계약자유와 공정거래
Freedom of Contract and Fair Trade
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In Korea, legal order is based on private autonomy, and the private autonomy is realized through the freedom of contract. And economic order is based on the market economy. In order for the market economy to function well, free and fair competition should be maintained in the market. For the purpose, the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act prohibits the various restraints of competition and unfair trade practices. The freedom of contract is permitted within the limit of compulsory laws and public order. Since the violation of the law generally corresponds to the act against the core elements of public order, the judicial effect is invalid. However some of acts that violate the law may not be regarded against public order, and all of them will not be considered valid, but in case where the self-determination of economic inferior party is infringed, it would be reasonable to consider invalid, if the term of contract is judged unfair from the point of view of objective third party in accordance with the notion of fair contract. As a criterion, the voluntary provisions in civil law, the principle of good faith and the prohibition of abuse of rights may be used.
Abstract
In Korea, legal order is based on private autonomy, and the private autonomy is realized through the freedom of contract. And economic order is based on the market economy. In order for the market economy to function well, free and fair competition should be maintained in the market. For the purpose, the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act prohibits the various restraints of competition and unfair trade practices. The freedom of contract is permitted within the limit of compulsory laws and public order. Since the violation of the law generally corresponds to the act against the core elements of public order, the judicial effect is invalid. However some of acts that violate the law may not be regarded against public order, and all of them will not be considered valid, but in case where the self-determination of economic inferior party is infringed, it would be reasonable to consider invalid, if the term of contract is judged unfair from the point of view of objective third party in accordance with the notion of fair contract. As a criterion, the voluntary provisions in civil law, the principle of good faith and the prohibition of abuse of rights may be used.
참고문헌 (19)
- 권오승, "시장경제와 법" (2009), 서울대 출판부
- 권오승, "독점규제법 이론과 실무" (2018)
- 권오승, "경쟁질서와 사법상의 법률관계", 비교사법, 14(1), pp.77~108 (2007), 한국사법학회[DOI]
- 김정후, "춘강 손주찬 교수 정년기념 경제법·상사법 논집" (1989), 박영사
- 손경한, "공정거래법 강의" (1996), 법문사
- 이봉의, "독일경쟁법" (2016), 법문사
- 이호정, "계약자유에 관한 소고", 경제논집, 12(2) (1973), 서울대학교 경제연구소
- 홍대식, "독점규제법상 불공정거래행위의 사법적 효력", 사법논집, 30 (2000), 법원도서관
- 홍대식, "불공정거래행위와 공서양속", 비교사법, 14(1), pp.109~138 (2007), 한국사법학회[DOI]
- 홍대식, "사법적 관점에서 본 불공정 거래 행위", 경쟁법연구, 18, pp.203~243 (2008), 한국경쟁법학회
- Biedenkopf, "Recht u. Wirtschaft" (1958), Verlag-Ges
- Bydlinsky, "Privatautonomie und objektive Grundlagen des verpflichtenden Rechtesgeschäfts", ~ (1967)
- Dreher, "Wettbewerbs- und Kartellrecht" (2018), C.F. Müller
- Raiser, "Vertragsfreiheit heute", JZ (1958)
- Schmidt-Rimpler, "Zum Vertragsproblem", Festschrift für Raiser, ~ (1974)
- Schmidt-Rimpler, "AcP.147", ~ (1941)
- Schmidt-Rimpler, "Art, Wirtschaftsrecht", ~
- Schmidt-Salzer, "Grundfragen des Vertragsrechts im Zivil-und Verwaltungsrecht", NJW (1971)
- Wolf, "Rechtsgeschäftliche Entscheidungsfreiheit und vertraglicher Intressenausgleich", ~ (1970)
