한국 근대 불교사상의 세가지 유형 -근대적 종교상황에 대응하는 새로운 종교활동이라는 관점에서-
A Three Type of Korean Modern Buddhist Thought
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper, I will divide Korean modern buddhist thought to a three type. The first type is the buddhist thought to pursuit a social participation. Han Yong Woon's thought belongs to the first type. Han Yong Woon emphasizes the social participation. But he does not deny the religious constituent. The second type is the buddhist thought to reform the buddhist world, but not to pursuit the social participation. Park Han Young and Baek Yong Seong's thought belong to the second type. Park Han Young pursuits to reform the buddhist world, but he is passive in social participation. Baek Yong Seong pursuits to reform the buddhist world through the movement of Daegakgyo. But he is also not active in social participation. The third type is buddhist thought to succeed to the tradition, not to pursuit the change of the buddhist world. Bang Han Am belongs to this type. He succeeds to the tradition, but he is not dependent to the authority. In three type, the third type is the main stream in Korean buddhist world. The first type disappeared through the conflict of the left wing and the right wing after the 1945 Liberration. The second type was weakening through the dispute of the buddhist monk after 1950's.
Abstract
In this paper, I will divide Korean modern buddhist thought to a three type. The first type is the buddhist thought to pursuit a social participation. Han Yong Woon's thought belongs to the first type. Han Yong Woon emphasizes the social participation. But he does not deny the religious constituent. The second type is the buddhist thought to reform the buddhist world, but not to pursuit the social participation. Park Han Young and Baek Yong Seong's thought belong to the second type. Park Han Young pursuits to reform the buddhist world, but he is passive in social participation. Baek Yong Seong pursuits to reform the buddhist world through the movement of Daegakgyo. But he is also not active in social participation. The third type is buddhist thought to succeed to the tradition, not to pursuit the change of the buddhist world. Bang Han Am belongs to this type. He succeeds to the tradition, but he is not dependent to the authority. In three type, the third type is the main stream in Korean buddhist world. The first type disappeared through the conflict of the left wing and the right wing after the 1945 Liberration. The second type was weakening through the dispute of the buddhist monk after 1950's.
참고문헌 (28)
- "한용운전집 1권" (1973), 신구문화사
- "한용운전집 2권" (1973), 신구문화사
- "각해일륜" (1978), 보련각
- "한암일발록" (1996), 한암문도회
- 한종만, "한국근대민중불교의 이념과 전개" (1983), 한길사
- 안병직, "한용운" (1980), 한길사
- 김광식, "용성" (1999), 민족사
- 유병덕, "일제시대의 불교", 박길진 화갑기념 한국종교사상사 (1975)
- 한종만, "박한영과 한용운의 한국불교근대화사상", 원광대학논문집, 5 (1970)
- 한종만, "불교유신사상 in: 한국근대민중불교의 이념과 전개" (1983), 한길사
- 심재룡, "근대한국불교의 네 가지 반응 유형에 대하여", 철학사상, 16(16) (2003), 서울대 철학사상연구소
- 노권용, "박한영의 불교사상과 유신운동 in: 숭산 박길진 박사 고희기념 한국근대종교사상사" (1984), 원광대출판국
- 정순일, "한용운의 불교사상 in: 숭산 박길진박사 고희기념 한국근대종교사상사" (1984), 원광대출판국
- 강미자, "한용운의 신간회와 반종교운동인식에 대한 일고찰", 한국불교학, 48 (2007)
- 김광식, "1930년대 불교계의 반종교운동 인식 in: 근현대불교의 재조명" (2000), 민족사
- 김광식, "조선불교조계종의 성립과 역사적 의의 in: 새불교운동의 전개" (2002), 도피안사
- 김광식, "백용성의 불교개혁과 대각교 운동 in: 새불교운동의 전개" (2002), 도피안사
- 김광식, "방한암과 조계종단 in: 민족불교의 이상과 현실" (2007), 도피안사
- 김광식, "불교 근대화의 노선과 용성의 대각교", 대각사상, (10), pp.417~463 (2007), 대각사상연구원
- 김호성, "한암의 도의-보조법통설", 보조사상, 2 (1988), 보조사상연구원
- 김호성, "한암선사 in: 한국불교인물사상사" (1995), 민족사
- 을 중심으로, "불교학연구", 2007, 183~207, pp.불교학연구회
- 김창숙(효탄), "석전 박한영의 『계학약전』과 역사적 성격", 한국사연구, 107 (1999), 한국사연구회
- 김남수, "일제시대 불교계 초기사회주의운동", 선우도량, (13) (1998), 선우도량
- 박재현, "만해 한용운의 선적 역할의식에 관한 연구", 불교학연구, 16, pp.109~135 (2007), 불교학연구회
- 이상철, "한용운의 사회사상(上)", 한국학보, 30 (1983)
- 전보삼, "석전화상 in: 한국불교인물사상사" (1995), 민족사
- 조명제, "근대불교의 지향과 굴절 梵魚寺의 경우를 중심으로", 불교학연구, (13), pp.35~66 (2006), 불교학연구회