본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

서비스 구역 수준별 공유 전동킥보드 통행발생모형 개발

Development of Trip Generation Models for Shared E-Scooter by Service Areas Clustered by Level of Trip Density

이창훈|송태진|김규혁
한국ITS학회 (The Korean Society of Intelligent Transport Systems)|2023.12|한국ITS학회 논문지 (Journal of Korean Society of Intelligent Transport Systems)|제22권 제6호|pp. 124-140|DOI https://doi.org/10.12815/kits.2023.22.6.124

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

전동킥보드마이크로모빌리티Micromobility통행발생모형준포아송 회귀분석E-ScooterTrip generation modelQuasi-poisson regression analysis

초록

세계적으로 공유 전동킥보드의 이용이 급증하면서 해당 수단과 관련된 다양한 연구들이 진행되고 있다. 아직은 초기 단계의 연구 결과가 나타나고 있으며, 그 중 통행에 영향을 미치는 주요요인을 파악하는 연구들이 결과로 나타나고 있다. 특히 통행발생 모형 개발은 교통계획 측면의활용에서 아주 중요하며 신교통수단인 공유 전동킥보드는 국내외적으로 통행발생모형 개발이부재한 실정이다. 본 연구는 선행연구를 면밀히 검토하여 유의미한 변수들을 활용한 공유 전동킥보드 통행발생 모형을 개발하고자 한다. 공유 전동킥보드 특성 상 주요 서비스 지역과 그 외 지역의통행 특성이 상이하다. 서비스 통행량에 근거하여 서비스 수준별 지역을 구분하여 지역별 통행발생모형을 구축했다. 분석 결과, 주요 서비스 지역 내 공유 전동킥보드 통행에 영향을 미치는 요인은대학 유무, 근접중심성, 문화지역 면적 등으로 나타난 반면, 그 외 지역 내 공유 전동킥보드통행에 영향을 미치는 요인은 대학 유무, 매개중심성, 통행거리 등으로 나타났다.

Abstract

The rapid growth in shared E-scooters worldwide has led to many studies on the topic. The results of these studies are still in the early stages, and the main factors affecting trips are being identified. In particular, the development of trip-generation models is very important for transportation planning, and a new transportation mode for developing the models for shared E-scooters is lacking both domestically and internationally. This study aims to develop a trip generation model for shared E-scooters using significant variables by thoroughly reviewing previous studies. The trip characteristics of major service areas and other areas may differ owing to the trip characteristics of the mode. The trip generation models were developed based on the service trip density by dividing the areas by service level. The factors affecting shared E-scooter trips in major service areas included the presence of universities, closeness centrality, and cultural areas, while factors affecting the trips in minor service areas included the presence of universities, betweenness centrality, and trip distance. The developed models provide basic information that can be used to establish transport policies for introducing shared E-scooters in cities in the future.

참고문헌 (44)

