본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

다단계판매에 있어 부담부과행위, 의무부과행위 및 사실상 금전거래행위의 판단기준 검토

A study on regulations about excessive burden, excessive money collection, and making a monetary transaction in multi-level marketing

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The Act on door-to-door sales, etc. have various provisions about multi-level marketing to restrain speculative transactions. The prohibitions of taking an excessive burden to salesperson, excessive money collection, and making a monetary transaction are typical regulations. But in practically, it's not easy to apply these regulations properly because the requirements of these provisions are not explicitly classified. According to the relative cases, the prohibition of taking an excessive burden is applied to the transactions of goods and services. On the other hand, the prohibition of taking excessive money collection is applied to collect money related to imposing obligations without transactions of goods and services. And about the status of salesperson which is a condition of the regulations, the Supreme Court seems to judge whether it is actually a salesperson who receives a substantial amount of sponsorship money. In application of the prohibition of making a monetary transaction, the Supreme Court allowed a standard of judgment of lower instance which presented the factors like objective value of the goods, purchase status, commodity price, refund policy, actual quality as a matter of consideration. Recently, the Supreme Court allowed a judgement of lower instance about receiving advance payments does not automatically constitute a monetary transaction. Given the attitude of current laws and precedents, it is necessary to come up with an appropriate regulation of receiving advance payments. In addition, the regulations about prohibiting excessive burden and excessive money collection need to be combined to one provision.

Abstract

The Act on door-to-door sales, etc. have various provisions about multi-level marketing to restrain speculative transactions. The prohibitions of taking an excessive burden to salesperson, excessive money collection, and making a monetary transaction are typical regulations. But in practically, it's not easy to apply these regulations properly because the requirements of these provisions are not explicitly classified. According to the relative cases, the prohibition of taking an excessive burden is applied to the transactions of goods and services. On the other hand, the prohibition of taking excessive money collection is applied to collect money related to imposing obligations without transactions of goods and services. And about the status of salesperson which is a condition of the regulations, the Supreme Court seems to judge whether it is actually a salesperson who receives a substantial amount of sponsorship money. In application of the prohibition of making a monetary transaction, the Supreme Court allowed a standard of judgment of lower instance which presented the factors like objective value of the goods, purchase status, commodity price, refund policy, actual quality as a matter of consideration. Recently, the Supreme Court allowed a judgement of lower instance about receiving advance payments does not automatically constitute a monetary transaction. Given the attitude of current laws and precedents, it is necessary to come up with an appropriate regulation of receiving advance payments. In addition, the regulations about prohibiting excessive burden and excessive money collection need to be combined to one provision.

참고문헌 (9)

  1. 곽관훈, "다단계판매산업 규제의 합리적 개선방안", 유통법연구, 4(1) (2017)
  2. 김현수, "방문판매법상 다단계판매의 법적 문제점과 공제조합 운영의 개선방안에 관한 연구", 박사, 법학과, pp.2018
  3. 김홍석, "다단계판매와 방문판매법에 관한 해설" (2008), 잎새
  4. 김홍석, "개정 방문판매법 해설" (2012), 잎새
  5. 박수영, "소비자법해설" (2016), 피데스
  6. 양명조, "경제법" (2016), 신조사
  7. 이기수, "경제법" (2012), 세창출판사
  8. 이호영, "소비자보호법" (2018), 홍문사
  9. 장윤순, "다단계판매 규제 및 개선방안에 관한 연구", 법학논총, 38(1), pp.515~535 (2018), 법학연구소[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)