디스크확산법에 의한 Helicobacter pylori의 Clarithromycin과 Amoxicillin 항균제감수성 검사
Clarithromycin and Amoxicillin Susceptibility Testing of Helicobacter pylori by Disk Diffusion Method
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
배경: Helicobacter pylori 항균제감수성 검사는 clarithromycin에 대한 한천희석법만 Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) 지침이 정해져 있다. 본 연구에서는 임상검사실에서 H. pylori의 clarithromycin과 amoxicillin 항균제감수성 검사를 위해 디스크확산법을 평가하고자 하였다. 방법: 2005년 5월부터 2007년 5월까지 임상검체에서 분리된 140균주의 H. pylori를 대상으로 하였다. CLSI 지침에 따라 한천희석법으로 clarithromycin과 amoxicillin에 대한 최소억제농도(minimum inhibition concentration, MIC)를 구했으며, 디 스크확산법은 2μg과 15μg의 clarithromycin, 2μg과 10μg의 amoxicillin 디스크를 사용하여 5% 면양혈액 Mueller-Hinton 한천배지에서 검사하였다. 최소억제농도와 디스크 억제대를 선형회귀분석과 error rate-bounded 방법으로 비교하여 디스 크확산법의 감수성 판독 기준을 설정하였다. 결과: 한천희석법 MIC 결과 clarithromycin 내성과 중간내성의 비율은 각각 21.4%, 1.4%였으며, amoxicillin MIC가 0.5, 1, 2μg/mL인 균주는 각각 7주, 2주, 1주였다. 디스크확산법에서 clarithromycin 2μg과 15μg 디스크 억제대는 log2 MIC와 R2값이 각각 0.931, 0.923이었으며(P<0.001), 내성/중간내성 기준은 각각 12/28 mm와 23/39 mm로 설정하였다. Amoxicillin 2μg와 10μg 디스크 억제대는 log2 MIC와 R2값이 각각 0.478과 0.421이었으며(P<0.001), 억제대의 판독기준은 MIC 내성 기준을 2μg/mL로 하면 21 mm와 33 mm였다. 2μg 디스크에서는 억제대 지름이 모두 60 mm 미만인데 비해 15μg clarithromycin 디스크에서는 61.4% (86/140), 10μg amoxicillin 디스크에서는 75.7% (106/140)가 억제대 지름이 60 mm 이상이 었다. 결론: Clarithromycin, amoxicillin 디스크확산법은 억제대의 지름이 MIC와 높은 상관성을 보였으며, MIC에 의한 감수성 판정과 100% 일치하는 억제대 지름의 판정기준을 설정할 수 있었다. 2μg 디스크의 감수성 판정기준이 28 mm 이하로 더 적절하였으며 두 디스크를 하나의 평판배지에서 검사할 수 있었다.
Abstract
Background: CLSI provides a guideline only for a agar dilution method of testing clarithromycin susceptibility for Helicobacter pylori. This study was to evaluate a disk diffusion method for clarithromycin and amoxicillin. Methods: One hundred and forty clinical isolates of H. pylori isolated from May 2005 to May 2007 were tested by the CLSI agar dilution method and a disk diffusion method using 2μg (2CLR) and 15μg (15CLR) clarithromycin disks and 2μg (2AMX) and 10μg (10AMX) amoxicillin disks. The interpretation criteria used for the disk diffusion method were established by linear regression and error rate-bounded method for disk diffusion zone of inhibition (DDZ) compared to MIC. Results: Resistance and intermediate rates to clarithromycin were 21.4% and 1.4%, respectively. A number of isolates with MIC 0.5, 1, and 2 (μg/mL) to amoxicillin were 7, 2, and 1, respectively. For 2CLR and 15CLR, the coefficients of determination (R2) between MIC and DDZ were 0.931 and 0.923 (P< 0.001), respectively, and the criteria for resistance/ susceptibility were 12/28 mm for 2CLR and 23/39 mm for 15CLR. For 2AMX and 10AMX, the R2 between MIC and DDZ were 0.478 and 0.421 (P< 0.001), respectively, and the criteria for resistance with breakpoint of 2μg/mL were 21 mm for 2AMX and 32 mm for 10AMX. All isolates had DDZ<60 mm with 2CLR and 2AMX, but 61.4% and 75.7% of the isolates had DDZ<60 mm with 15CLR and 10AMX, respectively. Conclusion: Excellent correlation and agreement between MIC and DDZ were found for clarithromycin and amoxicillin. With 2μg disks, the susceptibility breakpoints were 28 mm or less; thus, two disks could be tested in one plate.
