본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중등 교실 역사학습평가의 개선방안 -내용타당도 측면에서-

Alternatives on Classroom History Assessments in Secondary Schools in Aspects of Content Validity

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The purpose of this study is to propose ways of validating classroom history assessment tools. For this study, first, it investigated problems in classroom history assessments through the review of studies related to history assessments. Second, it produced methods to align between the content of assessments and objectives of curriculum in history by using a content matrix. Third, it showed examples of test items suited to each historical thinking skill. The results of this study indicated that history teachers do not have sufficient experience of systematic educational training courses related to classroom assessments. Most of history teachers proceed classroom assessments without any clear plans. However, teachers including history teachers do not aware of themselves who are not equipped sufficiently with assessment expertise. Experts in educational evaluation understand that teachers lack in sufficient knowledge and skills in classroom assessments and are not ready to proceed it. These experts see keenly the necessity of reform in teacher training programs and curriculum of teacher college in order to solve the problems in classroom assessments. As for solving these problems found, this study proposes ways of aligning among history content, historical thinking skills, and objectives in history curriculum. First, in order to align the content of assessments with objectives of curriculum, the content of assessments should include historical knowledge representing the content of curriculum in history. Second, the distribution of the content in test items should also be balanced across the objectives and thoroughly cover the span of knowledge in the curriculum. Third, each test item should be appropriate for each historical thinking level to assess dept historical understanding. The results of this study will be used for developing the content validity of classroom history assessments in educational programs for history teachers.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to propose ways of validating classroom history assessment tools. For this study, first, it investigated problems in classroom history assessments through the review of studies related to history assessments. Second, it produced methods to align between the content of assessments and objectives of curriculum in history by using a content matrix. Third, it showed examples of test items suited to each historical thinking skill. The results of this study indicated that history teachers do not have sufficient experience of systematic educational training courses related to classroom assessments. Most of history teachers proceed classroom assessments without any clear plans. However, teachers including history teachers do not aware of themselves who are not equipped sufficiently with assessment expertise. Experts in educational evaluation understand that teachers lack in sufficient knowledge and skills in classroom assessments and are not ready to proceed it. These experts see keenly the necessity of reform in teacher training programs and curriculum of teacher college in order to solve the problems in classroom assessments. As for solving these problems found, this study proposes ways of aligning among history content, historical thinking skills, and objectives in history curriculum. First, in order to align the content of assessments with objectives of curriculum, the content of assessments should include historical knowledge representing the content of curriculum in history. Second, the distribution of the content in test items should also be balanced across the objectives and thoroughly cover the span of knowledge in the curriculum. Third, each test item should be appropriate for each historical thinking level to assess dept historical understanding. The results of this study will be used for developing the content validity of classroom history assessments in educational programs for history teachers.

참고문헌 (58)

