The Discourse of Reform and the Perception of Tradition in Modern Korean Buddhism
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The present article examines the major pursuits of the discourse of reform in modern Korean Buddhism and considers the characteristics and significance of their contribution to the establishment of the tradition and identity of Korean Buddhism. Based on Gwon Sang-ro’s “Treatise on the Reformation of Korean Buddhism” which was featured as a series in the Buddhist magazine Korean Buddhism Monthly from 1912 to 1913, Han Yong-un’s Treatise on the Restoration of Korean Buddhism, which was published by the Buddhist Bookstore in 1913, and Yi Yeongjae’s “Treatise on the Renovation of Korean Buddhism” which was published as a series in the Chosun Ilbo in 1922, the article summarizes the objectives of the argument for reform, which include the following: breaking free from tradition, religious and philosophical features, the emphasis on education and propagation for the popularization of Buddhism, and the establishment of an organized body of the Buddhist order. In the 1910s, Han Yong-un and Gwon Sang-ro were conscious of the competition with other religions as it pleaded for the reform of Buddhism. From the standpoint of social Darwinism and the theory of civilization, they regarded self-strengthening as the only way to survive in the religious competition and proclaimed to escape tradition and eliminate all superstitions elements. Influenced by the March First Movement, however, from the 1920s, the task to review the status of Buddhism from the point of view of the nation, culture, and thought was undertaken. The reverence and worship of the Tripitaka Koreana at Haeinsa and Wonhyo are typical examples. If breaking away from tradition was considered a means to be reborn as a civilized religion in the 1910s, the path that was chosen in the 1920s was to excavate and inherit cultural tradition and become the agent of the nation and culture. Meanwhile, the key point of Yi Yeongjae’s argument for reform was to criticize colonial Buddhism policies and argue for an independent administrative system of the Buddhist order. The establishment of a controlling agency or an organized body of the Buddhist order had been discussed in earnest starting from the mid- to late 1930s, and finally, in 1941, the Jogye Order of the Buddhism of Joseon was born. The choice to name the order Jogye Order was the outcome of efforts to declare the tradition and identity of Korean Buddhism. The discourse of reform of modern Korean Buddhism carries significance in the history of Buddhism in that it did not merely pursue modernization but attempted to excavate and recreate tradition, which led to the efforts to establish an identity as a modern religion.
Abstract
The present article examines the major pursuits of the discourse of reform in modern Korean Buddhism and considers the characteristics and significance of their contribution to the establishment of the tradition and identity of Korean Buddhism. Based on Gwon Sang-ro’s “Treatise on the Reformation of Korean Buddhism” which was featured as a series in the Buddhist magazine Korean Buddhism Monthly from 1912 to 1913, Han Yong-un’s Treatise on the Restoration of Korean Buddhism, which was published by the Buddhist Bookstore in 1913, and Yi Yeongjae’s “Treatise on the Renovation of Korean Buddhism” which was published as a series in the Chosun Ilbo in 1922, the article summarizes the objectives of the argument for reform, which include the following: breaking free from tradition, religious and philosophical features, the emphasis on education and propagation for the popularization of Buddhism, and the establishment of an organized body of the Buddhist order. In the 1910s, Han Yong-un and Gwon Sang-ro were conscious of the competition with other religions as it pleaded for the reform of Buddhism. From the standpoint of social Darwinism and the theory of civilization, they regarded self-strengthening as the only way to survive in the religious competition and proclaimed to escape tradition and eliminate all superstitions elements. Influenced by the March First Movement, however, from the 1920s, the task to review the status of Buddhism from the point of view of the nation, culture, and thought was undertaken. The reverence and worship of the Tripitaka Koreana at Haeinsa and Wonhyo are typical examples. If breaking away from tradition was considered a means to be reborn as a civilized religion in the 1910s, the path that was chosen in the 1920s was to excavate and inherit cultural tradition and become the agent of the nation and culture. Meanwhile, the key point of Yi Yeongjae’s argument for reform was to criticize colonial Buddhism policies and argue for an independent administrative system of the Buddhist order. The establishment of a controlling agency or an organized body of the Buddhist order had been discussed in earnest starting from the mid- to late 1930s, and finally, in 1941, the Jogye Order of the Buddhism of Joseon was born. The choice to name the order Jogye Order was the outcome of efforts to declare the tradition and identity of Korean Buddhism. The discourse of reform of modern Korean Buddhism carries significance in the history of Buddhism in that it did not merely pursue modernization but attempted to excavate and recreate tradition, which led to the efforts to establish an identity as a modern religion.
