상황별 말더듬 자기평가 도구의 타당도 및 신뢰도
The Validity and Reliability of the Self Scaling on Stuttering Situations
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The study was to verify the validity and reliability of the Self Scaling on Stuttering Situations (SOS). Methods: Participants included 20 adults who stutter (AWS) and 20 adults who don’t stutter (AWNS). They completed the SOS and the Subjective screening of stuttering severity, locus of control and avoidance, Revised edition (SSS-R). The validity (i.e., content, construct, and concurrent validities), the internal consistency reliability (i.e., Cronbach’s alpha and test-retest reliability), and the item discrimination tests were measured. Results: The SOS showed high validity and reliability as follows, 1) the mean content validity of the SOS was 4.43 (SD = 0.28), 2) the correlation coefficients between the total score and the scores of the three sections (construct validity) were 0.672-0.925, 3) the correlation coefficients between the SOS and the SSS-R (concurrent validity) were 0.665-0.825 except the frequency of the SOS, 4) the Cronbach’s alpha values of the three sections were 0.905-0.965, 5) the test-retest reliability values using the Pearson correlation analysis were 0.821-0.958, 6) the item discrimination to test between AWS and AWNS indicates that no significant difference was found in the frequency of occurrence, however significant differences were found in the 14 items of the Avoidance and 23 items of the stuttering severity. Conclusion: The results showed that the SOS could be a valid and reliable instrument to evaluate AWS more comprehensively on 23 situations. SOS may be used as a tool to establish treatment goals of fluency disorders in various situations.
Abstract
Purpose: The study was to verify the validity and reliability of the Self Scaling on Stuttering Situations (SOS). Methods: Participants included 20 adults who stutter (AWS) and 20 adults who don’t stutter (AWNS). They completed the SOS and the Subjective screening of stuttering severity, locus of control and avoidance, Revised edition (SSS-R). The validity (i.e., content, construct, and concurrent validities), the internal consistency reliability (i.e., Cronbach’s alpha and test-retest reliability), and the item discrimination tests were measured. Results: The SOS showed high validity and reliability as follows, 1) the mean content validity of the SOS was 4.43 (SD = 0.28), 2) the correlation coefficients between the total score and the scores of the three sections (construct validity) were 0.672-0.925, 3) the correlation coefficients between the SOS and the SSS-R (concurrent validity) were 0.665-0.825 except the frequency of the SOS, 4) the Cronbach’s alpha values of the three sections were 0.905-0.965, 5) the test-retest reliability values using the Pearson correlation analysis were 0.821-0.958, 6) the item discrimination to test between AWS and AWNS indicates that no significant difference was found in the frequency of occurrence, however significant differences were found in the 14 items of the Avoidance and 23 items of the stuttering severity. Conclusion: The results showed that the SOS could be a valid and reliable instrument to evaluate AWS more comprehensively on 23 situations. SOS may be used as a tool to establish treatment goals of fluency disorders in various situations.
참고문헌 (23)
- Bloodstein, O., "A Handbook on Stuttering" (2008), Delmar
- Darley, F., "Diagnostic Methods in Speech Pathology" (1978), Harper & Row
- Jeong, K. S., "The influence of respondents’ reaction on the disfluency of adults who stutter in telephone speaking situations", master, pp.2015
- 김효정, "한국말더듬지각검사 개발 연구", 언어치료연구, 22(1), pp.191~205 (2013), 한국언어치료학회
- 김효정, "말하기 효능감 검사 개발을 위한 예비 연구", 언어치료연구, 21(2), pp.191~207 (2012), 한국언어치료학회
- 김효정, "말더듬 내면적 검사 간의 상관연구: 한국판 의사소통 태도 검사, 한국판 말더듬 지각 검사, 말하기 효능감 검사를 중심으로", 언어치료연구, 24(4), pp.45~56 (2015), 한국언어치료학회[DOI]
- 김재옥, "주관적 말더듬 선별검사의 국내적용 타당성 확보를 위한 기초연구", Communication Sciences and Disorders, 12(3), pp.465~486 (2007), 한국언어청각임상학회
- Kim, M. H., "Adults who stutter perceptions toward stuttering selfdisclosure", master, pp.2015
- 권도하, "말더듬인의 상황에 따른 말더듬 행동 발생 및 상관 연구", 언어치료연구, 17(2), pp.75~87 (2008), 한국언어치료학회
- Manning, W., "Clinical Decision Making in Fluency Disorders" (2010), Cengage Delmar Learning
- O’Brian, S., "Self-rating of stuttering severity as a clinical tool", American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13(3), pp.219~226 (2004)
- O’Brian, S., "Measurement of stuttering in adults: Comparison of stuttering-rate and severity-scaling methods", Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47(5), pp.1081~1087 (2004)
- Ornstein, A. F., "Self-efficacy scaling by adult stutterers", Journal of Communication Disorders, 18(4), pp.313~320 (1985)
- Prins, D., "Stuttering and Related Disorders of Fluency" (1993), Thieme Medical Publishers
- Riley, J., "Subjective screening of stuttering severity, locus of control and avoidance : Research edition", Journal of Fluency Disorders, 29(1), pp.51~62 (2004)
- Ryan, B. P., "Programmed Therapy for Stuttering in Children and Adults" (1974), Charles Thomas
- Ryan, B. P., "Programmed Therapy for Stuttering in Children and Adults" (2001), Charles Thomas
- Shin, M. J., "A case study of adults who stutter", Workshop on fluency disorders, pp.11~29 (2006), Korean Association of Speech-Language- Pathologists
- Sim, H. S., "Paradise-Fluency Assessment II" (2010), Paradise Welfare Foundation
- Sung, T. J., "Research Methodology" (2014), Hakjisa
- Van Riper, C., "The Nature of Stuttering" (1982), Prentice-Hall
- Yairi, E., "Stuttering: Foundations and Clinical Applications" (2011), Pearson
- Yaruss, J. S., "Clinical implications of situational variability in preschool children who stutter", Journal of Fluency Disorders, 22(3), pp.187~203 (1997)