가맹사업법상 계약의 존속에 대한 규제
The Termination and Renewal of Contracts in the Korean Franchise Act
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The issue of contract termination and renewal is an important matter in determining the parties' interests in the continuity of the contract, and this becomes more important in the so-called 'distribution contracts'. Distribution contracts are not only one-time or short-term, but are retained on a recurring and long-term basis, in which the nature of these continuing contracts forces the parties to be bound here for a long period of time and rely on the trust of the parties to resolve the various problems arising from the contractual relationship. However, in a distribution contract, it is common to see situations in which asymmetry between parties is structured and solidified due to circumstances in which either party is in a dominant market position or controls accessibility to consumers. This is a situation in which autonomous determination, which is the basis for contract freedom, is infringed, and in this case, the law's intervention is required. Special distribution-related laws, such as the Franchise Act, the Large Retail Business Act, and the Agency Act, can be said to limit the freedom to decide whether a contract is retained or not through regulatory laws based on the principle of good faith. The nature of such contracts in the distribution requires that the various issues arising from the contract relationship be treated differently than in the general contract. Much of it may be left to negotiation and agreement between the parties in a contract of equal standing, but in a major distribution contract in which the symmetry of the status is not guaranteed due to structural conditions, 'the objective legitimacy(das objectiv Richtige)' should be achieved through legislation. At present, since the broadest range of regulations is in Franchise Act of Korea, we could take an approach to examine whether the rules on the termination and renewal of contracts can be extended to the Agency Act or the Large Retail Business Act. Of course, the key to this is to have a review based on an understanding of the nature of each transaction. Recently, there has been discussion on introducing regulations related to contract termination and renewal in other distribution-related laws, especially the Agency Act, and a proposed revision to the law has been prepared to reflect them. This is because it has been pointed out that unfair business practices related to the termination or renewal of contracts are taking place in agency transactions. Meanwhile, the Fair Trade Commission's recently announced measures to prevent unfair practices in dealing with agency transactions said that it will set up at least three years of contract renewal requirements in standard agency contracts considering the proper duration of each transaction. While this is not yet set as a legal amendment, it may be possible to try legislative solutions in the future while looking at the improvement in reality. Of course, the provisions concerning contract termination and renewal under the Franchise Act can be a primary reference. However, it should not be missed that a gradual increase in the level of regulation in terms of 'best regulatory levels' would be desirable. In other words, it is necessary to step up to the legal level, starting from a low level, such as the introduction of standard contracts or the preparation of guidelines, with checking the effectiveness of regulations.
Abstract
The issue of contract termination and renewal is an important matter in determining the parties' interests in the continuity of the contract, and this becomes more important in the so-called 'distribution contracts'. Distribution contracts are not only one-time or short-term, but are retained on a recurring and long-term basis, in which the nature of these continuing contracts forces the parties to be bound here for a long period of time and rely on the trust of the parties to resolve the various problems arising from the contractual relationship. However, in a distribution contract, it is common to see situations in which asymmetry between parties is structured and solidified due to circumstances in which either party is in a dominant market position or controls accessibility to consumers. This is a situation in which autonomous determination, which is the basis for contract freedom, is infringed, and in this case, the law's intervention is required. Special distribution-related laws, such as the Franchise Act, the Large Retail Business Act, and the Agency Act, can be said to limit the freedom to decide whether a contract is retained or not through regulatory laws based on the principle of good faith. The nature of such contracts in the distribution requires that the various issues arising from the contract relationship be treated differently than in the general contract. Much of it may be left to negotiation and agreement between the parties in a contract of equal standing, but in a major distribution contract in which the symmetry of the status is not guaranteed due to structural conditions, 'the objective legitimacy(das objectiv Richtige)' should be achieved through legislation. At present, since the broadest range of regulations is in Franchise Act of Korea, we could take an approach to examine whether the rules on the termination and renewal of contracts can be extended to the Agency Act or the Large Retail Business Act. Of course, the key to this is to have a review based on an understanding of the nature of each transaction. Recently, there has been discussion on introducing regulations related to contract termination and renewal in other distribution-related laws, especially the Agency Act, and a proposed revision to the law has been prepared to reflect them. This is because it has been pointed out that unfair business practices related to the termination or renewal of contracts are taking place in agency transactions. Meanwhile, the Fair Trade Commission's recently announced measures to prevent unfair practices in dealing with agency transactions said that it will set up at least three years of contract renewal requirements in standard agency contracts considering the proper duration of each transaction. While this is not yet set as a legal amendment, it may be possible to try legislative solutions in the future while looking at the improvement in reality. Of course, the provisions concerning contract termination and renewal under the Franchise Act can be a primary reference. However, it should not be missed that a gradual increase in the level of regulation in terms of 'best regulatory levels' would be desirable. In other words, it is necessary to step up to the legal level, starting from a low level, such as the introduction of standard contracts or the preparation of guidelines, with checking the effectiveness of regulations.
