본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

거래공정화 규제체계상 ‘대리점법’의 지위와 역할

The Status and Role of the Act of Fair Transaction in Agency under the Korean Fair Trade Legislations

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Among legislations governed by the Korea Fair Trade Commission, the portion and importance of the norms regarding fair trade have been contiguously growing. In those circumstances, another legislation(the Act on Fairness of Agency Transaction) has recently joined the ranks of the norms. The new legislation pursues to regulate unfair transaction which can be occurred around the environment of the agency. On the one hand, this newly enacted law follows existing legislations’ example which have been showing unique and strong way of approach in the korean legal system on the unfair trade problem. But it shows differentiated aspects from other related legislations as well, in terms of the characteristics of the regulation, the relationship with the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act(hereinafter ‘MRFTA’) and other collateral legislations such as the Subcontract Act, the Franchise Act etc. The necessity of enacting a new law was not that vivid and independent from the MRFTA comparing to other collateral laws. Fundamentally, whether intervention of the government on unfair trade issue through this kind of legislation is appropriate or even effective is not clear. This article is composed on critical mind on the newly enacted Act on Fairness of Agency Transaction. It tries to investigate distinct characteristic of the law, and instead of the conclusion it points out some limitations and problems of the law in the aspect of fair trade regulation system in Korea .

Abstract

Among legislations governed by the Korea Fair Trade Commission, the portion and importance of the norms regarding fair trade have been contiguously growing. In those circumstances, another legislation(the Act on Fairness of Agency Transaction) has recently joined the ranks of the norms. The new legislation pursues to regulate unfair transaction which can be occurred around the environment of the agency. On the one hand, this newly enacted law follows existing legislations’ example which have been showing unique and strong way of approach in the korean legal system on the unfair trade problem. But it shows differentiated aspects from other related legislations as well, in terms of the characteristics of the regulation, the relationship with the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act(hereinafter ‘MRFTA’) and other collateral legislations such as the Subcontract Act, the Franchise Act etc. The necessity of enacting a new law was not that vivid and independent from the MRFTA comparing to other collateral laws. Fundamentally, whether intervention of the government on unfair trade issue through this kind of legislation is appropriate or even effective is not clear. This article is composed on critical mind on the newly enacted Act on Fairness of Agency Transaction. It tries to investigate distinct characteristic of the law, and instead of the conclusion it points out some limitations and problems of the law in the aspect of fair trade regulation system in Korea .

참고문헌 (10)

  1. 강선희, "대리점 거래에 대한 연구", 중앙법학, 15(4), pp.409~442 (2013), 중앙법학회
  2. 김건식, "대리점법 제정 의의와 규제대상에 관한 검토", 선진상사법률연구, (74), pp.57~80 (2016), 법무부
  3. 김용중, "대리점법의 문제점과 향후 과제", 법학연구, 57(2), pp.171~197 (2016), 법학연구소
  4. 손계준, "대리점법 국회 통과를 지켜보며", 전자신문, 2016.1.21.일자 기고문, ~ (2016)
  5. 오금석, "대규모유통업법: 이론과 실무" (2012), 박영사
  6. 이봉의, "大⋅中小企業 共生發展을 위한 法의 役割", 저스티스, 134(2), pp.221~238 (2013), 한국법학원
  7. 이 황, "대리점 보호법 ‘乙의 눈물’ 닦아줄까?", 세계일보 2015.8.24.일자 기고문, ~ (2015)
  8. 조혜신, "대리점거래에서의 밀어내기 등 불공정거래행위에 대한 경쟁법적 규제 방안 검토", 법학연구, 16(2), pp.53~85 (2013), 법학연구소
  9. 최영홍, "대리점법에 대한 법리적 검토", 경제법연구, 15(1), pp.175~204 (2016), 한국경제법학회
  10. 대리점거래 공정화를 위한 제도개선방안 연구, "한국경쟁법학회", 공정거래위원회, ~ (2013)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)