본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Use of Sentence Context and Speech Perception in Noise for Children Who Were Suspected for Auditory Processing Disorder

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Purpose: Atypical difficulty perceiving speech in noise is one of the behavioral symptoms frequently reported for auditory processing disorder (APD). However, currently there is no consensus regarding the underlying mechanisms for this deficit. Motivated by a view that this is a cumulative result of acoustic-phonetic processing failures, the present study examined the effect of increasing linguistic complexity on speech perception in noise by children who failed audiologic screening for APD. Methods: Listeners were 84 7-to-12 yearold English-speaking children with normal hearing. Nine children failed audiologic APD screening and were referred for further testing (children with referral); 75 were typically-developing peers. Using an adaptive procedure, signal-to-noise ratios required for 70%-correct recognition of words and sentences (SNR70) were obtained for each listener to quantify additional deficit due to sentence context when listening to speech in noise. Results: Despite reported deficits in noise, and contrary to our prediction, no group difference in SNR70 was observed between children with referral and their typically-developing peers. Analysis for individual differences showed that SNR70 for only one child with referral was outside the bounds established for the typically-developing children. Conclusion: Our results did not reflect the reported atypically compromised speech perception in noise by children with referral when compared to their typicallydeveloping peers, implying that these difficulties stem neither from the deficit in acoustic-phonetic processing nor the deficit in the use of sentence context. The present results also suggest that speech perception in noise deficit in APD require more complex speech materials and/or acoustic environments.

Abstract

Purpose: Atypical difficulty perceiving speech in noise is one of the behavioral symptoms frequently reported for auditory processing disorder (APD). However, currently there is no consensus regarding the underlying mechanisms for this deficit. Motivated by a view that this is a cumulative result of acoustic-phonetic processing failures, the present study examined the effect of increasing linguistic complexity on speech perception in noise by children who failed audiologic screening for APD. Methods: Listeners were 84 7-to-12 yearold English-speaking children with normal hearing. Nine children failed audiologic APD screening and were referred for further testing (children with referral); 75 were typically-developing peers. Using an adaptive procedure, signal-to-noise ratios required for 70%-correct recognition of words and sentences (SNR70) were obtained for each listener to quantify additional deficit due to sentence context when listening to speech in noise. Results: Despite reported deficits in noise, and contrary to our prediction, no group difference in SNR70 was observed between children with referral and their typically-developing peers. Analysis for individual differences showed that SNR70 for only one child with referral was outside the bounds established for the typically-developing children. Conclusion: Our results did not reflect the reported atypically compromised speech perception in noise by children with referral when compared to their typicallydeveloping peers, implying that these difficulties stem neither from the deficit in acoustic-phonetic processing nor the deficit in the use of sentence context. The present results also suggest that speech perception in noise deficit in APD require more complex speech materials and/or acoustic environments.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. Ahmmed, A. U., "Assessment of children with suspected auditory processing disorder : A factor analysis study", Ear and Hearing, 35(3), pp.295~305 (2014)
  2. Allen, P., "Auditory processing disorders : Relationship to cognitive processes and underlying auditory neural integrity", International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 78(2), pp.198~208 (2014)
  3. "Diagnosis, Treatment and Management of Children and Adults with Central Auditory Processing Disorder" (2010)[URL]
  4. American National Standards Institute (ANSI), "Methods for calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index. ANSI", ASA S3.5-1997 (R2017), 1997
  5. "Children’s Home Inventory for Listening Difficulties: CHILD" (2000)[URL]
  6. Bankson, N. W., "Quick Screen of Phonology" (1990), Special Press
  7. Hearing Tests and the Spoken Language of Hearing-Impaired Children, "Speech", pp.1979, Bench, R. J.
  8. Bishop, D. V. M., "Auditory temporal processing impairment: Neither necessary nor sufficient for causing language impairment in children", Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42(6), pp.1295~1310 (1999)
  9. Brenneman, L., "The relationship between central auditory processing, language, and cognition in children being evaluated for central auditory processing disorder", Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 28(8), pp.758~769 (2017)
  10. "Position Statement and Practice Guidance. Auditory Processing Disorder (APD)" (2018)[URL]
  11. Cacace, A. T., "The importance of modality specificity in diagnosing central auditory processing disorder", American Journal of Audiology, 14(2), pp.112~123 (2005)
  12. Cameron, S., "Results from a national central auditory processing disorder service: A realworld assessment of diagnostic practices and remediation for central auditory processing disorder", Seminars in Hearing, 36(4), pp.216~236 (2015)
  13. Carrow-Woolfolk, E., "Oral and Written Language Scales" (1996), Pearson
  14. Carrow-Woolfolk, E., "Comprehensive Assessment of Spoken Language (CASLTM)" (1999), Pearson
  15. Dawes, P., "Temporal auditory and visual motion processing of children diagnosed with auditory processing disorder and dyslexia", Ear and Hearing, 30(6), pp.675~686 (2009)
  16. Dunn, L. M., "Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, Fourth Edition (PPVTTM-4)" (2007), NCS Pearson, Inc
  17. Fey, M. E., "Auditory processing disorder and auditory", language interventions:An evidence-based systematic review, 2011, pp.42(3), 246~264
  18. Fortunato-Tavares, T., "Linguistic and auditory temporal processing in children with specific language impairment", Pró-Fono Revista de Atualização Científica, 21(4), pp.279~284 (2009)
  19. Haskins, H. A., "A phonetically balanced test of speech discrimination for children", master’s, pp.1949
  20. "Central Auditory Processing Disorders–Symptoms" (2017)[URL]
  21. Keith, R. W., "Auditory Continuous Performance Test (ACPT)" (1994), Psychological Co
  22. Keith, R. W., "SCAN-C: Test for Auditory Processing Disorders in Children-Revised" (2000), Pearson
  23. Klecka, W. R., "Discriminant Analysis" (1980), SAGE Publications, Inc
  24. Lagacé, J., "Auditory processing disorder and speech perception problems in noise : Finding the underlying origin", American Journal of Audiology, 19(1), pp.17~25 (2010)
  25. Leibold, L. J., "Children’s identification of consonants in a speech-shaped noise or a two-talker masker", Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56(4), pp.1144~1155 (2013)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)