antitrust Sanctions", Competition Policy International, 6(2) (2010)
- Jürgen Schwarze, "Europäisches Kartellbußgelder im Lichte übergeordneter Vertrags- und Verfassungsgrundsätze", EuR (2009)
- The Secretariat of OECD, "Cartels: Sanctions against Individuals", Executive Summary, OECD Journal of Competition Law and Practice, 9(3) (2007)
- W. M. Landes, "Optimal Sanctions for Antitrust Violations", The Uni. of Chicago Law Review, 50, pp.652~ (1983)
- W. P. J. Wils, "Should Private Antitrust Enforcement Be Encouraged in Europe?", World Competition, 26(3) (2003)
- W. P. J. Wils, "Optimal Antitrust Fines: Theory and Practice", World Competition, 29(2) (2006)
