혼합 교통류의 적정 평가지표 기반 안전성 분석
A Safety Analysis Based on Evaluation Indicators of Mixed Traffic Flow
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 연구는 자율주행 차량이 혼재된 교통류의 안전성 평가에 적합한 안전성 지표를 선정하여 차량 추종 조합별 안전성을 분석하였다. 고속도로 엇갈림구간은 기본구간에 비해 차로 변경이 빈번하여 상충 빈도가 높은 구간으로, 일반 차량과 자율주행 차량의 주행행태 차이로 인한 위험이 증가할 것으로 예상하여 고속도로 엇갈림구간을 분석구간으로 설정하였다. 미시적교통 시뮬레이션인 VISSIM을 활용하여 분석을 수행하였으며, 혼합 교통류의 환경은 본선-연결로 형태의 엇갈림구간을 300, 600m의 길이로 구분하고, IDM을 활용하여 자율주행 차량의주행행태를 구현하였다. 혼합 교통류 평가에 적합한 안전성 지표는 운전자가 체감하는 위험도와 유사하게 위험 수준을 나타내는 것을 기준으로 4개의 지표를 선정하였다. 선정된 4개 지표의 위험 기준을 넘는 차량 추종 궤적을 대상으로 안전성을 분석한 결과, 자율주행 차량이 자율주행 차량을 추종하는 상황이 가장 안전한 추종 쌍이며, 인간 운전자 차량이 자율주행 차량을추종할 경우가 가장 위험한 추종 쌍인 것으로 나타났다.
Abstract
This study analyzed the characteristics of mixed traffic flows with autonomous vehicles on highway weaving sections and assessed the safety of vehicle-following pairs based on surrogate safety indicators. The intelligent driver model (IDM) was utilized to emulate the driving behavior of autonomous vehicles, and the weaving sections were divided into lengths of 300 and 600 meters for analysis within a micro-traffic simulation (VISSIM). Although significant differences were found in the average speed, density, and headway between the two sections through t-test results, no significant differences were observed when comparing the number of conflicts per indicator and the vehicle-following pair. Four safety indicators were selected for the mixed traffic evaluation based on their ability to represent risk levels similar to those perceived by drivers. The safety analysis, based on the selected four indicators, determined that autonomous vehicles following other autonomous vehicles were the safest pairing. Future research should focus on integrating these indicators into a single comprehensive index for analysis.
참고문헌 (21)
- Ahmed, H. U., "A Review of Car-Following Models and Modeling Tools for Human and Autonomous-Ready Driving Behaviors in Micro-Simulation", Smart Cities, 4(1), pp.314~335 (2021)
- Beauchamp, É., "Study of automated shuttle interactions in city traffic using surrogate measures of safety", Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 135, pp.103465~ (2022)
- Beza, A. D., "How PTV Vissim Has Been Calibrated for the Simulation of Automated Vehicles in Literature?", Advances in Civil Engineering, 2022, pp.1~18 (2022)
- Das, T., "Longitudinal traffic conflict analysis of autonomous and traditional vehicle platoons in field tests via surrogate safety measures", Accident Analysis & Prevention, 177, pp.106822~ (2022)
- He, Z., "Assessing Surrogate Safety Measures using a Safety Pilot Model Deployment Dataset", Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2672(38), pp.1~11 (2018)
- Hu, X., "Autonomous Vehicle’s Impact on Traffic : Empirical Evidence From Waymo Open Dataset and Implications From Modelling", IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 24(6), pp.6711~6724 (2023)
- Jo, Y., "Suitability Evaluation for Simulated Maneuvering of Autonomous Vehicles", The Journal of the Korea Institute of Intelligent Transport Systems, 21(2), pp.183~200 (2022)
- Lu, C., "Performance evaluation of surrogate measures of safety with naturalistic driving data", Accident Analysis & Prevention, 162, pp.106403~ (2021)
- Mahmud, S. M. S., "Application of proximal surrogate indicators for safety evaluation : A review of recent developments and research needs", IATSS Research, 41(4), pp.153~163 (2017)
- Makridis, M., "Estimating reaction time in Adaptive Cruise Control System", 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) (2018)
- Moon, S., "Design, tuning, and evaluation of a full-range adaptive cruise control system with collision avoidance", Control Engineering Practice, 17(4), pp.442~455 (2009)
- Mousavi, S. M., "Investigating the safety and operational benefits of mixed traffic environments with different automated vehicle market penetration rates in the proximity of a driveway on an urban arterial", Accident Analysis & Prevention, 152, pp.105982~ (2021)
- Mullakkal-Babu, F. A., "Comparative Safety Assessment of Automated Driving Strategies at Highway Merges in Mixed Traffic", IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23(4), pp.1~14 (2020)
- Orlovska, J., "Effects of the driving context on the usage of Automated Driver Assistance Systems(ADAS)-Naturalistic Driving Study for ADAS evaluation", Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 4, pp.100093~ (2020)
- Park, H., "Development of a lane change risk index using vehicle trajectory data", Accident Analysis & Prevention, 110, pp.1~8 (2018)
- Pulugurtha, S. S., "Evaluating the Role of Weaving Section Characteristics and Traffic on Crashes in Weaving Areas", Traffic Injury Prevention, 11(1), pp.104~113 (2010)
- Seraj, M., "Multilane Microscopic Modeling to Measure Mobility and Safety Consequences of Mixed Traffic in Freeway Weaving Sections", Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2021, pp.1~21 (2021)
- Tarko, A. P., "Surrogate Measures of Safety", pp.383~405 (2018), Emerald Publishing Limited EBooks
- UNO, N., "Objective Analysis of Traffic Conflict and Modeling of Vehicular Speed Adjustment at Weaving Section", Infrastructure Planning Review, 20, pp.989~996 (2003)
- Wang, C., "A review of surrogate safety measures and their applications in connected and automated vehicles safety modeling", Accident Analysis &Prevention, 157, pp.106157~ (2021)
- Zhang, J., "Safety Evaluation for Connected and Autonomous Vehicles’ Exclusive Lanes considering Penetrate Ratios and Impact of Trucks Using Surrogate Safety Measures", Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2020, pp.1~16 (2020)