위내시경 과정에 대해서 서면과 구두설명을 함께 받은 군과 구두설명만 받은 군 사이 불안감과 이해도 비교
Combined written and oral information about gastrointestinal endoscopy compared with oral information alone
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
More recently, malpractice claim frequency has increased for endoscopists because they perform invasive procedures. Appropriate informed consents associated with few claims. Little is known about how to deliver relevant information to patients scheduled for gastrointestinal endoscopy most effectively. From May to July 2009, 486 clients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were enrolled in this study. The subjects were randomly grouped into combined written and oral information group (n= 228) and oral information group (n=258). Evaluation of quality of information was rated on scales between 1 (poor) and 5(excellent). In addition, patients rated their anxiety at the time of the procedure, how tolerable the procedure was, their pain during the procedure, whether any health problems occurred as a result of the procedure, as well as the procedure as a whole. Patients who received written information(n= 228) rated the overall quality of the information that they received higher than those who randomized to oral information(n=258) only. Differences were significant regarding information about mean information score (3.45 versus 3.0, P < 0.001). The two groups reported similar levels of anxiety at time of procedure (P = 0.935). Written information led to more favourable assessments of the quality of information and had no impact on patient anxiety nor on the overall assessment of the endoscopy. Endoscopists should clearly explain to their patients the risks, benefits and alternatives of endoscopic procedures.
Abstract
More recently, malpractice claim frequency has increased for endoscopists because they perform invasive procedures. Appropriate informed consents associated with few claims. Little is known about how to deliver relevant information to patients scheduled for gastrointestinal endoscopy most effectively. From May to July 2009, 486 clients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were enrolled in this study. The subjects were randomly grouped into combined written and oral information group (n= 228) and oral information group (n=258). Evaluation of quality of information was rated on scales between 1 (poor) and 5(excellent). In addition, patients rated their anxiety at the time of the procedure, how tolerable the procedure was, their pain during the procedure, whether any health problems occurred as a result of the procedure, as well as the procedure as a whole. Patients who received written information(n= 228) rated the overall quality of the information that they received higher than those who randomized to oral information(n=258) only. Differences were significant regarding information about mean information score (3.45 versus 3.0, P < 0.001). The two groups reported similar levels of anxiety at time of procedure (P = 0.935). Written information led to more favourable assessments of the quality of information and had no impact on patient anxiety nor on the overall assessment of the endoscopy. Endoscopists should clearly explain to their patients the risks, benefits and alternatives of endoscopic procedures.
참고문헌 (14)
- 유종윤, "상부 위장관 내시경 검사 시 보호자 참여가 환자의 동통 및 불편감에 미치는 영향", Korean Journal of Family Medicine, 29(1), pp.13~19 (2008), 대한가정의학회
- "의료 피해구제의 효율적 처리방안", 한국소비자원[URL]
- "1999년 의료분야 피해구제 분석결과", 한국소비자원[URL]
- Aabakken L, "Development and evaluation of written patient information for endoscopic procedures", Endoscopy, 29(1), pp.23~26 (1997)
- Bottrell MM, "Hospital informed consent for procedure forms:facilitating quality patient-physician interaction", Arch Surg, 135(1), pp.26~33 (2000)
- Christian F, "Combined written and oral information prior to gastrointestinal endoscopy compared with oral information alone: a randomized trial", BMC Gastroenterology, 8, pp.22~ (2008)
- Conklin LS, "Medical malpractice in gastroenterology", Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 6(6), pp.677~681 (2008)
- Gerstenberger PD, "Malpractice claims in gastrointestinal endoscopy: analysis of an insurance industry database", Gastrointest Endosc, 39(2), pp.132~138 (1993)
- Lanius M, "Does an information booklet on gastrointestinal endoscopy reduce anxiety for these examinations? Results of a randomized study with 379 patients", Z Gastroenterol, 28(12), pp.651~655 (1990)
- Levy N, "Does a detailed explanation prior to gastroscopy reduce the patient's anxiety", Endoscopy, 21(6), pp.263~265 (1989)
- Michael K, "The myth of informed consent", Am J Gastroenterol, 95(3), pp.588~589 (2000)
- Pereira SP, "Informed consent for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy", Gut, 37(1), pp.151~153 (1995)
- Van Zuuren FJ, "The effect of an information brochure on patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy", Patient Educ Couns, 64(1), pp.173~182 (2006)