Comparison of Blood Culture Parameters between 2 and 10 mL Aerobic Bottles from Patients with Sepsis
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: Blood volume is the most important parameter for an optimal blood culture;however, the effect of blood volume on blood culture is not clearly understood from patients withsepsis. Methods: Blood cultures were obtained from 1,049 patients (≥ 15 years old) who visited theemergency department (ED). Two sets of 20 mL each was collected from each patient, 12 mLof which was transferred to 2 and 10 mL FA Plus (aerobic) bottles (bioMérieux, USA) and theremaining into an FN Plus (anaerobic) bottle. Medical records were reviewed to confirm thediagnosis and clinical significance of the blood culture isolates. The positive rate and time-todetection(TTD) were compared between the 2 and 10 mL groups. Results: Among the 2,098 sets collected, 612 sets (29.2%) were excluded due to inadequate(either too much or too little) blood volume. The positive rate of clinically significant pathogenswas lower in the 2 mL group (6.1%) than in the 10 mL group (7.5%) (P = 0.003) among the 1,486sets. However, there was no significant difference in the positive rate (11.0% vs. 12.5%, P = 0.152)and TTD (15.7 hours vs. 14.2 hours, P = 0.299) among the 585 (39.4%) patients with sepsis. Conclusion: The positive rate and TTD were similar between the 2 and 10 mL groups frompatients with sepsis who visited the ED, suggesting a high concentration of bacteremia in thisgroup. Therefore, a smaller blood volume should be carefully considered in patients with sepsis inthe ED.
Abstract
Background: Blood volume is the most important parameter for an optimal blood culture;however, the effect of blood volume on blood culture is not clearly understood from patients withsepsis. Methods: Blood cultures were obtained from 1,049 patients (≥ 15 years old) who visited theemergency department (ED). Two sets of 20 mL each was collected from each patient, 12 mLof which was transferred to 2 and 10 mL FA Plus (aerobic) bottles (bioMérieux, USA) and theremaining into an FN Plus (anaerobic) bottle. Medical records were reviewed to confirm thediagnosis and clinical significance of the blood culture isolates. The positive rate and time-todetection(TTD) were compared between the 2 and 10 mL groups. Results: Among the 2,098 sets collected, 612 sets (29.2%) were excluded due to inadequate(either too much or too little) blood volume. The positive rate of clinically significant pathogenswas lower in the 2 mL group (6.1%) than in the 10 mL group (7.5%) (P = 0.003) among the 1,486sets. However, there was no significant difference in the positive rate (11.0% vs. 12.5%, P = 0.152)and TTD (15.7 hours vs. 14.2 hours, P = 0.299) among the 585 (39.4%) patients with sepsis. Conclusion: The positive rate and TTD were similar between the 2 and 10 mL groups frompatients with sepsis who visited the ED, suggesting a high concentration of bacteremia in thisgroup. Therefore, a smaller blood volume should be carefully considered in patients with sepsis inthe ED.
참고문헌 (16)
- Principles and procedures for blood cultures; approved guideline, "Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)", CLSI, ~, pp.CLSI document M47-A (2007)
- Lamy B, "How to optimize the use of blood cultures for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections? A state-of-the art", Front Microbiol, 7, pp.697~ (2016)
- Ilstrup DM, "The importance of volume of blood cultured in the detection of bacteremia and fungemia", Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 1, pp.107~110 (1983)
- Cockerill FR 3rd, "Optimal testing parameters for blood cultures", Clin Infect Dis, 38, pp.1724~1730 (2004)
- Kim SC, "Effect of blood volume in standard anaerobic blood culture bottles of the BacT", ALERT 3D system used for the detection of pathogens and time to detection, 2015, pp.10, e0116728~
- Tenney JH, "Controlled evaluation of the volume of blood cultured in detection of bacteremia and fungemia", J Clin Microbiol, 15, pp.558~561 (1982)
- Li J, "Effects of volume and periodicity on blood cultures", J Clin Microbiol, 32, pp.2829~2831 (1994)
- Weinstein MP, "Controlled evaluation of 5versus 10 milliliters of blood cultured in aerobic BacT", Alert blood culture bottles, 1994, pp.32, 2103~2106
- Shapiro NI, "Who needs a blood culture? A prospectively derived and validated prediction rule", J Emerg Med, 35, pp.255~264 (2008)
- Abe T, "Usefulness of initial blood cultures in patients admitted with pneumonia from an emergency department in Japan", J Infect Chemother, 15, pp.180~186 (2009)
- Mayr FB, "Epidemiology of severe sepsis", Virulence, 5, pp.4~11 (2014)
- Dellinger RP, "Surviving sepsis campaign : international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock : 2012", Intensive Care Med, 39, pp.165~228 (2013)
- Self WH, "Reducing blood culture contamination in the emergency department : an interrupted time series quality improvement study", Acad Emerg Med, 20, pp.89~97 (2013)
- Martin GS, "The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000", N Engl J Med, 348, pp.1546~1554 (2003)
- 신정환, "Comprehensive Analysis of Blood Culture Performed at Nine University Hospitals in Korea", Annals of Laboratory Medicine, 31(2), pp.101~106 (2011), 대한진단검사의학회
- Whittle J, "The new international sepsis guidelines(sepsis-3) : the central message remains", Br J Hosp Med, 77, pp.208~211 (2016)