Comparing the Arrangements of Governance and Sustainable Development in OECD Countries: Coupled or Decoupled?
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study attempts to analyze to what extent governance and sustainable development (SD) empirically appear compatible in the thirtyfive OECD countries through the fuzzy-set ideal type analysis, and identify which ideal types appear coupled or decoupled, and then reveal which countries belong to the coupled types or to the decoupled types. In short, twenty-two countries (including Sweden (fuzzy score, 0.953), Denmark (0.920), Finland (0.914), Norway (0.911) in Type 1 (G*S, ‘strong G-S coupled countries’); and Turkey (0.906), Greece (0.833), Mexico (0.828) in Type 4 (g*s, ‘lite g-s coupled countries’) are in line with the accepted conventions regarding the compatible relationship between governance and SD. On the other hand, the rest of thirteen countries (including USA (fuzzy score, 0.815), Luxembourg (0.721), Australia (0.660) in Type 2 (G*s, ‘G-s decoupled countries’); and Slovenia (0.728), France (0.644), Czech Rep. (0.625) in Type 3 (g*S, ‘g-S decoupled countries’) may indicate that the relationship of governance and SD is in fact experiencing tensions in the national contexts. These findings are characterized by the substance (of SD) and procedure (of governance) divide. Considering the results, this study focuses on the idea of reflexivity or reflexive capacity.
Abstract
This study attempts to analyze to what extent governance and sustainable development (SD) empirically appear compatible in the thirtyfive OECD countries through the fuzzy-set ideal type analysis, and identify which ideal types appear coupled or decoupled, and then reveal which countries belong to the coupled types or to the decoupled types. In short, twenty-two countries (including Sweden (fuzzy score, 0.953), Denmark (0.920), Finland (0.914), Norway (0.911) in Type 1 (G*S, ‘strong G-S coupled countries’); and Turkey (0.906), Greece (0.833), Mexico (0.828) in Type 4 (g*s, ‘lite g-s coupled countries’) are in line with the accepted conventions regarding the compatible relationship between governance and SD. On the other hand, the rest of thirteen countries (including USA (fuzzy score, 0.815), Luxembourg (0.721), Australia (0.660) in Type 2 (G*s, ‘G-s decoupled countries’); and Slovenia (0.728), France (0.644), Czech Rep. (0.625) in Type 3 (g*S, ‘g-S decoupled countries’) may indicate that the relationship of governance and SD is in fact experiencing tensions in the national contexts. These findings are characterized by the substance (of SD) and procedure (of governance) divide. Considering the results, this study focuses on the idea of reflexivity or reflexive capacity.
참고문헌 (61)
- Bambra, C, "The worlds of welfare: Illusory and gender blind", Social Policy and Society, 3(3), pp.201~211 (2004)
- Barnes, M, "Designing citizen-centred governance" (2008), Joseph Rowntree Foundation
- Bell, S, "Delivering sustainability therapy in sustainable development projects", Journal of Environmental Management, 75(1), pp.37~51 (2005)
- Bell, S, "Sustainable development indicators: The tyranny of methodology revisited", Consilience: The Journal of Sustainable Development, 6(1), pp.222~239 (2011)
- Benn S, "Towards new forms of governance for issues of sustainability:Renewing relationships between corporates, government, and community", Journal of Radical Organisation Theory, 9(1), pp.1~9 (2005)
- Bertelsmann Stiftung, "Policy performance and governance capacities in the OECD and EU: Sustainable governance indicators 2017" (2017), Bertelsmann Stiftung
- Bertelsmann Stiftung, "SGI 2017 Scores" (2017), Bertelsmann Stiftung
- Bleischwitz, R, "Governance of sustainable development: Co-evolution of corporate and political strategies", International Journal of Sustainable Development, 7(1), pp.27~43 (2004)
- Boström, M, "A reflexive look at reflexivity in environmental sociology", Environmental Sociology, 3(1), pp.6~16 (2017)
- 최영준, "사회과학에서 퍼지셋 활용의 모색: 퍼지 이상형 분석과 결합 요인 분석을 중심으로", 정부학연구, 15(3), pp.307~336 (2009), 정부학연구소
- Dean, M, "Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society" (1999), Sage
- Dodson, M, "Mining, minerals and sustainable development", Paper presented at the Putting Principles into Practice: Sustainable Development Conference (2002)
- Governance for sustainable development: Strategic issues and principles for Indigenous Australian communities, "Dodson, M", Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, ~, pp.Discussion Paper 250 (2003)
- Doherty, B, "Democracy and green political thought" (1996), Routledge
- Dryzek, J, "Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, contestations" (2000), Oxford University Press
- Farrell, K. N, "From *for*to governance for sustainable development in Europe: What is at stake for further research", International Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(1, pp.2) (2005), 127~150
- Glasbergen, P, "Understanding partnerships for sustainable development analytically:The ladder of partnership activity as a methodological tool", Environmental Policy and Governance, 21(1), pp.1~13 (2010)
- Goodin, R. E, "Green political theory" (1992), Polity
