인터넷 경제 하에서의 시장지배적지위의 인정 - 중국의 “치후360대 텅쉰QQ” 사건을 중심으로
dentifying Relevant Market Dominance Under Network Economy: Focusing 3Q Case
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract: With the popularity of the Internet and the advance of "Internet plus" economy, the internet economy continues to heat up quickly and is becoming a new economic model to promote national economy. Comparing with traditional economy, the network economy is a two-side market, the market structure is dynamic and competitive. The methods to identify the traditional market dominance are challenged under network economy circumstances. We should uses different ideas and methods comparing with the traditional model when we identify the relevant market and its dominance under network economy. We should combine SSNIP and SSNDQ, can not ignore characteristics of the two-side market when to identify the relevant product market, particular attention of consumers , language, cultural differences and other factors in the relevant geographic market, and can not ignore the relevant time market at the same time. The market barriers to entry will become a key factor to identify the relevant market dominance in internet economy in future.
Abstract
Abstract: With the popularity of the Internet and the advance of "Internet plus" economy, the internet economy continues to heat up quickly and is becoming a new economic model to promote national economy. Comparing with traditional economy, the network economy is a two-side market, the market structure is dynamic and competitive. The methods to identify the traditional market dominance are challenged under network economy circumstances. We should uses different ideas and methods comparing with the traditional model when we identify the relevant market and its dominance under network economy. We should combine SSNIP and SSNDQ, can not ignore characteristics of the two-side market when to identify the relevant product market, particular attention of consumers , language, cultural differences and other factors in the relevant geographic market, and can not ignore the relevant time market at the same time. The market barriers to entry will become a key factor to identify the relevant market dominance in internet economy in future.
참고문헌 (35)
- 陳兵, "反壟斷法實施與消費者保護協同發展", 法學, (9) (2013)
- 張江筣, "網絡平臺經營者競爭與反壟斷法規制", 中外法學, (1) (2015)
- 殷繼國, "反壟斷執法思路辨析: 定性分析抑或定量分析", 價格理論與實踐, (12) (2014)
- 許延東, "网络經濟視覺下濫用市場支配地位行爲的法律規制——兼評“360與QQ事件”", 西南石油大學學報（社會科學版), (4) (2012)
- 黃民禮, "雙邊市場與市場形態的演進", 首都經濟貿易大學學報, (3) (2007)
- 張素倫, "互聯網服務的市場支配地位的認定", 河北法学, (3) (2013)
- 李小明, "反壟斷法中濫用市場支配地位的違法認定問題硏究", 河北法學, (11) (2007)
- 吳宏偉, "互聯網行業相關市場界定硏究", 甘肅理論學刊, (1) (2013)
- 邵海鵬, "從3Q案看互聯網反壟斷得失", 第一財經日報, (B06) (2014)
- 顧正平, "奇虎訴騰訊反壟斷案件焦點問題评述評述", 律商中國法律透視, (91) (2015)
- 佟姝, "百度被訴壟斷案背後的思考——唐山市人人信息服務有限公司訴北京百度網訊科技有限公司壟斷糾紛案評析", 中国專利與商標, (1) (2010)
- 楊菂, "中國互聯網市場反壟斷的法經濟學分析: 以“3Q”大戰爲例", 年第十届中國法經濟學論壇論文集 (2012)
- 葉高芬, "互聯網時代反壟斷法實施的前沿問題", 中國社会科學報, (A07) (2012)
- 吳宏偉, "互聯網行業相關市場界定硏究", 甘肅理論學刊, (1) (2013)
- 時建中, "<反壟斷法>中相關市場的含意及其界定", 重慶社會科學, (4) (2009)
- 孔祥俊, "反壟斷原理" (2001), 中國法制出版社
- 胡麗, "互聯網企業市場支配地位認定的理論反思與制度重構", 現代法學, (2) (2013)
- 中国互联网络信息中心, "第36次中国互聯網發展狀況統計報告", ~
- 北京市第一中級人民法院, "中民初字第845號民事判決書", ~ (2009)
- 北京市高級人民法院, "高民終字第489號民事判決書", ~ (2010)
- 廣東省高級人民法院, "粤高法民三初字第2號民事判決書", ~ (2011)
- 中華人民共和國最高人民法院, "民三終字第4號民事判決書", ~ (2013)
- Antitrust In The New Economy, U Chicago Law &Economics, "Richard A. Posner", ~, pp.Working Paper No.106 (2000)
- David S. Evans, "Antitrust Issues Raised by the Emerging Global Internet Economy", Northwestern University Law Review, 102(4) (2008)
- Susan Ning, "The Supreme Court Goes Online with Anti-Monopoly Law Principles: A Review of Qihoo v.s. Tencent Abuse of Market Dominance Case", ~ (2014)
- The Curious Case of Competition and Quality, "Ariel Ezrachi", ~ (2014)
- Christian Ahlborn, "Competition Policy in the New Economy: is European Competition Law up to the Challenge?", European Competition Law Review, 22(5) (2001)
- "European Commission Decision Case No. COMP", M.4731, Google, pp.2008, ~
- "European Commission Decision Case No. COMP", M.5727, Microsoft, pp.2010, ~
- "European Commission Decision Case No. COMP", M.4731, Google, pp.2008, ~