본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Literature Review of Bimodal Fitting

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Although there are quite a few bimodal cochlear implant users, bimodal fitting guidelines were not fully developed. Bimodal fitting optimization is one of the factors that contribute to successful bimodal outcomes. The purpose of this study is to investigate recent literatures related to bimodal fitting to establish evidence based bimodal fitting guidelines. Three databases including Google Scholar, PubMed publisher, and PLOS One were searched to review bimodal fitting literatures. A total of 599,604 articles were identified by using ten bimodal relevant keywords at the initial stage. Then, we included 192 articles with abstract review, inclusion and exclusion criteria and removals of duplicates. Lastly, two authors reviewed full texts and identified a total of 19 bimodal fitting articles. Results were categorized into type of bimodal intervention, procedures, and outcomes. Bimodal fitting procedures, test materials, and questionnaires were also summarized. A total of 18 articles consist of bimodal hearing aid fitting covering hearing aid fitting formula, gain adjustment, loudness balance, frequency band, frequency lowering technology, and overall bimodal fitting guidelines. Only one article includes bimodal cochlear implant fitting with low frequency band adjustment. Several factors including real-ear measurement, loudness balance test, frequency band selection considering cochlear dead region, and subjective questionnaires are considered to optimize bimodal hearing aid fitting. Bimodal fitting guidelines considering several relevant factors will optimize bimodal fitting and improve bimodal benefits.