  1. Ankerst, M., "OPTICS : Ordering points to identify the clustering structure", ACM Sigmod Record, 28(2), pp.49~60 (1999)
  2. Bai, S., "Dockless E-scooter usage patterns and urban built Environments : A comparison study of Austin, TX, and Minneapolis MN", Travel Behaviour and Society, 20, pp.264~272 (2020)
  3. Bieliński, T., "Electric scooter sharing and bike sharing user behaviour and characteristics", Sustainability, 12(22), pp.9640~ (2020)
  4. Caspi, O., "Spatial associations of dockless shared e-scooter usage", Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 86, pp.102396~ (2020)
  5. Chen, M., "A comparison of users’characteristics between station-based bikesharing system and free-floating bikesharing system : Case study in Hangzhou, China", Transportation, 47(2), pp.689~704 (2020)
  6. Degele, J., "Identifying e-scooter sharing customer segments using clustering", 2018 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE, 2018, 1~8
  7. Etu, J. E., "Forecasting trip generation for high density residential zones of Akure, Nigeria : Comparability of artificial neural network and regression models", Journal of Civil Engineering, Science and Technology, 9(2), pp.76~86 (2018)
  8. Feng, C., "Estimating e-scooter traffic flow using big data to support planning for micromobility", Journal of Urban Technology, 29(2), pp.139~157 (2022)
  9. Fishman, E., "Bikeshare : A review of recent literature", Transport Reviews, 36(1), pp.92~113 (2016)
  10. Fishman, E., "Factors influencing bike share membership : An analysis of Melbourne and Brisbane", Transportation Research Part A : Policy and Practice, 71, pp.17~30 (2015)
  11. Gabriella, A., "Comparison of Poisson and Quasi-Poisson Regression : A Simulation study", ICSA-International Conference on Statistics and Analytics 2019, pp.1~8 (2019)
  12. Glavić, D., "The E-Scooter Potential to Change Urban Mobility-Belgrade Case Study", Sustainability, 13(11), pp.5948~ (2021)
  13. Hampshire, R. C., "An analysis of bike sharing usage : Explaining trip generation and attraction from observed demand", 91St Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, pp.12~2099 (2012)
  14. The Future of Mobility, "Heineke, K.", McKinsey Quarterly, 1~14 (2023)
  15. Heumann, M., "A spatiotemporal study and location-specific trip pattern categorization of shared e-scooter usage", Sustainability, 13(22), pp.12527~ (2021)
  16. Hong, D., "Investigation of shared micromobility preference for last-mile travel on shared parking lots in city center", Travel Behaviour and Society, 30, pp.163~177 (2023)
  17. 홍석도, "위례 신도시 공유 전동 킥보드 GPS데이터 분석을 통한 이용실태 분석 및 개선사항", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 21(9), pp.471~476 (2021), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
  18. Hosseinzadeh, A., "E-scooters and sustainability : Investigating the relationship between the density of E-scooter trips and characteristics of sustainable urban development", Sustainable Cities and Society, 66, pp.102624~ (2021)
  19. Hosseinzadeh, A., "Spatial analysis of shared e-scooter trips", Journal of Transport Geography, 92, pp.103016~ (2021)
  20. Huo, J., "Influence of the built environment on E-scooter sharing ridership : A tale of five cities", Journal of Transport Geography, 93, pp.103084~ (2021)
  21. ITF, "Safe Micromobility, OECD", ITF, 2020
  22. Jiao, J., "Understanding the shared e-scooter travels in Austin, TX", ISPRS(International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing) International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(2), pp.135~ (2020)
  23. 김규혁, "전동킥보드 통행분포모형 추정을 위한 적정 존단위 선정 연구", 한국ITS학회 논문지, 22(3), pp.51~61 (2023), 한국ITS학회[DOI]
  24. 김수재, "공유 전동킥보드 이용 특성 및 영향요인에 관한 연구", 한국ITS학회 논문지, 20(1), pp.40~53 (2021), 한국ITS학회[DOI]
  25. 이승용, "Development of Trip Generation and Trip Distribution Models for Car-sharing Considering Land Use and Transport Characteristics", 국토계획, 56(5), pp.69~82 (2021), 대한국토·도시계획학회[DOI]
  26. Li, X., "Free-floating bike sharing in Jiangsu : Users’ behaviors and influencing factors", Energies, 11(7), pp.1664~ (2018)
  27. MacQueen, J., "Classification and analysis of multivariate observations", Proceedings of the 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability (1967)
  28. McFadden, D., "Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior", University of California at Berkeley (1973)
  29. McKenzie, G., "Spatiotemporal comparative analysis of scooter-share and bike-share usage patterns in Washington, DC", Journal of Transport Geography, 78, pp.19~28 (2019)
  30. Merlin, L. A., "A segment-level model of shared, electric scooter origins and destinations", Transportation Research Part D : Transport and Environment, vol, 92, pp.102709~ (2021)
  31. The 2019National Transportation Demand Survey & the Operation and Maintenance of Transportation DB system, "Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport and The Korea Transport Institute", ~ (2020)
  32. Mukherjee, J., "A comprehensive review of trip generation models based on land use characteristics", Transportation Research Part D : Transport and Environment, vol, 109, pp.103340~ (2022)
  33. Noland, R. B., "Bikeshare trip generation in New York city", Transportation Research Part A : Policy and Practice, 94, pp.164~181 (2016)
  34. Part, P. Y., "The present and Future of Shared Personal Mobility", Joint Session of Korea Transportation Safety Authority & Road Traffic Authority (2023)
  35. Pazzini, M., "New Micromobility Means of Transport: An Analysis of E-Scooter Users’ Behaviour in Trondheim", International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(12), pp.7374~ (2022)
  36. Pearson, K., "VII. Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution.-III. Regression, heredity, and panmixia", Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, containing papers of a mathematical or physical character, 187, pp.253~318 (1896)
  37. Rousseeuw, P. J., "Silhouettes : A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis", Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 20, pp.53~65 (1987)
  38. Public Bikesharing in North America During a Period of Rapid Expansion: Understanding Business Models, Industry Trends & User Impacts, "Shaheen, S. A.", MTI, 12~29 (2014)
  39. Shaheen, S., "Shared micromoblity policy toolkit: Docked and dockless bike and scooter sharing" (2019), UC Berkeley
  40. Takyi, I. K., "Trip generation analysis in a developing country context", Transportation Research Record, 1285, pp.9~21 (1990)
  41. Tokey, A. I., "Analysis of spatiotemporal dynamics of e-scooter usage in Minneapolis : Effects of the built and social environment", Multimodal Transportation, 1(4), pp.100037~ (2022)
  42. Wilfred, G., "Effects of land use on trip generation in urban areas: Comparison between estimated trip generation rates and planning practices in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania", Southern African Transport Conference (2015)
  43. Zhang, J., "Degree centrality, betweenness centrality, and closeness centrality in social network", 2017 2nd International Conference on Modelling, Simulation and Applied Mathematics(MSAM2017), pp.300~303 (2017)
  44. Zhang, W., "What type of infrastructures do e-scooter riders prefer? A route choice mode", Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 94, pp.102761~ (2021)