  1. 김경희, "교사의 학생평가 전문성 기준 개발", 교육평가연구, 19(2), pp.89~112 (2006), 한국교육평가학회
  2. 김신영, "현장교사의 평가전문성 연구", 교육평가연구, 15(1), pp.67~85 (2002), 한국교육평가학회
  3. 송미영, "교사의 학생평가 전문성 진단도구 개발", 교육과정평가연구, 10(1), pp.47~74 (2007), 한국교육과정평가원
  4. 이정애, "중학교 교사의 학생평가에 대한 인식과 평가 전문성 연구", 석사, pp.2003
  5. 성열관, "교육과정과 평가 간의 관계를 통해 본 일제고사의 한계와 대안", 『일제식학력평가의 기능과 교사 자율성 문제: 일제식학력평가와 관련된 교사파면해임사태를 중심으로』토론회 발표문 (2009)
  6. James McMillan, "Classroom Assessment: Principles and Practice for Effective Instruction" (2004), Allyn and Bacons
  7. Jay McTighe, "Assessing Learning in the Classroom" (1994), National Education Association
  8. Richard J. Stiggins, "Classroom Assessment for Student Success" (1998), National Education Association
  9. 박도순, "교육과정과 교육평가" (2001), 문음사
  10. 김성훈, "학업성취 평가결과 정보의 유형과 교육적 의의", 교육평가연구, 14(2) (2001)
  11. 황정규, "교육평가의 네가지 원리, In 한국 교육평가의 쟁점과 대안" (2000), 교육과학사
  12. 김미선, "역사(국사)학습평가 내용타당도에 관한 연구 - 교육과정과의 일치성 측면에서 -", 사회과교육, 47(3), pp.135~164 (2008), 한국사회과교육연구학회
  13. 신영창, "중등학교 역사교육에서 평가의 실제와 문제점", 역사와 역사교육, 12 (2006)
  14. 박도순, "수행평가 정책의 방향, In 한국 교육평가의 쟁점과 대안" (2000), 교육과학사
  15. MiSun. Kim, "Alignment of Classroom History Assessments and the 7th National Curriculum in Korea: Assessing Historical Knowledge and Reasoning Skills", 박사, pp.2005
  16. Anthony Nitko, "Educational Assessment of Student(3rd)" (1996), Prentice Hall, Inc
  17. 교사의 학생 평가 전문성 신장 모형과 기준, "이인제", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.연구보고 RRE 2004-5-2 (2004)
  18. 양정현, "역사교육에서 평가 논의의 난맥상과 개선방안", 역사교육, 80 (2001)
  19. 최상훈, "역사적 사고력 육성을 위한 평가문항 개발방안", 역사와 역사교육, 5 (2000)
  20. American Psychological Association, "Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing", American Psychological Association, American Educational Research Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education, ~ (1985)
  21. 성태제, "타당도와 신뢰도" (2007), 학지사
  22. 성태제, "문항제작 및 분석의 이론과 실제" (2004), 학지사
  23. Samuel Messick, "Meaning and Values in Test Validation : The Science and Ethics of Assessment", Educational Researcher, 18(2) (1989)
  24. 김성숙, "타당도와 신뢰도에 대한 새로운 의미, In 한국 교육평가의 쟁점과 대안" (2000), 교육과학사
  25. M. Tombari, "Authentic Assessment in the Classroom: Application and Practice" (1999), Prentice-Hall
  26. Robert L. Linn, "Can Performance-Based Assessment be Psychometrically Sound?, In Performance-Based Student Assess: Challenge and Possibilities" (1996), The University of Chicago Press
  27. Benchmarking and Alignment of Standards and Testing, "Robert Rothman", CSE, ~, pp.CSE Technical Report 566 (2002)
  28. Luli Stern, "Analysis of Students’Assessments in Middle School Curriculum Materials: Aiming Precisely at Benchmarks and Standards", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(9) (2002)
  29. Criteria for Alignment of Expectations and Assessments in Mathematics and Science Education, "Norman. L. Webb", Council of Chief State School Officers, ~ (1997)
  30. Alignment Analysis of Four Language Arts Standards and Assessments Grades 5, 8, and 11, "Norman. L. Webb", Wisconsin Center for Education Research, ~ (2001)
  31. J. S. Bruner, "브루너 교육의 과정" (1982), 배영사
  32. 이홍우, "지식의 구조와 교과" (2002), 교육과학사
  33. Denis Shemilt, "History 13-15 Evaluation Study" (1980), Holmes Mcdougall
  34. David Thelen, "Of Audiences, Borderlands, and Comparisons : Toward the Internationalization of American History", Journal of American History, 79(2) (1992)
  35. G. Partington, "The Idea of an Historical Education" (1980), NFER
  36. Linda S. Levstik, "New Directions for Studying Historical Understanding", Theory and Research in Social Education, 20(4) (1992)
  37. Peter Seixas, "Parallel Crises : History and the Social Studies Curriculum in the USA", Journal of Curriculum Studies, 25(3) (1993)
  38. Peter Seixas, "Conceptualizing the Growth of Historical Understanding, In Handbook of Education and Human Development" (1996), Blackwell
  39. T. Lomas, "Teaching and Assessing Historical Understanding" (1990), The Historical Association
  40. 교육인적자원부, "중학교 교육과정 해설(II): 국어, 도덕, 사회 교육부고시 제 1997-15호", 대한교과서주식회사, 317~319 (1999)
  41. 교육인적자원부, "고등학교 교육과정 해설: 사회 교육부고시 제 1997-15호", 대한교과서주식회사, 176~177 (2001)
  42. L. W. Anderson, "A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives" (2001), Longman
  43. Benjamin S. Bloom, "Taxonomy of Educational Objectives : The Classification of Educational Goals" (1987), Longman
  44. Edys S. Quellmalz, "Classroom Assessment of Reasoning Strategies, In Handbook of Classroom Assessment: Learning, Adjustment, and Achievement" (1997), Academic Press
  45. Edys S. Quellmalz, "Needed : Better Methods for Testing Higher-Order Thinking Skills", Educational Leadership, 43(2) (1985)
  46. NCHS, "National Standards for World History : Exploring Paths to the Present", National Center for History in the Schools, University of CA, ~ (1994)
  47. Oxford, "Concise Oxford Dictionary" (1993), Oxford University Press
  48. "National Center for History in the Schools"[URL]
  49. "National Center for History in the Schools"[URL]
  50. 강승호, "현대 교육평가의 이론과 실제", pp.297~
  51. "National Center for History in the Schools"[URL]
  52. "2009년도 대학수학능력시험, 세계사 19번 문항", ~
  53. "2008년도 대학수학능력시험, 국사 1번 문항", ~
  54. "2009년도 대학수학능력시험, 한국 근현대사 20번 문항", ~
  55. "National Center for History in the Schools"[URL]
  56. 최상훈, "역사적 사고력의 하위범주와 역사학습목표의 설정방안", 역사교육, 73 (2000)
  57. "대학제도 큰 틀은 변함없다" (2008), 한겨레[URL]
  58. "주요 사립대 입학전형 슬쩍 바꿔" (2009), 경향신문[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)