본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

블로그 광고에 대한 규제 -경제적 이해관계 미공개의 경우를 중심으로-

The Regulation of Blog Advertising - focusing on the case of undisclosed "economic interests" -

0

조회

0

다운로드

15

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The advertising industry as well as the recommendations and guarantees that support advertising have been expanding into new mediums for years. Social media (blogs, business networks, enterprise social networks, forums, microblogs, photo sharing, etc) is computer-mediated tool that allow people to create, share or exchange information, career interests, ideas, and pictures / videos in virtual communities and networks. Advertisers are also attempting to connect with consumers through social media, reality television, and other non-traditional forms of advertising. These marketing methods are called “Viral Marketing” or “Buzz Marketing”. As a result of this continual growth, the KFTC amended the 『Guidelines for examination on labeling and advertising of recommendation, guarantee, etc ("The Guidelines")』. Under the amendments, The Guidelines provide that statements in new media fall within the scope of The Guidelines when the “economic interests (material connections)” exist between recommender and advertisers. If the economic interests exists, The Guidelines advise parties to disclose their relationship to the consuming public through their choice of consumer-generated media. The "economic interests" are informations that could impact the weight or credibility a consumer gives to the recommendation. Because of the viral nature of social media, advertisers must be even more vigilant to ensure that marketers behind advertising campaigns (especially social media marketing campaigns) consider 『Labeling and Advertising Act』 and regulations and do not run afoul of these laws. In the interest of providing consumers with full disclosure, The Guidelines require bloggers to disclose any "economic interests" they have with advertisers of any products that they recommend on their blogs. Bloggers also may be liable for deceptive labeling or advertising statements made in the course of their blogging. Disclosure of "economic interests" must be clear and conspicuous and language should be easily understood and unambiguous. The scale of "economic interests" must be disclosed.

Abstract

The advertising industry as well as the recommendations and guarantees that support advertising have been expanding into new mediums for years. Social media (blogs, business networks, enterprise social networks, forums, microblogs, photo sharing, etc) is computer-mediated tool that allow people to create, share or exchange information, career interests, ideas, and pictures / videos in virtual communities and networks. Advertisers are also attempting to connect with consumers through social media, reality television, and other non-traditional forms of advertising. These marketing methods are called “Viral Marketing” or “Buzz Marketing”. As a result of this continual growth, the KFTC amended the 『Guidelines for examination on labeling and advertising of recommendation, guarantee, etc ("The Guidelines")』. Under the amendments, The Guidelines provide that statements in new media fall within the scope of The Guidelines when the “economic interests (material connections)” exist between recommender and advertisers. If the economic interests exists, The Guidelines advise parties to disclose their relationship to the consuming public through their choice of consumer-generated media. The "economic interests" are informations that could impact the weight or credibility a consumer gives to the recommendation. Because of the viral nature of social media, advertisers must be even more vigilant to ensure that marketers behind advertising campaigns (especially social media marketing campaigns) consider 『Labeling and Advertising Act』 and regulations and do not run afoul of these laws. In the interest of providing consumers with full disclosure, The Guidelines require bloggers to disclose any "economic interests" they have with advertisers of any products that they recommend on their blogs. Bloggers also may be liable for deceptive labeling or advertising statements made in the course of their blogging. Disclosure of "economic interests" must be clear and conspicuous and language should be easily understood and unambiguous. The scale of "economic interests" must be disclosed.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. 공정거래위원회, "일부 블로그의 상품 추천․보증글, 사실은 대가받고 작성된 광고!, 2014. 11. 3", 보도자료, ~ (2014)
  2. 박미희, "파워블로거의 소비자문제와 개선방안" (2012), 한국소비자원
  3. 박수영, "공정거래법해설(제3판)" (2015), 도서출판 fides
  4. 박수영, "표시광고법" (2004), 도서출판 학우
  5. Jessica Godell, "Consumer-Generated Media And Advertising—Are They One And The Same? An Analysis Of The Amended Ftc Guides Concerning The Use Of Endorsements And Testimonials In Advertising", The John Marshall Law School Review of Intellectual Property Law, 10 (2010)
  6. Lucille M. Ponte, "Men Posing as Ordinary Consumers: The Essential Role of Self-Regulation and Industry Ethics on Decreasing Deceptive Online Consumer Ratings and Reviews", The John Marshall Law School Review of Intellectual Property Law, 12 (2013)
  7. Michael J. Patterson, "Experts, Celebrities and Bloggers Beware: The FTC Publishes Revised Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising", Loyola Consumer Law Review, 22 (2010)
  8. Paul Moura, "Harmless Tweets or Deceptive Speech? The Problem of Stealth Marketing in New Media, and the Dual Regulatory Roles of the FTC and the Market for Social Capital", Whittier Law Review, 33 (2012)
  9. Recent Regulation, "Internet Law - Advertising and Consumer Protection - FTC Extends Endorsement and Testimonial Guides To Cover Bloggers. - 74 Fed. Reg. 53,124 (Oct. 15, 2009) (to be codified at 16 C.F.R. pt. 255)", Harvard Law Review, 123 (2010)
  10. Robert Sprague, "Regulating Online Buzz Marketing: Untangling a Web of Deceit", American Business Law Journal, 47(3) (2010)
  11. JARO, "口コミは法的措置の対象となるか", プレスリリース審査トピックス, ~ (2015)
  12. 植木邦之, "判․審決例からみた不當表示法", 別冊NBL, (36) (1996), 商事法務硏究會

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)