본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Instructional Directions through Students’ Self-Assessment on Their Own Writing

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This study examined how the college students who took an English composition class assessedtheir own writing, based on what they have learned in the class, what changes they haveexperienced, and what writing areas need to be improved for the future instruction. 39 studentsparticipated in this study, and data were collected by conducting a survey with both closed andopen-ended questions. As results of the analysis, 66.7% of the students perceived themselves asnot a good English writer, and they provided the reasons. Interestingly, the most comment theyoffered was that their limited vocabulary led them to prevent from expressing themselves. Ingrammar, they were confident in using subject-verb agreement the most; in contrast, theypresented the least confidence in the use of articles. In terms of sentence levels, they showed theleast confidence in connecting sentence to sentence smoothly. In idea development, the studentsstill need more effective ways to develop a topic sentence and create supporting ideas, and theyfurther need to practice how to express their ideas in a logical way. The students also utilizeddiverse strategies when developing their ideas; especially, writing ideas in Korean was amedium to move on to the L2. In addition, multiple drafts helped them change their attitudes inwriting and elaborate writing with a topic sentence, supporting ideas, and a concluding sentence

Abstract

This study examined how the college students who took an English composition class assessedtheir own writing, based on what they have learned in the class, what changes they haveexperienced, and what writing areas need to be improved for the future instruction. 39 studentsparticipated in this study, and data were collected by conducting a survey with both closed andopen-ended questions. As results of the analysis, 66.7% of the students perceived themselves asnot a good English writer, and they provided the reasons. Interestingly, the most comment theyoffered was that their limited vocabulary led them to prevent from expressing themselves. Ingrammar, they were confident in using subject-verb agreement the most; in contrast, theypresented the least confidence in the use of articles. In terms of sentence levels, they showed theleast confidence in connecting sentence to sentence smoothly. In idea development, the studentsstill need more effective ways to develop a topic sentence and create supporting ideas, and theyfurther need to practice how to express their ideas in a logical way. The students also utilizeddiverse strategies when developing their ideas; especially, writing ideas in Korean was amedium to move on to the L2. In addition, multiple drafts helped them change their attitudes inwriting and elaborate writing with a topic sentence, supporting ideas, and a concluding sentence

참고문헌 (32)

  1. Baldwin, M., "Does self-assessment in a group help students to learn?", Social Work Education, 19, pp.451~462 (2000)
  2. Benson, P., "Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning" (2001), Longman
  3. Benson, P., "Learner autonomy 7: Challenges to research and practice" (2002), Authentik
  4. Blue, G. M., "Individualization and Autonomy in language learning", pp.100~118 (1988), Modern English Publications in Association with The British Council
  5. Bruning, R., "Developing motivation to write", Educational Psychologist, 35, pp.25~37 (2000)
  6. Cariaga-Lo, L. D., "Understanding learning and performance in", Proceedings of selected research and development presentations at the Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (1992)
  7. Chamot, A. U., "Learner Strategies in Language Learning", pp.71~84 (1987), Prentice Hall
  8. Cohen, A. D., "Interfaces between second language acquisition and language testing research", pp.90~111 (1998), Cambridge University Press
  9. Improving student writing through a language rich environment, "Corona, C.", M.A. Action Research Project, St. Xavier University and IRI, 1998
  10. Esmaeili, H., "Integrated reading and writing tasks and ESL students’ reading and writing performance in an English language test", Canadian Modern Language Review, 58(4), pp.599~620 (2002)
  11. Ferris, D. R., "Treatment of error in second language student writing" (2002), University of Michigan Press
  12. Ferris, D. R., "Response to student writing: Implications for second language students" (2003), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  13. Ferris, D. R., "Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process, and practice" (2005), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  14. Gardner, D., "Establishing self-access" (1999), Cambridge University Press
  15. Graham, S., "Self-regulation and writing: Where do we go from here?", Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, pp.102~114 (1997)
  16. Gripps, C. V., "Review of Research in Education (Vol. 24)", pp.355~392 (1999), American Educational Research Association
  17. Hammann, L., "Self-regulation in academic writing tasks", International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17(1), pp.15~26 (2005)
  18. Hamp-Lyons, L., "Assessing second language writing in academic contexts" (1991), Ablex
  19. Hyland, K., "Second language writing" (2003), Cambridge University Press
  20. Johannessen, L. R., "Teaching thinking and writing for a new century", English Journal, 90, pp.38~46 (2001)
  21. Klenowski, V., "Student self-evaluation process in student-centered teaching and learning contexts of Australia and England", Assessment in Education, 2, pp.145~163 (1995)
  22. Langer, J. A., "Beating the odds : Teaching middle and high school students to read and write well", American Educational Research Journal, 38, pp.837~880 (2001)
  23. Lightbown, P. M., "Do they know what they’re doing? L2 learners’awareness of L1 influence", Language Awareness, 9(4), pp.198~217 (2000)
  24. Lightbown, P. M., "How language are learned" (2006), Oxford University Press
  25. Oscarson, M., "Self-assessment of language proficiency : Rationale and applications", Language Testing, 6, pp.1~13 (1989)
  26. Pennycook, A., "Autonomy and independence in language learning", pp.35~53 (1997), Longman
  27. Reid, J., "Designing and assessing effective classroom writing assignments for NES and ESL students", Journal of Second Language Writing, 4, pp.17~41 (1995)
  28. Schmenk, B., "Globalizing learner autonomy", TESOL Quarterly, 39, pp.107~118 (2005)
  29. Shepard, L. A., "The role of assessment in a learning culture", Educational Researcher, 29(7), pp.4~14 (2000)
  30. Simard, D., "Language awareness and its multiple possibilities for the L2classroom", Foreign Language Annals, 37, pp.96~110 (2004)
  31. Wei, Y., "Supporting Chinese learners of English to implement self-assessment in L2 writing", Proceedings of the Independent Learning Conference 2003 (2004)
  32. Yang, H. C., "Second language writers' strategy use and performance on an integrated reading-listening-writing task", TESOL Quarterly, 46, pp.80~103 (2012)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)