인공와우를 통한 말지각과 반대편 귀 사용 효과에 대한 최근 연구 고찰
Speech Perception and Benefits from the Contralateral Device of Cochlear Implant Users: A Review of Recent Literature
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The goal of cochlear implants restores functional hearing by transmitting electrical pulses to auditory nerves and improves speech perception. Although current cochlear implant users showed greatly improved sentence recognition scores in a quiet environment, the issues of understanding speech in a noisy environment and listening to music are still challenging for them. Limitations of spectral and temporal resolution are thought to be related to these difficulties of cochlear implant users. As one of the approaches to resolve these challenging issues, benefits from the contralateral device of cochlear implant users were introduced. Two different types of binaural placements, bilateral and bimodal hearing, were continuously increased and they demonstrated some amounts of speech perception benefits. Bilateral hearing improves sound localization and speech perception in noise mostly due to the benefits from head shadow and redundancy effects. On the other hand, bimodal benefits are delivered by using acoustic low frequency information which is not represented in electric stimulation via cochlear implants. A review of the literature related to these topics was addressed.
Abstract
The goal of cochlear implants restores functional hearing by transmitting electrical pulses to auditory nerves and improves speech perception. Although current cochlear implant users showed greatly improved sentence recognition scores in a quiet environment, the issues of understanding speech in a noisy environment and listening to music are still challenging for them. Limitations of spectral and temporal resolution are thought to be related to these difficulties of cochlear implant users. As one of the approaches to resolve these challenging issues, benefits from the contralateral device of cochlear implant users were introduced. Two different types of binaural placements, bilateral and bimodal hearing, were continuously increased and they demonstrated some amounts of speech perception benefits. Bilateral hearing improves sound localization and speech perception in noise mostly due to the benefits from head shadow and redundancy effects. On the other hand, bimodal benefits are delivered by using acoustic low frequency information which is not represented in electric stimulation via cochlear implants. A review of the literature related to these topics was addressed.
참고문헌 (37)
- Burns, E. M., "Played-again SAM; Further observations on the pitch of amplitude -modulated noise", Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 70, pp.1655~1660 (1981)
- Carroll, J., "Fundamental frequency is critical to speech perception in noise in combined acoustic and electric hearing", Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130(4), pp.2054~2062 (2011)
- Ching, T. Y., "Binaural-bimodal fitting or bilateral implantation for managing severe to profound deafness: A review", Trends in Amplification, 11(3), pp.161~192 (2007)
- Donaldson, G. S., "BKB-SIN and ANL predict perceived communication ability in cochlear implant users", Ear and Hearing, 30, pp.401~410 (2009)
- Donaldson, G. S., "Within-subjects comparison of the HiRes and Fidelity120 speech processing strategies: Speech perception and its relation to place-pitch sensitivity", Ear and Hearing, 32(2), pp.238~250 (2011)
- Dorman, M. F., "The benefits of combining acoustic and electric stimulation for the recognition of speech, voice and melodies", Audiology and Neurotology, 13(2), pp.105~112 (2008)
- Dorman, M. F., "Combining acoustic and electric stimulation in the service of speech recognition", International Journal of Audiology, 49(12), pp.912~919 (2010)
- Dunn, C. C., "Benefit of wearing a hearing aid on the unimplanted ear in adult users of a cochlear implant", Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48(3), pp.668~680 (2005)
- Firszt, J. B., "Restoring hearing symmetry with two cochlear implants or one cochlear implant and a contralateral hearing aid", Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 45(5), pp.749~767 (2008)
- Fitzpatrick, E. M., "Users’ experience of a cochlear implant combined with a hearing aid", International Journal of Audiology, 48(4), pp.172~182 (2009)
- Friesen, L. M., "Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: Comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants", Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110, pp.1150~1163 (2001)
- Gfeller, K. E., "Music perception with cochlear implants and residual hearing", Audiology and Neurotology, 11(Suppl 1), pp.12~15 (2006)
- Gfeller, K., "Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients on pitch perception, melody recognition, and speech reception in noise", Ear and Hearing, 28(3), pp.412~423 (2007)
- Gifford, R. H., "Speech recognition materials and ceiling effects: Considerations for cochlear implant programs", Audiology and Neurotology, 13(3), pp.193~205 (2008)
- Gifford, R. H., "Evidence for the expansion of adult cochlear implant candidacy", Ear and Hearing, 31(2), pp.186~194 (2010)
- Gorden, K. A., "Benefits of short interimplant delays in children receiving bilateral cochlear implants", Otology and Neurotology, 30(3), pp.319~331 (2009)
- Green, T., "Spectral and temporal cues to pitch in noise-excited vocoder simulations of continuous-interleaved-sampling cochlear implants", Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112, pp.2155~2164 (2002)
- Kong, Y. Y., "Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing", Ear and Hearing, 25(2), pp.173~185 (2004)
- Kong, Y. Y., "Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing", Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117(3 Pt 1), pp.1351~1361 (2005)
- Kong, Y. Y., "Temporal pitch perception at high rates in cochlear implants", Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 127(5), pp.3114~3123 (2010)
- Kong, Y. Y., "Cross-frequency integration for consonant and vowel identification in bimodal hearing", Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54(3), pp.959~980 (2011)
- Li, N., "A glimpsing account for the benefit of simulated combined acoustic and electric hearing", Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123(4), pp.2287~2294 (2008)
- McDermott, H., "Benefits of combined acoustic and electric hearing for music and pitch perception", Seminars in Hearing, 32(1), pp.103~114 (2011)
- Mok, M., "Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears", Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49(2), pp.338~351 (2006)
- Moore, B. C., "Coding of sounds in the auditory system and its relevance to signal processing and coding in cochlear implants", Otology and Neurotology, 24(2), pp.243~254 (2003)
- Muller, J., "Clinical trial results with the MED-EL fine structure processing coding strategy in experienced cochlear implant users", ORL; Journal for Oto-rhin-laryngology and Its Related Specialties, 74(4), pp.185~198 (2012)
- Rosen, S., "Temporal information in speech: acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects", Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 336(1278), pp.367~373 (1992)
- Shannon, R. V., "Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues", Science, 270(5234), pp.303~304 (1995)
- Smith, Z. M., "Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception", Nature, 416(6876), pp.87~90 (2002)
- Spahr, A. J., "Performance of patients using different cochlear implant systems: Effects of input dynamic range", Ear and Hearing, 28(2), pp.260~275 (2007)
- Srinivasan, A. G., "Current focusing sharpens local peaks of excitation in cochlear implant stimulation", Hearing Research, 270(1-2), pp.89~100 (2010)
- Turner, C. W., "Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: Benefits of residual acoustic hearing", Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115(4), pp.1729~1735 (2004)
- Yoon, Y. S., "Clinical selection criteria for a second cochlear implant for bimodal listeners", Otology and Neurotology, 33(7), pp.1161~1168 (2012)
- Wilson, B. S., "Two new directions in speech processor design for cochlear implants", Ear and Hearing, 26(Suppl 4), pp.73S~81S (2005)
- Wilson, B. S., "Cochlear implants: A remarkable past and brilliant future", Hearing Research, 242(1-2), pp.3~21 (2008)
- von Ilberg, C. A., "Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: A review of the first decade", Audiology and Neurotology, 16(Suppl 2), pp.1~30 (2011)
- Zhang, T., "Information from the voice fundamental frequency (F0) region accounts for the majority of the benefit when acoustic stimulation is added to electric stimulation", Ear and Hearing, 31(1), pp.63~69 (2010)