본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Distributional Effects of Taxes and Benefits in Korea

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류정책학

초록

A simulation model has been developed in Korea, named Korea Institue of Publc Finance Simulation Model (KIPFSIM), which aims to estimate the effects of taxes and transfers in Korea. The current version of KIPFSIM adopts a static approach combined with a zero-elasticity assumption that there will be no change in labor supply and consumption decisions even after changes in taxes and transfers. KIPFSIM uses a representative sample from the Household Income and Expenditure Survey, compiled and released by the Statistical Office of Korea. Using KIPFSIM, we investigated the distributional effects of the proposed income tax cut, with hypothetical changes in taxes and transfers, which is set to be enacted in 2009 and 2010. We found that the benefit of the income tax cut is concentrated mostly on high-income taxpayers in terms of absolute value, but more on middle-income taxpayers in terms of percentage of the tax burden. Therefore, the new income tax law is considered to strengthen the progressive nature of the tax code and to lower tax burdens and tax revenue. We also found that after-income-tax income inequality, as measured by Gini coefficient, was slightly worsened, primarily due to the decrease in income tax revenue, which helps equalize income distribution.

Abstract

A simulation model has been developed in Korea, named Korea Institue of Publc Finance Simulation Model (KIPFSIM), which aims to estimate the effects of taxes and transfers in Korea. The current version of KIPFSIM adopts a static approach combined with a zero-elasticity assumption that there will be no change in labor supply and consumption decisions even after changes in taxes and transfers. KIPFSIM uses a representative sample from the Household Income and Expenditure Survey, compiled and released by the Statistical Office of Korea. Using KIPFSIM, we investigated the distributional effects of the proposed income tax cut, with hypothetical changes in taxes and transfers, which is set to be enacted in 2009 and 2010. We found that the benefit of the income tax cut is concentrated mostly on high-income taxpayers in terms of absolute value, but more on middle-income taxpayers in terms of percentage of the tax burden. Therefore, the new income tax law is considered to strengthen the progressive nature of the tax code and to lower tax burdens and tax revenue. We also found that after-income-tax income inequality, as measured by Gini coefficient, was slightly worsened, primarily due to the decrease in income tax revenue, which helps equalize income distribution.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. "Overview of the Congressional Budget Office Long-Term (CBOLT) policy simulation model"[URL]
  2. "The effect of tax changes on labor supply in CBO’s microsimulation tax model"[URL]
  3. Centre for Strategic Analysis, "ITS. Indirect taxation in France: Measurement of behavioural and redistributive effects of using a new microsimulation mode", ~ (2006)
  4. ESRI, "SWITCH. Examination of budget 2006—income tax measures using the national anti-poverty strategy guidelines", A distributional analysis of council tax revaluation, ~ (2006)
  5. IFS, "TAXBEN. Taxben: The IFS microsimulation tax and benefit model", ~ (1995)
  6. Juvenile Justice System, "A microsimulation model of the juvenile justice system in Queensland", ~ (2006)
  7. Kings College London, "LSE", ESRC. SAGEMOD. A computing strategy for SAGE: 2, 2003
  8. Ministry of Finance.SESIM, "SESIM III-A Swedish dynamic microsimulation model", ~ (2005)
  9. NBER, "Estimating federal income tax burdens for panel study of income dynamics (PSID) families using the National Bureau of Economic Research TAXSIM model", ~ (1997)
  10. OECD, "EUROMOD. EUROMOD: An integrated European benefit-tax model", ~ (2001)
  11. Policy Simulation Group, "HISIM. A tool for analyzing state market-oriented reforms: The health insurance market simulation model", ~ (1995)
  12. Policy Simulation Group, "Getting started with the PSG models", ~ (2008)
  13. "GEMINI. GEMINI Guide"[URL]
  14. Policy Simulation Group, "PENSIM", PENSIM Overview, ~ (2008)
  15. Policy Simulation Group, "SSASIM", SSASIM Guide, ~ (2008)
  16. POLIMOD, "Tackling child poverty in London: Implications of demographic and economic change", ~ (2007)
  17. Statistics Norway, "MOSART", Projections of population, education, labour supply and public pension benefits, ~ (1998)
  18. Revenue forecast for labor income tax using microsimulation model, "Sung,M.J", Korea Institute of Public Finance, ~, pp.Research report 97-05 (1997)
  19. Sung, M. J., "Gini coefficients of urban households: Comparison between beforeand after-adjusting seasonality and selection bias", Review of Fiscal Studies, 9(1) (2002), Korea Institute of Public Finance
  20. Suggestions for income tax revision, "Sung, M. J", Korea Institute of Public Finance, ~, pp.Research report 98-02 (1998)
  21. 성명재, "조세·재정지출의 소득재분배 효과: 소비세 및 현물급여 포함", 재정학연구, 1(1), pp.63~94 (2008), 한국재정학회
  22. Treasury, "TAXMOD", Reweighting the New Zealand household economic survey for tax microsimulation modelling, ~ (2003)
  23. University of California-Berkeley, "SOCSIM", Testing the validity of kinship microsimulation: An update, ~ (1998)
  24. "STINMOD. Use of static microsimulation models in the policy process in Australia"[URL]
  25. University of California-Berkeley., "CAREMOD", Development of CareMod, 2006
  26. University of Canberra, "NATSEM", APPSIM. APPSIM: The Australian dynamic population and policy microsimulation model, ~ (2007)
  27. "MITTS"[URL]
  28. University of Nottingham, "Economic incentives and tax hypothecation. University of Umea", The SVERIGE Spatial Microsimulation Model, ~ (1998)
  29. University of Washington, "URBANSIM", The open platform for urban simulation and UrbanSim version 4, ~ (2008)
  30. Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, "The Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center microsimulation model: Documentation and methodology for version 0304", ~ (2005)
  31. Urban Institute, "Long term model development for social security policy analysis", ~ (2000)
  32. Urban Institute, "MINT. Modeling income in the near term: Revised projections of retirement income through 2020 for the 1931-1960 birth cohorts", ~ (2002)
  33. Modeling income in the near term: Revise, "HIRSM. The health insurance reform simulation model (HIRSM)", ~ (2003)
  34. Urban Institute, "DYNASIM3. A primer on the dynamic simulation of income model", ~ (2004)
  35. Urban Institute, "TRIM3. Estimating the anti-poverty effects of changes in taxes and benefits with the TRIM3 Microsimulation Models", ~ (2007)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)