참고문헌 (28)
- NIH consensus conference, "Helicobacter pylori in peptic ulcer disease. NIH consensus development panel on Helicobacter pylori in peptic ulcer disease", JAMA, 272, pp.65~69 (1994)
- Blaser MJ, "Hypothesis: the changing relationships of Helicobacter pylori and humans: implications for health and disease", J Infect Dis, 179, pp.1523~1530 (1999)
- 김재규, "Helicobacter pylori 감염 치료", 대한소화기학회지, 46(3), pp.172~180 (2005), 대한소화기학회
- 성흥섭, "Helicobacter pylori 항균제 감수성 검사의 임상적 유용성", The Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine, 26(3), pp.179~184 (2006), 대한진단검사의학회
- Malfertheiner P, "Current concepts in the management of Helicobacter pylori infection-the Maastricht 2-2000 Consensus Report", Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 16, pp.167~180 (2002)
- Eun CS, "Changing pattern of antimicrobial resistance of Helicobacter pylori in Korean patients with peptic ulcer diseases", J Gastroenterol, 38, pp.436~441 (2003)
- 방소영, "소화성 궤양 환자에서 Helicobacter pylori 항생제 내성률 변화", 대한소화기학회지, 50(6), pp.356~362 (2007), 대한소화기학회
- 김정목, "한국인 환자에서 분리한 Helicobacter pylori 균주의 항생제 내성률", 대한소화기학회지, 47(5), pp.337~349 (2006), 대한소화기학회
- Kim JM, "Comparison of primary and secondary antimicrobial minimum inhibitory concentrations for Helicobacter pylori isolated from Korean patients", Int J Antimicrob Agents, 28, pp.6~13 (2006)
- Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Ninth informational supplement, "National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards", NCCLS, ~, pp.M100-S9
- Mégraud F, "Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Helicobacter pylori in a large multicenter trial: the MACH 2 study", Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 43, pp.2747~2752 (1999)
- 강정옥, "실용적인 Helicobacter pylori 항균제감수성검사법의 확립을 위한 네 가지 검사법의 비교", 대한임상미생물학회지, 8(1), pp.82~89 (2005), 대한임상미생물학회
- Lang L, "Comparison of E-test and disk diffusion assay to evaluate resistance of Helicobacter pylori isolates to amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole and tetracycline in Costa Rica", Int J Antimicrob Agents, 24, pp.572~577 (2004)
- Hachem CY, "Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Helicobacter pylori. Comparison of E-test, broth microdilution, and disk diffusion for ampicillin, clarithromycin, and metronidazole", Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 24, pp.37~41 (1996)
- Boyanova L, "The status of antimicrobial resistance of Helicobacter pylori in eastern Europe", Clin Microbiol Infect, 8, pp.388~396 (2002)
- Mishra KK, "Antibiotic susceptibility of Helicobacter pylori clinical isolates: comparative evaluation of disk-diffusion and E-test methods", Curr Microbiol, 53, pp.329~334 (2006)
- Metzler CM, "Susceptibility tests of anaerobic bacteria: statistical and clinical considerations", J Infect Dis, 130, pp.588~594 (1974)
- Iovene MR, "Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in eighty clinical isolates of Helicobacter pylori", Chemotherapy, 45, pp.8~14 (1999)
- Weiss K, "Comparison of activity of 10 antibiotics against clinical strains of Helicobacter pylori by three different techniques", Can J Gastroenterol, 12, pp.181~185 (1998)
- Midolo PD, "Antimicrobial resistance testing of Helicobacter pylori: a comparison of Etest and disk diffusion methods", Pathology, 29, pp.411~414 (1997)
- Smith C, "Comparison of Etest and disc diffusion for detection of antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori", PHLS Microbiol Dig, 14, pp.21~23 (1997)
- Grignon B, "Validation of diffusion methods for macrolide susceptibility testing of Helicobacter pylori", Microb Drug Resist, 8, pp.61~66 (2002)
- McNulty C, "Helicobacter pylori susceptibility testing by disc diffusion", J Antimicrob Chemother, 49, pp.601~609 (2002)
- Development of in vitro susceptibility testing criteria and quality control parameters, "Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute", CLSI, ~, pp.M23-A3 (2008)
- Kim JM, "Distribution of antibiotic MICs for Helicobacter pylori strains over a 16-year period in patients from Seoul, South Korea", Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 48, pp.4843~4847 (2004)
- Franzin L, "Clarithromycin and amoxicillin susceptibility of Helicobacter pylori strains isolated from adult patients with gastric or duodenal ulcer in Italy", Curr Microbiol, 40, pp.96~100 (2000)
- Kim JJ, "Analysis of metronidazole, clarithromycin and tetracycline resistance of Helicobacter pylori isolates from Korea", J Antimicrob Chemother, 47, pp.459~461 (2001)
- Alarcón T, "Antibiotic resistance problems with Helicobacter pylori", Int J Antimicrob Agents, 12, pp.19~26 (1999)