참고문헌 (26)
- 본사-대리점거래관계 서면실태조사 결과 및 제도개선 방안, "공정거래위원회", ~ (2013)
- 권오승, "시장경제와 법" (2006), 서울대학교출판부
- 권오승, "경쟁질서와 사법상의 법률관계", 비교사법, 14(1), pp.77~108 (2007), 한국사법학회[DOI]
- 대리점거래의 공정화에 관한 법률의 규제와 내용 분석, "김건식", KOFAIR, ~ (2016)
- 김건식, "대리점법 제정 의의와 규제대상에 관한 검토", 선진상사법률연구, (74), pp.57~80 (2016), 법무부
- 김윤정, "대리점법의 주요 내용 및 법적 쟁점", 법제이슈브리프, (20) (2017), 한국법제연구원
- 김지환, "가맹사업거래에 있어서 가맹계약의 해지와 갱신거절에 관한 법적 문제점", 유통법연구, 4(2) (2017)
- 노기엽, "프랜차이즈 창업경영론" (2013), 학현사
- 류석희, "가맹계약의 갱신에 관한 「가맹사업법」 제13조의 재검토", 재산법연구, 32(2), pp.147~166 (2015), 한국재산법학회
- 송인방, "분쟁사례를 통해 살펴본 개정 가맹사업법의 의미", 기업법연구, 28(1), pp.295~325 (2014), 한국기업법학회
- 송일두, "대리점계약의 종료에 관한 연구", 경제법연구, 18(1), pp.3~31 (2019), 한국경제법학회[DOI]
- 양창수, "계약법" (2015), 박영사
- 염규석, "개정 가맹사업거래의 공정화에 관한 법률의 주요쟁점 및 문제점", 재산법연구, 24(3), pp.189~220 (2008), 한국재산법학회
- 염규석, "가맹사업거래(프렌차이즈)분쟁의 유형과 해결방안", 재산법연구, 23(1), pp.209~245 (2006), 한국재산법학회
- 윤성운, "가맹사업법의 최근 쟁점과 개선방안", 경쟁법연구, 37, pp.59~91 (2018), 한국경쟁법학회[DOI]
- 장보은, "계속적 계약의 종료와 그 제한가능성", 비교사법, 25(1), pp.1~30 (2018), 한국사법학회[DOI]
- 조일윤, "계속적 계약으로서의 프랜차이즈계약의 종료", 동아법학, 35 (2004)
- 조혜신, "「대규모유통업에서의 거래 공정화에 관한 법률」의 제정 의의에 대한 검토", 법학논총, 36(2), pp.3~33 (2012), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 조혜신, "대리점거래에서의 밀어내기 등 불공정거래행위에 대한 경쟁법적 규제 방안 검토", 법학연구, 16(2), pp.53~85 (2013), 법학연구소
- 주요 선진국의 가맹사업거래 관련 법제 및 상생협력사례 연구, "조혜신", 공정거래위원회, ~ (2017)
- 최영홍, "가맹계약의 해지에 대한 규제와 그 한계", 비교사법, 14(2), pp.253~284 (2007), 한국사법학회[DOI]
- 최영홍, "대리점법에 대한 법리적 검토", 경제법연구, 15(1), pp.175~204 (2016), 한국경제법학회[DOI]
- 최영홍, "유통법의 의의와 지도원리", 유통법연구, (창간) (2014)
- Berkoff, "Fundamentals of Franchising" (2016), ABA
- David Gurnick, "Distribution Law of the United States" (2015), JURIS
- Meiklejhon, Alexander M., "Franchising: Cases, Materials, & Problems" (2013), ABA