Abstract

Although there are quite a few bimodal cochlear implant users, bimodal fitting guidelines were not fully developed. Bimodal fitting optimization is one of the factors that contribute to successful bimodal outcomes. The purpose of this study is to investigate recent literatures related to bimodal fitting to establish evidence based bimodal fitting guidelines. Three databases including Google Scholar, PubMed publisher, and PLOS One were searched to review bimodal fitting literatures. A total of 599,604 articles were identified by using ten bimodal relevant keywords at the initial stage. Then, we included 192 articles with abstract review, inclusion and exclusion criteria and removals of duplicates. Lastly, two authors reviewed full texts and identified a total of 19 bimodal fitting articles. Results were categorized into type of bimodal intervention, procedures, and outcomes. Bimodal fitting procedures, test materials, and questionnaires were also summarized. A total of 18 articles consist of bimodal hearing aid fitting covering hearing aid fitting formula, gain adjustment, loudness balance, frequency band, frequency lowering technology, and overall bimodal fitting guidelines. Only one article includes bimodal cochlear implant fitting with low frequency band adjustment. Several factors including real-ear measurement, loudness balance test, frequency band selection considering cochlear dead region, and subjective questionnaires are considered to optimize bimodal hearing aid fitting. Bimodal fitting guidelines considering several relevant factors will optimize bimodal fitting and improve bimodal benefits.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. "Bimodal Fitting Quick Guide" (2014)[URL]
  2. Ching, T. Y. C., "Binaural benefits for adults who use hearing aids and cochlear implants in opposite ears", Ear and Hearing, 25(1), pp.9~21 (2004)
  3. "Bimodal Hearing: A Guide to Fitting" (2012)[URL]
  4. Cuda, D., "Effectiveness and efficiency of a dedicated bimodal fitting formula", Audiology Research, 9(1), pp.219~ (2019)
  5. Davidson, L. S., "Evaluation of hearing aid frequency response fittings in pediatric and young adult bimodal recipients", Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 26(4), pp.393~407 (2015)
  6. Dorman, M. F., "The benefits of combining acoustic and electric stimulation for the recognition of speech, voice and melodies", Audiology and Neurotology, 13(2), pp.105~112 (2008)
  7. English, R., "Fitting recommendations and clinical benefit associated with use of the NAL-NL2hearing-aid prescription in Nucleus cochlear implant recipients", International Journal of Audiology, 55(Suppl 2), pp.S45~S50 (2016)
  8. Fowler, J. R., "Effects of removing low-frequency electric information on speech perception with bimodal hearing", Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 59(1), pp.99~109 (2016)
  9. Gatehouse, S., "The speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale(SSQ)", International Journal of Audiology, 43(2), pp.85~99 (2004)
  10. Gfeller, K., "The effects of musical and linguistic components in recognition of real-world musical excerpts by cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults", Journal of Music Therapy, 49(1), pp.68~101 (2012)
  11. Gifford, R. H., "Bimodal hearing: How to optimize bimodal fitting", The Hearing Journal, 72(2), pp.10~13 (2019)
  12. Gifford, R. H., "Evidence for the expansion of adult cochlear implant candidacy", Ear and Hearing, 31(2), pp.186~194 (2010)
  13. Harris, M. S., "An analysis of hearing aid fittings in adults using cochlear implants and contralateral hearing aids", The Laryngoscope, 120(12), pp.2484~2488 (2010)
  14. Hua, H., "Cochlear implant combined with a linear frequency transposing hearing aid", Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 23(9), pp.722~732 (2012)
  15. Keilmann, A. M., "Cochlear implant and hearing aid : A new approach to optimizing the fitting in this bimodal situation", European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 266(12), pp.1879~1884 (2009)
  16. Kong, Y. Y., "Improved speech recognition in noise in simulated binaurally combined acoustic and electric stimulation", The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121(6), pp.3717~3727 (2007)
  17. Kong, Y. Y., "Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing", Ear and Hearing, 25(2), pp.173~185 (2004)
  18. McDermott, H., "Benefits of combined acoustic and electric hearing for music and pitch perception", Seminars in Hearing, 32(1), pp.103~114 (2011)
  19. McDermott, H., "The use of frequency compression by cochlear implant recipients with postoperative acoustic hearing", Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 21(6), pp.380~389 (2010)
  20. Messersmith, J. J., "Reduction in highfrequency hearing aid gain can improve performance in patients with contralateral cochlear implant : A pilot study", American Journal of Audiology, 24(4), pp.462~468 (2015)
  21. Moher, D., "Preferred reporting items for systematic review and metaanalysis protocols(PRISMA-P)2015 statement", Systematic Reviews, 4(1), pp.1~ (2015)
  22. Müller, J., "Clinical trial results with the MED-EL fine structure processing coding strategy in experienced cochlear implant users", ORL; Journal for Oto-rhino-laryngology and its Related Specialties, 74(4), pp.185~198 (2012)
  23. Neuman, A. C., "Effect of hearing aid bandwidth on speech recognition performance of listeners using a cochlear implant and contralateral hearing aid(bimodal hearing)", Ear and Hearing, 34(5), pp.553~561 (2013)
  24. Neuman, A. C., "The effect of hearing aid bandwidth and configuration of hearing loss on bimodal speech recognition in cochlear implant users", Ear and Hearing, 40(3), pp.621~635 (2019)
  25. "Bimodal Hearing Aid Fitting Guidelines" (2016)[URL]
  26. Park, L. R., "Effects of frequency compression hearing aids for unilaterally implanted children with acoustically amplified residual hearing in the nonimplanted ear", Ear and Hearing, 33(4), pp.e1~e12 (2012)
  27. Perreau, A. E., "The contribution of a frequency-compression hearing aid to contralateral cochlear implant performance", Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 24(2), pp.105~120 (2013)
  28. Shannon, R. V., "Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues", Science, 270(5234), pp.303~304 (1995)
  29. Siburt, H. W., "Bimodal programming : A survey of current clinical practice", American Journal of Audiology, 24(2), pp.243~249 (2015)
  30. Spahr, A. J., "Development and validation of the AzBio sentence lists", Ear and Hearing, 33(1), pp.112~117 (2012)
  31. UK Cochlear Implant Study Group, "Criteria of candidacy for unilateral cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults II : Costeffectiveness analysis", Ear and Hearing, 25(4), pp.336~360 (2004)
  32. Ullauri, A., "Bimodal benefits of cochlear implant and hearing aid(on the non-implanted ear) : A pilot study to develop a protocol and a test battery", Cochlear Implants International, 8(1), pp.29~37 (2007)
  33. Veugen, L. C. E., "Frequency-dependent loudness balancing in bimodal cochlear implant users", Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 136(8), pp.775~781 (2016)
  34. Veugen, L. C. E., "Matching automatic gain control across devices in bimodal cochlear implant users", Ear and Hearing, 37(3), pp.260~270 (2016)
  35. Vroegop, J. L., "How to optimally fit a hearing aid for bimodal cochlear implant users : A systematic review", Ear and Hearing, 39(6), pp.1039~1045 (2018)
  36. Vroegop, J. L., "Comparing two hearing aid fitting algorithms for bimodal cochlear implant users", Ear and Hearing, 40(1), pp.98~106 (2019)
  37. Yehudai, N., "Functional status of hearing aids in bilateral-bimodal users", Otology and Neurotology, 34(4), pp.675~681 (2013)
  38. Zhang, T., "Cochlear dead regions constrain the benefit of combining acoustic stimulation with electric stimulation", Ear and Hearing, 35(4), pp.410~417 (2014)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)