참고문헌 (22)
- Choe, Byeonghyeon, "Introduction to the Research of the History of Korean Buddhism", pp.19~84 (2013), Jisik saneopsa
- Choe, Byeonghyeon, "Introduction to the Research of the History of Korean Buddhism", pp.271~316 (2013), Jisik saneopsa
- Han, Yong-un, "Treatise on the Restoration of Korean Buddhism" (2007), Unjusa
- 조명제, "한용운의 『조선불교유신론』과 일본의 근대지(近代知)", 한국사상사학, (46), pp.313~338 (2014), 한국사상사학회
- Kim, Chunnam, "Manhae’s Acceptance of Western Thought Seen through Liang Qichao: Focusing on Treatise on the Restoration of Korean Buddhism", MA, pp.1984
- Kim, Gwangsik, "The Life iof Yi Yeongjae and “Treatise on the Renovation of Korean Buddhism”", Journal of Korean Independence Movement Studies, 9, pp.95~123 (1995)
- Kim, Gwangsik, "A Study of the Modern History of Korean Buddhism", pp.366~401 (1996), Minjoksa
- Kim, Gwangsik, "The Development of a Movement for New Buddhism", pp.232~261 (2002), Dopiansa
- 김종인, "한국 문화로서의 불교 ― 20세기 초 한국에서의 불교의 정체성 ―", 종교연구, (60), pp.61~87 (2010), 한국종교학회[DOI]
- 김상영, "전 근대 조계종 역사의 전개양상과 그 특성", 禪學(선학), (36), pp.454~492 (2013), 한국선학회
- 김성연, "1910년대 불교 근대화론과 종교적 지평의 확대", 불교학연구, 48, pp.1~30 (2016), 불교학연구회[DOI]
- Kim, Seong Yeon, "A Study on the Formation of Buddhist Orders under Japanese Colonialism: Focusing on Organizational Structure and Financial Management of a Central Organization", PhD, pp.2018
- 김성연, "조선불교청년총동맹의 성립과 활동", 사학연구, (132), pp.431~470 (2018), 한국사학회[DOI]
- 김용태, "조계종 종통의 역사적 이해 - 근·현대 종명, 종조, 종지 논의를 중심으로 -", 禪學(선학), (35), pp.144~168 (2013), 한국선학회
- Lopez Jr., Donald S., "Critical Terms for the Study of Buddhism" (2005), University of Chicago Press
- McMahan, David L, "The Making of Buddhist Modernism", pp.61~88 (2008), Oxford University Press
- Park, Chanseung, "Nation and Nationalism" (2010), Sohwa
- Ryu, Sihyeon, "Reading Modernity Again", pp.375~404 (2006), Yeoksa bipyeongsa
- Sim, Jaeryong, "Is Korean Buddhism Transdenominational?", The Buddhist Review, 3, pp.176~190 (2003)
- 송현주, "근대 한국불교의 종교정체성 인식 - 1910-1930년대 불교잡지를 중심으로-", 불교학연구, 7, pp.11~360 (2003), 불교학연구회
- 송현주, "근대 한국불교 통불교론의 두 유형 ―‘초종파주의 통불교론’과 ‘선종파주의 통불교론’—", 종교문화연구, (24), pp.149~184 (2015), 종교와문화연구소
- Yang, Eunyong, "Korean Intellectual History", pp.139~175 (1993), Hanguk jeongsin munhwa yeonguwon