관련 논문AI추천

전동킥보드 통행분포모형 추정을 위한 적정 존단위 선정 연구김규혁, 김상훈, 송태진한국ITS학회 · 한국ITS학회 논문지2023 · 제22권 제3호공유 전동킥보드 이용 특성 및 영향요인에 관한 연구김상훈, 김수재, 이경재, 추상호한국ITS학회 · 한국ITS학회 논문지2021 · 제20권 제1호공유 전동킥보드 이용 예측력에 대한 모형 및 영향요인에 관한 연구김대원, 이동민한국ITS학회 · 한국ITS학회 논문지2024 · 제23권 제3호공유 전동킥보드를 고려한 수단선택모형 추정 - 접근통행과 생활권통행을 중심으로 -김수재, 김지윤, 이경재, 추상호한국ITS학회 · 한국ITS학회 논문지2021 · 제20권 제1호개인 통행성향을 고려한 공유 전동킥보드 이용의향 분석: 서울시를 중심으로구자헌, 이윤희, 추상호한국ITS학회 · 한국ITS학회 논문지2022 · 제21권 제1호공유 전동킥보드의 공간적 이용특성 분석: 공간자기상관모형을 중심으로곽민정, 김상훈, 김수재, 추상호한국ITS학회 · 한국ITS학회 논문지2021 · 제20권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (21건)

스태킹 앙상블 기법을 활용한 고속도로 교통정보 예측모델 개발 및 교차검증에 따른 성능 비교박성호, 김예진, 윤일수, 오석진, 이요셉pp. 1-16심층 생성모델 기반 합성인구 생성 성능 향상을 위한 개체 임베딩 분석연구유승모, 오태호, 강희찬, 권동현pp. 17-31활동기반 교통수요 모델링을 위한 투어기반 통행분석 및 보정방안오태호, 강희찬, 유예지, 유승모pp. 32-48개인성향 요인이 탄소저감형 교통서비스 잠재선호에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구추상호, 이윤희, 이경재pp. 49-65저상 좌석버스 도입에 대한 지불의사금액 추정 연구최동준, 장정아, 이용주pp. 66-76
원문 보기