- Gough, I, "Globalization and regional welfare regimes: The East Asian case", Global Social Policy, 1(2), pp.163~189 (2001)
- Hass, P. M, "Emerging forces in environmental governance" (2004), United Nations University Press
- Hezri, A, "Sustainability indicators, policy and governance: Issues for ecological economics", Ecological Economics, 60(1), pp.86~99 (2006)
- 허태욱, "Towards Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development", Journal of Policy Studies, 25(3), pp.1~22 (2010), 서울대학교행정대학원
- Hyden, G, "Operationalizing governance for sustainable development", Journal of Development Studies, 17(2), pp.13~31 (2001)
- Jessop, B, "The new politics of local governance in Britain", pp.11~32 (2000), Oxford University Press
- Jordan, A, "The governance of sustainable development: Taking stock and looking forwards", Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26(1), pp.17~33 (2008)
- Jung, G. H, "What is green governance", Environment and Life, 31, pp.23~37 (2002)
- 7, "Global Civil Society 2006", pp.2006, Katz, H
- Kvist, J, "Welfare reform in the Nordic countries in the 1990s : Using fuzzy-set theory to assess conformity to ideal types", Journal of European Social Policy, 9(3), pp.231~252 (1999)
- Klijn, E. H, "Complexity in governance network theory", Complexity, Governance, and Networks, 1(1), pp.61~70 (2014)
- Kooiman, J, "Debating governance: Authority, steering, and democracy" (2000), Oxford University Press
- Kooiman, J, "Governing as governance" (2003), Sage
- Kvist, J, "Fuzzy set ideal type analysis", Journal of Business Research, 60(5), pp.474~481 (2007)
- Lafferty, W. M, "Governance for sustainable development: The challenge of adapting form to function" (2004), Edward Elgar
- Lafferty, W. M, "Implementing Sustainable Development" (2000), Oxford University
- 이도형, "발전행정론의재구성을위한시론:현대 발전이론의 이론적 시사점과 발전전략적 함의를 중심으로", 한국행정학보, 36(4), pp.43~63 (2002), 한국행정학회
- Li, G, "Multi-attribute decision making with generalized fuzzy numbers", Journal of the Operational Research Society, 66(11), pp.1793~1803 (2015)
- March, J. G, "Democratic governance" (1995), Free Press
- Pierre, J, "Reinventing governance", reinventing democracy? Policy and Politics, 37(4), pp.591~609 (2009)
- Ragin, C. C, "Fuzzy-set social science" (2000), University of Chicago Press
- Ragin, C. C, "Democratization and political culture in comparative perspective: Festschrift für Dirk Berg-Schlosser" (2005), Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften
- Ragin, C. C, "Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond" (2008), University of Chicago Press
- Rawls, J, "Political liberalism" (1993), Columbia University Press
- Rhodes, R. A. W, "Understanding governance: Ten years on", Organization Studies, 28(8), pp.1243~1264 (2007)
- Rihoux, B, "Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related systematic comparative methods: Recent advances and remaining challenges for social science research", International Sociology, 21(5), pp.679~706 (2006)
- Robinson, J, "Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development", Ecological Economics, 48(4), pp.369~384 (2004)
- SDG Index and dashboards report 2017: Global responsibilities, "Sachs, J", Bertelsmann Stiftung and Sustainable Development Solutions Network, ~ (2017)
- Scharpf, F, "Disaffected democracies: What’s troubling the trilateral countries" (2000), Princeton University Press
- Schneider, C. Q, "Case studies nested in fuzzy-set QCA on sufficiency:Formalizing case selection and causal inference", Sociological Methods and Research, 45(3), pp.526~568 (2016)
- 석재은, "OECD 복지국가 지속가능성의 다차원적 평가와 지속가능 유형별 복지정책의 특성", 보건사회연구, 34(4), pp.5~35 (2014), 한국보건사회연구원[DOI]
- Sharma, S. D, "Democracy, good governance, and economic development", Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 3(1), pp.29~62 (2007)
- Sørensen, E, "Network governance and post-liberal democracy", Administrative Theory and Praxis, 27(2), pp.197~237 (2005)
- Stojanović, I, "Good governance as a tool of sustainable development", European Journal of Sustainable Development, 5(4), pp.558~557 (2016)
- Treib O, "Modes of governance : A note towards conceptual clarification", Journal of European Public Policy, 14(1), pp.1~20 (2005)
- Tosun, J, "Governing the interlinkages between the sustainable development goals : Approaches to attain policy integration", Global Challenges, 1(9), pp.1700036~ (2017)
- UNDESA, "Governance and development: Thematic think piece" (2012), UN System Task Team on the post-2015 UN Development Agenda
- Voß, J. -P, "The politics of reflexive governance : Challenges for designing adaptive management and transition management", Ecology and Society, 16(2), pp.9~ (2011)
- Voß, J. -P, "Reflexive governance for sustainable development" (2006), Edward Elgar
- Waas, T, "Sustainability assessment and indicators: Tools in a decision-making strategy for sustainable development", Sustainability, 6(9), pp.5512~5534 (2014)
- Weale, A, "Governing sustainability" (2009), Cambridge University Press
- 양재진, "복지국가의 저발전에 관한 실증 연구: 제도주의적 신권력자원론의 타당성 검토", 한국정치학회보, 46(5), pp.79~97 (2012), 한국정치학회[DOI]
- Zeijl‐Rozema, A, "Governance for sustainable development: A framework", Sustainable Development, 16(6), pp.410~421 (2008)
