본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

진료수행평가에서 실시간 및 비디오 녹화 채점 비교 분석

Comparison of Medical Students' CPX Scores between Real Time and Videotaped Rating

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류의학일반

초록

Purpose: The aim of this study was to test the reliability of the scores on medical students' CPX by real time and videotaped rating. Methods: We focused on 5 cases (hypertension, dyspnea, hematuria, fever, hemoptysis) CPX performed by forty 4-year medical students in September 2008. We analyzed the difference of scores by between real time and videotaped rating of the same raters. Results: In total scores, two cases, dyspnea (53.10±9.424, 50.95±9.669) and fever (56.73±15.910, 52.55±15.194)were statistically different between real time and videotaped rating. In dyspnea case, physical examination scores (11.60.±3.523, 10.53±3.523) were different while history taking scores of fever case (33.00±8.228,29.88±8.659) were different. Conclusion: The use of videotaped CPX rating could offer more various merits than real time rating on examiner's time, fairness of assessment needed to between different raters, candidates, sites, and then feedback to revise examinee's performance, and so on. However, there are still some works to solve such as taking more times to mark perfectively and supporting high level video-audio devices to watch and hear clearly.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to test the reliability of the scores on medical students' CPX by real time and videotaped rating. Methods: We focused on 5 cases (hypertension, dyspnea, hematuria, fever, hemoptysis) CPX performed by forty 4-year medical students in September 2008. We analyzed the difference of scores by between real time and videotaped rating of the same raters. Results: In total scores, two cases, dyspnea (53.10±9.424, 50.95±9.669) and fever (56.73±15.910, 52.55±15.194)were statistically different between real time and videotaped rating. In dyspnea case, physical examination scores (11.60.±3.523, 10.53±3.523) were different while history taking scores of fever case (33.00±8.228,29.88±8.659) were different. Conclusion: The use of videotaped CPX rating could offer more various merits than real time rating on examiner's time, fairness of assessment needed to between different raters, candidates, sites, and then feedback to revise examinee's performance, and so on. However, there are still some works to solve such as taking more times to mark perfectively and supporting high level video-audio devices to watch and hear clearly.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. Association of American Medical Education, "Emerging perspectives on the general professional education of the physician: problems, priorities and prospects" (1985), AAMC
  2. Barman A, "Critiques in the objective structured clinical examination", Ann Acad Med Singapore, 34, pp.478~482 (2005)
  3. Bergus GR, "The reliability of summative judgement based on objective structured clinical examination cased distributed across the clinical year", Med Teach, 41, pp.661~666 (2007)
  4. 박훈기, "의사국가고시에서 실기시험", Korean Journal of Medical Education, 20(4), pp.309~312 (2008), 한국의학교육학회
  5. Hodges B, "Validity and the OSCE", Med Tech, 25, pp.250~254 (2003)
  6. Humphris GM, "The objective structured video exam for assessment of communication skills", Med Educ, 34, pp.939~945 (2000)
  7. Jucith GC, "Using videotape to evaluate medical students' physical examination skills", Med Teach, 8, pp.367~372 (1986)
  8. Lee YM, "The OSCE: a new challenge to the evaluation system in Korea", Med Teach, 28, pp.377~379 (2006)
  9. McKinley RK, "Checklists for assessment and certification of clinical procedural skills omit essential competencies: a systematic review", Med Edcu, 42, pp.338~349 (2008)
  10. Newble D, "Eight years? experience with a structured clinical examination", Med Educ, 22, pp.200~2004 (1988)
  11. Newble D, "Techniques for measuring clinical competence: objective structured clinical examination", Med Educ, 38, pp.199~203 (2004)
  12. Pirashanthie VS, "Exploring the use of the videotaped objective structured clinical examination in the assessment of joint examination skills of medical students", Arthritis & Rheumatism, 57, pp.869~876 (2007)
  13. 박주현, "표준화 환자 교수자에 의한 유방진찰법 수업", Korean Journal of Medical Education, 22(4), pp.283~289 (2010), 한국의학교육학회
  14. Ram p, "Assessment of general practitioners by video observation of communicative and medical performance in daily practice: issues of validity, reliability and feasibility", Med Educ, 33, pp.447~454 (1999)
  15. Rutala PJ, "Student fatigue as a variable affecting performance in an objective structured clinical examination", Acad Med, 65, pp.53~54 (1990)
  16. Stillman PL, "Assessing clinical skills of residents with standardized patients", Ann Intern Med, 105, pp.762~771 (1986)
  17. Turner JL, "objective structured clinical exams: a critical review", Fam Med, 40, pp.574~578 (2008)
  18. Van der Vleuten C, "Assessment of clinical skills with standardized patients: state of the art", Teaching and Learning Med, 2, pp.58~76 (1990)
  19. Wass V, "Assessment of clinical competence", Lancet, 357, pp.945~949 (2001)
  20. Wessel J, "Reliability and validity of an objective structured clinical examination for physical Therapy Students", J Allied Health, 32, pp.266~269 (2003)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)